Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No one does-
Under current regs 'transportation local in nature' counts as free from duty
And that's why the work is being outsourced. FAA rules that prevent the rest abuse may make outsourcing of labor less cost effective, thus causing some of the flying to return to the major carrier, thus getting some jobs for those who have been on the bottom for too long.the smaller carriers will always have scheduled reduced rest as long as it's legal and will be pressured to work fatigued.
I can't remember the last time I had an overnight of less than 9 hrs. So the only way this would be an improvement is if it is as has been stated: hotel check in to airport show time. Otherwise its the same old pig, different lipstick.
I totally agree. Let's define rest as rest. Check-in to check-out, whatever time they come up with, that becomes a sterile period. No transportation, no security, no duties, nothing in that period. Even if they made this sterile period only 8 hours at least it would be a fence around rest that no one could waive, touch, infringe upon, no matter what irregular operation du jour is going on. It would be the Whitlow Rule.Needs to be check-in to check out. This "transportation, local in nature" doesn't seem to account for the growing trend of shuttles that ONLY leave at 30 minute intervals. At some airports, you might have to leave the hotel more than an hour before show time, because of length of drive, airport layout, security, etc.
Geez, louise, you hit the nail on the head on that one.Exactly. When a cost (unavailability for duty) is attached, airlines won't be so quick to pick a hotel 29 minutes away to save $8 a night, while they steal an hour of the crew's rest (round-trip) in the process.