Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

New E-175

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I wish I could fly such a big airplane. :( I would even fly if for 50 seat rates and no work rules.


Man, flight info has just gotten to the point where I can no longer bring myself to browse here. I have never witnessed a more unprofessional group of individuals on one site. Discussions about IPODS, backpacks, name calling, etc. I am ashamed to associate myself and my proffession with 40% of the pilots on here. We need to be one voice as PILOTS but instead we are all acting like children against each other. No wonder why MGMT always tries to low ball us, because we are all just an immature group of unprofessional, un-unified children.
 
Man, flight info has just gotten to the point where I can no longer bring myself to browse here. I have never witnessed a more unprofessional group of individuals on one site. Discussions about IPODS, backpacks, name calling, etc. I am ashamed to associate myself and my proffession with 40% of the pilots on here. We need to be one voice as PILOTS but instead we are all acting like children against each other. No wonder why MGMT always tries to low ball us, because we are all just an immature group of unprofessional, un-unified children.
Thank you for your time here. Good bye.
 
I hope no one that see's that picture gets excited. If you do, you do not see the whole picture. The more of these "little-big planes" that are around, the less chance we have of ever moving on to a major. