Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

New Flight Dept????

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

CarjCapt

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2003
Posts
179
After being out of the "Corporate" business for almost 20 years (was with the airlines) I'm now being asked to evaluate the possibility of a large company purchasing a mid size jet (8 passengers w/apu).

There are so many different jets available the choices are many. They are looking at a Hawker 800. What is out there in the <10million range that would have a NBAA IFR range of 2200+ miles, say DCA/IAD to SLC.

Help.
 
Are they looking for a new or used airplane? You will have a plethera of options in the used market. BTW, you can pretty much rule out any trips from/to DCA.
 
Do you need 2200+ miles or KIAD to SLC w/reserves? KIAD to KSLC is 1700nm if you take the long way (SID/airways/STAR). We were doing a similar search and settled on the Falcon 50. If your longest leg is KIAD to KSLC you'll have some more options than we had.

Is eight pax the usual load or only every now and then?
 
gear_guy said:
Are they looking for a new or used airplane? You will have a plethera of options in the used market. BTW, you can pretty much rule out any trips from/to DCA.

Used

That is why I included IAD
 
You should be able to get an early '88-90 Challenger for about $10MM, or a DA50 of the same vintage. A Hawker 800XP in the $10MM range will be of the '00-01 vintage, just be sure you can get the range you want. And check the baggage requirements...the Hawker's a bit tight in that department.

Personally...I'd go for the DA50...such a fine airplane. If you're doing eight pax regularly any of these but the Challenger is a bit of a squeeze.
 
HMR said:
Do you need 2200+ miles or KIAD to SLC w/reserves? KIAD to KSLC is 1700nm if you take the long way (SID/airways/STAR). We were doing a similar search and settled on the Falcon 50. If your longest leg is KIAD to KSLC you'll have some more options than we had.

Is eight pax the usual load or only every now and then?

2200 IFR miles....which should cover IAD-SLC under the worst of conditions

which falcon 50...straight or EX
 
HMR said:
Do you need 2200+ miles or KIAD to SLC w/reserves? KIAD to KSLC is 1700nm if you take the long way (SID/airways/STAR). We were doing a similar search and settled on the Falcon 50. If your longest leg is KIAD to KSLC you'll have some more options than we had.

Is eight pax the usual load or only every now and then?

Up to eight pax...something less mostly
 
CarjCapt said:
2200 IFR miles....which should cover IAD-SLC under the worst of conditions

which falcon 50...straight or EX
The EX has better avionics and performance #'s. We looked at the Challenger also. The boss lost interest after the recent CL accidents. It's hard to beat the CL cabin. I have not flown either A/C, I've just been knee deep in research. Guys like G100 and Falc Capt will surely offer better advice.:)

Here's a link for some Falcon 50 (non EX) tech stuff.

I've got a bunch of airplane comparison info I've compiled. I'll PM you when I find it. Our dept got A LOT of help via PM's from members on this board.
 
CarjCapt said:
2200 IFR miles....which should cover IAD-SLC under the worst of conditions

which falcon 50...straight or EX
You won't touch a 50EX for anywhere near $10M... However for what you are doing a straight 50 would work very well... Not sure on the range, but you might want to look into a Falcon 20F-5 retrofit (make sure it has the -5BR engines, not the -5AR)... About the same cabin as a 50 but less cost (and a bit less range, but should make IAD to SLC ok)
 
If you want to stay under budget go with the Hawker

I used to fly an HS-125 from DCA - LAS and would land with 2200 in the tanks. Depends on winds and PAX. The stand-up cabin is nice and you can get a newer Hawker for less than an older Falcon. If you had more money, I would choose the Falcon 50EX.

A previous poster had a good point about the bags, the Hawker is a bit tight, especially for skis. If it is just business luggage, it piles pretty high in the forward closet. plus, if you have at least one empty seat, there is additional room for bags.

The other draw back is the TKS system, but with a new Hawker that has been well maintained, it shouldn't be a problem.

Check the ADs and the RVSM mods.

