Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

No ASA For UAL

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Yep-

Maybe so, probably not. That sack of dog splooge would probably not tell you the truth if his life depended on it.

Personally-I think he is just turning the screws on the pilot group-to get everyone to vote in PBS..... He is pretending to dangle a carrot in front of our dumb asses that he couldn't possibly dangle in reality.

-Has anyone even stopped to consider the implications of upper management revealing important strategic plans to pilots in some recurrent training class? Even before this information is made public? I think it is pretty much illegal-just ask Martha Stewart.

-Hence- I think SH is totally full of it, and he is just trying to get everyone to jump on the PBS train as an act of desparation. If he were privy to such information, he would not be silly enough to share it with some blabbermouth pilots! SH doesn't srtike me as a Mensa member-but he could not possibly be that retarded.

-B.S. Flag going up-Sky High!

If this is the case then he and the rest of the company, including the assistants, are in on the fun. I disagree fully.
 
Again, the lawyers said it was ok to tell recurrent classes, but to actually put out a company memo is no good....

I mean, a memo is a memo! It's like...official.

Telling a recurrent class is not really disseminating information, it's just innocent banter. <sarcasm>
 
Either way, the best part of this is all of the overly-concerned, paranoid androids that are going to flood SH's email with "what's really happening here?" subject titled emails. I get immense pleasure from the thought of that alone.
 
Again, the lawyers said it was ok to tell recurrent classes, but to actually put out a company memo is no good....

I mean, a memo is a memo! It's like...official.

Telling a recurrent class is not really disseminating information, it's just innocent banter. <sarcasm>

True!!!

Just like the infamous SAPA memo that was out a few months ago that said there is going to be a specific new UAX carrier.
 
I was told I was wrong when I said you guys would not be flying for UAL, but I guess now you guys can tell us stuff no one cares about. Did you guys get a memo today saying your toilet paper is changing, if so, SOURCE or I own't believe it

So what is your source? You act like you are in the know - or is it just cuz you know it all?
 
Ya'll have what SH said in RGT wrong! He said something about ACAR paper being too expensive and that we were getting surplus UAL RFP-certified acar paper for a steal. It's true man.

But I also heard no deal on the UA thing too from someone high up in the training department.

Hoser
Roll Tide!
 
So bye bye 20 200's! Hello overstaffing and more downgrades, reserves and furloughs. (Yes, I am aware of the no furlough clause. Companies find a way around that).
If you are keeping score at home, that is about 100 Captain positions, and another 100 FO's to carry or that they will need to shed! Happy days are ahead.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top