Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Northwest pilots offer to fly small jets, for smaller paychecks

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

chperplt

Registered User
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Posts
4,123
Northwest pilots offer to fly small jets, for smaller paychecks
Liz Fedor, Star Tribune
July 28, 2004 NWA0728

Pilot leaders at Northwest Airlines say they are willing to negotiate a lower pay scale that would allow the carrier to add 70-seat jets to its fleet.

The pilots union said its proposal would preserve jobs while at the same time help Northwest to capitalize on one of the fastest-growing segments in the airline industry.

Northwest declined to comment on the pilot proposal Tuesday. The Eagan-based airline does not have any 70-seat jets in its fleet. Its smaller jets have fewer than 70 seats and are flown by lower-paid pilots at its regional affiliates, Mesaba Airlines and Pinnacle Airlines. Northwest wants regional pilots to also be able to fly 70-seat jets, which the current Northwest contract prohibits, the union said.

Instead of allowing Northwest to assign the flying to Mesaba or Pinnacle or another regional airline, pilot leaders are offering to negotiate labor costs that are competitive with other 70-seat operators.

"What they want is 70-seaters," Curt Kruse, a pilot and spokesman for the Northwest branch of the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), said Tuesday.

ALPA negotiators argue that it is in the best interests of the airline and the union to establish pay rates, benefits and work rules that allow Northwest to compete for 70-seat business.

"We believe the 70-seater is the right size aircraft to fill the gap between the Northwest narrow-body aircraft and the small jets currently flown by Northwest's feeders," Kruse said.

Under the current contract, all Northwest flying in airplanes containing 55 seats or more must be performed by Northwest pilots, except for three dozen 69-seat Avros flown by Eagan-based Mesaba.

Pinnacle, based in Memphis, is flying 44- and 50-seat Canadair Regional Jets (CRJs), but the number of 50-seaters is restricted based on a ratio with the narrow-bodied planes in Northwest's mainline fleet.

In April, Pinnacle CEO Philip Trenary said he'd like to see his airline fly larger airplanes. But he acknowledged that Northwest management probably wants to conclude its pilot negotiations before making decisions about acquiring more small jets.

Northwest has been reducing its workforce since early 2001 and 787 Northwest pilots remain on furloughs. They would have the first rights to obtain the 70-seat flying, according to the proposal that ALPA gave management July 1.

The union is awaiting a counter-proposal from management.

Northwest gave the pilots union a concessionary proposal in February 2003 that would have reduced pilot costs by more than $400 million a year. Management also asked ALPA to allow Northwest to acquire up to 72 small jets seating between 51 and 70 passengers. Executives wanted to remove all restrictions on small jets with 50 or fewer seats. And they wanted to expand seating on Mesaba's Avros from 69 to 85 seats.

A few months ago, Northwest ALPA offered to reduce pilot compensation by $200 million a year. The company has countered with a $300 million proposal.

Both sides hope to reach an agreement by the fall, because the airline has been losing money on its operations for the past three years. Northwest management is seeking to reduce all labor costs by $950 million a year, but the pilots' union is the only work group that has been willing to discuss cutbacks.

The 70-seater jet is a critical topic in the pilot negotiations, because it is a key aspect of defining the scope of flying for Northwest pilots.

There is a strong element of pragmatism in the pilots' approach because they are balancing Northwest's business interests with pilots' job protection interests, Kruse said.

That element was evident in a memo that pilot negotiators sent their members. "Pilot hourly pay rates at airlines currently operating 70-seat jets are significantly lower than pay rates under the NWA pilot contract," Northwest ALPA said in a mailing to pilots. "The difference in total pilot costs is even more pronounced due to differences in work rules, benefits and retirement."

Northwest ALPA included a comparison chart in its mailing that showed the estimated pilot cost per block hour for flying a 70-seat jet. It was $274.85 for Mesaba Airlines, $304.71 for Comair and $249.59 for American Eagle. There isn't a 70-seat rate in Northwest's current pilot contract, but the block hour cost would be $705.47 if the DC-9 rate were used.

That current contract says Northwest pilots have the right to fly jets of over 55 seats, with the one exception being the Mesaba Avros. "We want to translate that language into jobs," Kruse said, but the jobs won't materialize under the existing pay rates, work rules and benefits.

Northwest ALPA's proposal is reminiscent of talks that have been held at American Airlines, said Robert Mann, an airline industry analyst from New York. But American Eagle, the regional carrier, is flying the 70-seaters.

"Unless you bring along flight attendants, mechanics and ground personnel to similar regional pay rates, then you can't equalize the costs," Mann said. American was unable to achieve that goal, and he added that it will be a major challenge for Northwest management
 
It's funny how they keep mentioning AVRO's in that article.
 
FN FAL said:
It's funny how they keep mentioning AVRO's in that article.
Fear not. If this goes through it won't be long before the 36 Avros at Mesaba disappear and are replaced with the new CRJ7s at NWA.
 
Curious?

Very Curious what the pay rates would be?


NWA is no where near the same boat as UAir.


Even with high mainline costs I bet they will not fly for less than Comair.
 
surplus1 said:
Fear not. If this goes through it won't be long before the 36 Avros at Mesaba disappear and are replaced with the new CRJ7s at NWA.
It kind of fits in with this "perception" I have that the "flow through" NWA ALPA is trying to put together to help the little man down there at Pinnacle and Mesaba out of the kindness of their hearts, is really just some kind of "trojan horse".
 
speedwings said:
So do you think the Pinnacle and Mesaba growth will be in neutral for a long time?
I think it will be the opposite... NWA is adding routes and destinations rapidly. At least from 9E's side more than we can adequately staff. If I was a betting man.. this is NWA's way to force the 70 seat issue amongst the NWA pilot's.

9E is doing a ton of point to point service and now with the adddition of flaps 8 on our birds they are pushing us westward. Most of the seasonal service from last year is no longer seasonal for us. The Avro's are also picking up new citeies and routes that were once dominated by the -9.

Once the 70 seat deal is signed.. I would expect airlink's growth to come to a grinding halt or we would be heading back to do more tertiary airports.
 
Last edited:
Ok, you guys have really been smoking some bad stuff and I am tired of hearing the misinformation that is being pushed off as credible information and probably being repeated as fact elsewhere.

LISTEN CAREFULLY!!!!!

NWA Alpa owns ALL flying above 55 seats except for the Avros. Mesaba nor Pinnacle has never had or presently hold any rights to that flying. PERIOD.

There is NO conspiracy to go after the Avros simply because they have a different mission than the proposed aircraft and that was negotiated back in '98. It's more likely the cost of MX on the Avros will get so high over time they may just retire them.

The NWA pilots are not underbidding anyone because there are NO other bidders. Either NWA pilots fly 70 seaters or no one does.

The last thing is that if they decided to develop another carrier, they can give every last one of the 70 seaters to that carrier and Mesaba and Pinnacle can't say D**k.

ARE WE CLEAR ON THIS????

Those are the facts and I will get off my soap box now.. Thanks..
 
Last edited:
Why would NWA ever agree to this? None of the other major airlines have agreed to this, except AMR and it didn't work there. United has the right to outsource unlimited 70-seaters.



Redtailer said:
Ok, you guys have really been smoking some bad stuff and I am tired of hearing the misinformation that is being pushed off as credible information and probably being repeated as fact elsewhere.

LISTEN CAREFULLY!!!!!

NWA Alpa owns ALL flying above 55 seats except for the Avros. Mesaba nor Pinnacle has never had or presently hold any rights to that flying. PERIOD.

There is NO conspiracy to go after the Avros simply because they have a different mission than the proposed aircraft and that was negotiated back in '98. It's more likely the cost of MX on the Avros will get so high over time they may just retire them.

The NWA pilots are not underbidding anyone because there are NO other bidders. Either NWA pilots fly 70 seaters or no one does.

The last thing is that if they decided to develop another carrier, they can give every last one of the 70 seaters to that carrier and Mesaba and Pinnacle can't say D**k.

ARE WE CLEAR ON THIS????

Those are the facts and I will get off my soap box now.. Thanks..
 
Why would NWA ever agree to this? None of the other major airlines have agreed to this, except AMR and it didn't work there. United has the right to outsource unlimited 70-seaters.
Because NWA wants the 70 seaters. The problem is that they have to come through the NWA pilots to get them. Unfortunately, under the current contract they cannot profitably fly the aircraft, hence the negotiation for the lower rates.

If you read the proposal from NWA Alpa you will see a difference. United negotiated away the right to fly the 70 seaters. AMR tried to recapture the flying after they realized they gave it up. In each case it was a J4J proposal. Not saying that it is bad, but there were a lot of other issues at work. What NWA is doing is fundamentally different in that it is being treated, at the moment, as another fleet type at NWA.
 
"There is NO conspiracy to go after the Avros simply because they have a different mission than the proposed aircraft and that was negotiated back in '98. It's more likely the cost of MX on the Avros will get so high over time they may just retire them."

And the cost of MX and fuel on the 9's isn't high?

Jobear
 
Either NWA pilots fly 70 seaters or no one does.
Wow! That's a great way to stay competitive in todays market. Be careful with that mindset, it may cause the demise of another great airline.
 
Im glad to see Pinnacle is getting flaps 8, the up and down movement from 0 to flaps 20 was quite a ride!
 
NWA has probably one of the best scope languages in the industry.. They have watched other carriers give on scope and seen what happens. NWA pilots do "own" all flying above 55 seat (except for 36 Avro's).

The Avro's and the 44 seaters (the majority of 9E's fleet) are not as nearly profitable as NWA management wants. Avro's are MX and fuel, CRJ-440 is the lack of 6 seats for the same aircraft. This is all about money, lets not forget that.. There is a market where they can make some more bucks and NWA's management wants in on it before a LCC comes along and takes it.

NWA pilot's are trying to find a middle ground without giving away the farm. My only concern would be they agree to rates that are not at or above the current bar on salary.

I for one do not count on ever seeing a 70 seat aircraft under NWA colors on 9E's property. Finally.. whatever NWA MEC decides, the airlinks have little to no say about it.
 
Well, let's light your candle and call you "Holy"

Redtailer said:
Ok, you guys have really been smoking some bad stuff and I am tired of hearing the misinformation that is being pushed off as credible information and probably being repeated as fact elsewhere.
Touchy are we?

LISTEN CAREFULLY!!!!!

NWA Alpa owns ALL flying above 55 seats except for the Avros. Mesaba nor Pinnacle has never had or presently hold any rights to that flying. PERIOD.
Now YOU listen carefully. NWA ALPA doesn't own any flying, you just think you do. The flying belongs to the Company, all of it. At present, all you have is the contractual right to staff airplanes with more than 55-seats for the duration of your current contract, not for life. Your contract, like every other contract, will become amendable. At that time, or sooner if you both wish, you will have the chance to renegotiate those terms. At that time you will get what the Company chooses to give. If you're not happy with that, you can withdraw your services.

No one said that Mesaba or Pinnacle has or holds any rights to that flying. When the time comes, they have the same "right" to negotiate for it that you do. Get the picture?

There is NO conspiracy to go after the Avros simply because they have a different mission than the proposed aircraft and that was negotiated back in '98. It's more likely the cost of MX on the Avros will get so high over time they may just retire them.
No one said there was a conspiracy, those are your words. As you point out, the operating cost of the Avro, which your present contract artificially limits to 69-seats, will become substantially higher than the cost of a 70-sear CR7 operated at NW, under the terms of the contract within a contract that your MEC is proposing. If you are successful, the end result will be that the Avro's will be replaced by the CR7 because you will have undercut them, and the Mesaba pilots will lose those positions. Should that happen, you won't be having any heartburn over it.

YOU have decided that's OK because you think it all "belongs" to you anyway. Well, I hate to burst your bubble but it doesn't. What you get will be what you can negotiate. They have the same right at Mesaba to negotiate for that as you do. Maybe you don't like that but that's how it is. Just like you, they can "bid" whatever they want and YOU can't do D*ck about that. How you like them apples?

The NWA pilots are not underbidding anyone because there are NO other bidders. Either NWA pilots fly 70 seaters or no one does.
Since we do not know what compensation you have proposed we can't really accuse you of "underbidding" as yet. However, we do have the example of your buddies at USAirways and they DID underbid everyone to establish MAA and get that flying. What you appear to be proposing does not seem to be much different from what they have done. To make your airline "competitive" for this type of flying, your other costs will have to be offset, not just pilot pay. The probability that you will lower pilot pay to do that is quite likely, just as they did. If you do, you WILL be underbidding others that fly this equipment elsewhere. There are no "other bidders" at NWA right now, but there are other competitors with the same equipment. Believe it or not you don't operate in a cocoon isolated from the rest of the industry. The only thing necessary for "other bidders" is someone with the balls to do it. Remember that and don't crow before the sun rises, the noise is only attracting the butcher.

You may be in love with red tails, but my tails are red,white and blue and I like them better than red.

The last thing is that if they decided to develop another carrier, they can give every last one of the 70 seaters to that carrier and Mesaba and Pinnacle can't say D**k.
That is true. It is also true that Mesaba and Pinnacle can bid to fly the 70-seaters for less than this "other carrier" you are mentally creating, in which case it may never "develop". Why shouldn't they do that? Because you don't approve? You can take that white horse and ride off into the sunset. Who really cares what you approve, besides you?

ARE WE CLEAR ON THIS????
Are YOU? Let me help you .... the world does not revolve around the opinions of NWA ALPA. The sooner you understand that the better you will feel about yourself.

Those are the facts and I will get off my soap box now.. Thanks..
Looks like your "facts" are pretty confused with your opinions. Maybe you need a taller soap box? Want to borrow mine?
 
surplus1 said:
If you're not happy with that, you can withdraw your services.
You can practice what you preach. Oh wait, I forgot. You don't do THAT, either. Well...I'll be waiting for my ticket to that historic event, also.

In fact, I'll even annoint you my first ever honorary title...

YOU are a fargin dooshbahg.

(Standing by for some of your rousing melodrama...) :rolleyes:
 
quote:
"Looks like your "facts" are pretty confused with your opinions."


Thats funny.....your's are the same way:

"However, we do have the example of your buddies at USAirways.."
"What you APPEAR to be proposing ......." (my emphasis added)
"The probability that you will lower pilot pay to do that is quite likely..."

Yep...looks like you yourself have alot of "facts" with regards to what is happening at NW.


"What you get will be what you can negotiate. "

Thats right....and they already negotiated all flying above 55 seats via their scope.



"Since we do not know what compensation you have proposed we can't really accuse you of "underbidding" as yet. "


But you are already doing that with you statement: "If you are successful, the end result will be that the Avro's will be replaced by the CR7 because you will have undercut them,...."

How can you say we haven't undercut anybody yet, and then go on to say that if we are successful, the avros are going to go away because we underbid somebody??? Again, this looks like speculation, not the facts.
 
Last edited:
.......

Disregard.....looks like they extended the "edit" time-frame. Couldn't change it earlier......???

(removed correction to last paragraph)
 
Last edited:
surplus1 said:
Touchy are we?


Now YOU listen carefully. NWA ALPA doesn't own any flying, you just think you do. The flying belongs to the Company, all of it...

...Looks like your "facts" are pretty confused with your opinions. Maybe you need a taller soap box? Want to borrow mine?
Thanks for the post Surplus1. I know that I don't have the technical background in airline unions that some you guys do, but I do read a lot of discussion here and other places. I did hold an Alpa number with Mesaba for a short time, so I do find this story interesting.

Should be interesting watching this 70 seater thing unfold.
 
FN FAL,

Both surplus and redtailer are correct with regards to who "owns" the 70 seat flying.

Surplus is ultimately correct in that it is NW management that owns all the flying, mainline, feeder, or whatever.

However, there is an agreement in place (signed by the same management) that says all flying of 56 seats and greater will be given to mainline if management wants to do said flying. In the here-and-now, management can not just give that flying to whoever they want to. They agreed, 6 years ago, that it would go to mainline. So, for now, you can say that mainline "owns" that flying as well. (maybe an "exclusive lease" is better..??)

Yes, yes...I know.....It is not "forever." But this current proposal is now, under the current contract. You can speculate on what "could-might-kinda sorta-maybe" happen in future contract negotiations, in a bankruptcy, the coming of the seven horsemen (7?), etc. etc.. But in the here-and-now, it "belongs" to mainline.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top