It's all about how much you really want to spend vs. what equipment you can buy.
 
what do 900b's go for these days??

I know you said mid-size but the 50 cabin is claustrophobic!

As far as ruling out the challenger b/c of the ice problem....well...just de-ice it. Cant beat that cabin for the price. Problem is, people like thier 601/604's so much they are keeping them!!
 
Go For the DA-50!!!!!

Unquestionably the best "domestic" airplane available IMHO.
I have NEVER known a flight dept. where the missions didn't get longer or into more demanding airports as time progresses. Today its IAD to SLC, tomorrow it'll be IAD to SAN or SEA and you'll be cursing that Hawker or 20F you purchased. You should also consider the improved hot/high perf. you get with the 50. Nothing like departing ASE in the summer and being able to get beyond APA or GJT for a fuel stop. When the boss decides he wants to get in and out of that uncontrolled 4000' strip in BFE what aircraft is gonna get you there and back better than the 50? Check the V speeds and TO/landing distances. Lastly, it may not seem important now but trust me, the baggage compartment on the 50 is huge for an aircraft of its size and no one likes hauling the crew and pax gear into the cabin on a Hawker or DA-20F.
Bottom line, in your price range you will not find a better aircraft which will do it all as well the DA-50.
PM me if you want/need any specific info.

Rice
 
I agree 100% with Rice, but it will cost more money

rice said:
Unquestionably the best "domestic" airplane available IMHO.
I have NEVER known a flight dept. where the missions didn't get longer or into more demanding airports as time progresses. Today its IAD to SLC, tomorrow it'll be IAD to SAN or SEA and you'll be cursing that Hawker or 20F you purchased. You should also consider the improved hot/high perf. you get with the 50. Nothing like departing ASE in the summer and being able to get beyond APA or GJT for a fuel stop. When the boss decides he wants to get in and out of that uncontrolled 4000' strip in BFE what aircraft is gonna get you there and back better than the 50? Check the V speeds and TO/landing distances. Lastly, it may not seem important now but trust me, the baggage compartment on the 50 is huge for an aircraft of its size and no one likes hauling the crew and pax gear into the cabin on a Hawker or DA-20F.
Bottom line, in your price range you will not find a better aircraft which will do it all as well the DA-50.
PM me if you want/need any specific info.

Rice

I agree the mission will most likely change, then the extra money spent will be well worth it.
 
Especially if you're going to do long sectors, I'd recommend an older, mod-ed Challenger. Even with 8 pax it's roomy, has plenty of baggage space, and you won't find a more comfortable cockpit. And unless you're going to be making hot/high departures out of ASE every week, as a pax I'll take the occasional 30 minute Challenger tech stop over being sardined-in with 7 (or 5, or 3) other pax on a Falcon 50.

As far as the Hawker, it would be my last choice based on less-than-Falcon perfomance and less-than-Challenger comfort.
 
DA-50. 440 KTS. 2400 LBS HR @ 380. Max Gross out of 4500 FT part 91. Coast to Coast any day. 7 to 10 million for mid time aircraft. Look for the DEECS mod or the upgraded engines. Cheers.
 
I know you said mid-size but the 50 cabin is claustrophobic!

This coming from a Global Express pilot.

Kinda makes me laugh.

The cabin is pretty big compared to what I fly. I guess it is all relative
 
If they're open to extra money, how 'bout a used DA2000? Nearly identical cabin to the CL series, much better performance, quieter, more fuel efficient. When you find one on the market, you'll probably be looking at ~$14-16M. Otherwise, I'd try as suggested, the DA50s.

2000Flyer
 
Capthuff said:
This coming from a Global Express pilot.

Kinda makes me laugh.

The cabin is pretty big compared to what I fly. I guess it is all relative


yup- no doubt all relative.

A Global at hour 13 is just as claustrophic as that Lear at hour 3.

:D .
;) .

601-vs-DA50 -- I would take a fuel stop and a bigger cabin over that 50 anyday....then again, I couldnt afford to paint one nevermind buy one so my opinion means jack$hit (as usual)
 
Last edited:
The Falcon 50 is a wonderful airplane. Keep in mind, though, that they are getting old and having various age-related problems-- corrosion, especially.

If your principal can swing the up-front cost, an alternative to the 50 could be a new Citation Sovereign-- similar size cabin, slightly shorter range, slightly slower, but much cheaper to operate. The Sovereign was designed to do anything an 800XP can do, and do it better. Something to think about, anyway.
 
It all really depends on what the boss wants. All the mentioned aircraft will do what he wants done.

G3. Support from Gulstream is fantastic. I have heard it is not as good on the G2s and 3s as it is with the 4s and 5s. But it is much better than Ski-doo Jet. Yu can get a good one for well under $10m. But it comes down to either you pay upfront or you pay later. Later with the G3 is fuel bills. And it appears to be much more aircraft than you boss needs.

Challenger. Support $ucks. Period. Skidoo can not spell support let alone customer service.. Plus you add the fact that the aircraft seems to be very unforgiving of airframe icing and w&b issues. More so than most other bizjets.

DA50. Excellent high hot performance. Overbuilt, so it is heavier than most other aircraft per pound of gross weight. High time aircraft not a problem. I used to fly a 20 with over 27K hours. Still a solid airframe. DA20 flight controls used to leak hydraulics quite a bit. I have not heard much of this sort of problem in the 50's. TFE731s are reliable engines. Lots of mods available.

Hawker. Solid airframe. typically british construction. TKS is a bloody pain in the arse. Again TFE 731 are reliable with several engine mods available. 700s are underpowered dogs. 800s have much better performance. My biggest issue with the 800XP is that it is built by Raytheon instead of BAE. Raytheon is not hawker type people and they put TRs on the aircraft as standard. If you look at all the BAE built aircraft, you will see very few with TRs as the aircraft really doesn't need them. Just additional weight and maintenance cost. The rear coat closet if installed adds additional baggage space.

An important thing to keep in mind, DO NOT over buy. While it would be nice to fly a bigger aircraft, the department will not last too long if the boss is unhappy with the costs.
 
Rick1128 said:
An important thing to keep in mind, DO NOT over buy. While it would be nice to fly a bigger aircraft, the department will not last too long if the boss is unhappy with the costs.

Important point #2, DO NOT BUY AN AIRCRAFT WHICH JUST BARELY MEETS YOUR NEEDS TODAY!!!!!! Boss will not be happy when the airframe limits his mobility in the near future, (yeah I know you found him the one that fit his current needs) and he now has to go buy another plane to replace it. JMHO, but I've been down this road before.
A good rule is over buy by about 15-20% of what your needs are today. Usually allows for a bit of growth in mission without breaking the boss' bank. If played right it also shows your ability to look into the future while being concious of current costs.
 
Don't know about the Falcons but those Hawkers are great airplanes....Built like tanks and great reliability....I miss mine... I flew 800XP with honeywell...Comfortable cockpit as well
 
I have been down this road before also. But you still don't over buy. If he needs a Lear 35 now, you do not buy a Gulfstream because someday he "MAY" fly to Hawaii. You buy a Hawker or a Lear 60 or the like because his company will grow to utilize that aircraft. Then again, you also need to ask him what he intends to use the aircraft for. Is it to grow the company or for his personal transportation? I have also seen companies that have purchased too large an aircraft for their needs or their future needs and the department didn't last too long. There has to be a practical limit to how far in the future you look.

My biggest issue with Hawkers is their maintenance schedules. If you fly alot they can be frustrating.

rice said:
Important point #2, DO NOT BUY AN AIRCRAFT WHICH JUST BARELY MEETS YOUR NEEDS TODAY!!!!!! Boss will not be happy when the airframe limits his mobility in the near future, (yeah I know you found him the one that fit his current needs) and he now has to go buy another plane to replace it. JMHO, but I've been down this road before.
A good rule is over buy by about 15-20% of what your needs are today. Usually allows for a bit of growth in mission without breaking the boss' bank. If played right it also shows your ability to look into the future while being concious of current costs.
 
It's good to see someone with the charge of starting a new department and ego is not part of the process. Kudos to you for shooting striaght. Here is some more of that straight shooting. If this offens anyone, I'm sorry, but lets call a spade a spade.


G3.
Like previously mentioned, the support is unbeatable. I know Gulfstream has a G100/Astra that the person answering the phone has the authority to launch to solve an AOG problem. That says a lot. I do not know if they support something as old as a GIII, but they might. With that said, a GIII would be a poor choice. In the not too distant future, there will be so few airports that allow that plane to operate to and from that your choices will be limited. It's because of the gas guzzling engines and the noise they make. Say what you will about hush kits and all that jazz, but forget it. They are noise beasts and they will not change no matter what is done to try and quiet them up. You'll then be stuck with it. Nobody going to buy that thing from you with all it's issues. This plane is a great performer. 3K FPM all the way into the 40s. It's fast too, but the noise is a deal breaker. If some salesman tried to push that on you, please send him packing. Great airplane for making noise and helping you lose your job if the boss buys one on your reccomendation.

Challenger. Nothing can touch the Challenger's cabin. It's great. As mentioned previously, the support is disgusting here. I know 3 seperate operators that operate Bombardier porducts and were looking at another one of their products, and because of their support, the bombardier aircraft is now off the table. They make good airplanes, but if it's AOG and there is nobody to support it, what good is it. I think the folks in Canada are just lazy. I have also heard the Challenger 300 is a whole nother deal. Support, tech reps, ect are all seperate and they are kind of like their own company within a company. Distanced from Bombardier. It's my opinion is too little too late. You'll find a Bombardier apoligist from time to time. When that happens, ask him what the most commonly broken part on their aircraft is. Then tell them to call bombardier with you right there and ask how long it would take if you needed that part right away. Silence.............................Great 3000NM airplane.

DA50. All out GREAT airplane. I was surprised that nobody has mentioned that the 50 cannot be loaded to MGW. Not a limitation, but there is just so much available weight that you cannot get to it. Will a full bag of gas and seats full, you are still well over 1000 pounds away from MGTOW!!!! That leading edge slat will get you slow and in and out of Aspen year round. Lose 2 engines and it'll still go on 1! Hook it up right and it'll rip the gates off of hell. Forward speed in the climb: You don't have to give up one to get the other. Will climb at 280+ all day long to .80. YOu'll be moving along across the ground all the while keeping an impressive ROC. You realy can't go wrong here. PArts can be expensive, but a call to TEB will get them Fedex or C2C in short order. Landing gear is built like a tank. You could land that plane on a carrier. Great 2500NM airplane.

Hawker. Good airplane. West to East all year long no problem. East to West all year long as well, but you'll have to fly it at LRC .70! It'll take a long time to get to where you aer going. TKS works great, but you must keep them active, even when not expecting icing. If you drip the wings on the ground for 5 minutes before each flight, problems will be few. What happens is the WX gets nice and people forget about doing this. IT also allows you to see which panels are working and which ones are not. If you do this, you'll have a great Anti-ice system with few problems. No matter the WX, drip those wings on the ground. 700s are dogs. People buy them with TRs and have them removed. No other reason than the performance penalty. At altitude, you'll notice the the extra 550lbs when you are trying to accelerate. You have to climb a Hawker fast, or it will just hang there at the TOC. In an 800A, 280/.68 is about as slow as you want to get it if you want it to speed up right away at cruise. That'll give you a decent, not great, but decent ROC and a great speed across the ground. Baggage space is for the birds, otherwise a good airplane. This is a great 1000-1400NM airplane. It'll do more, but the cabin will start to close in on you.
 
757, correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the G100/Astra for aircraft under warranty only? I do not believe that a GIII would qualify.

PS BTW the CL-601/604 cabin is quite noisy. One of the reasons we did not purchase. The engines are very close to the "living" section of the cabin.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom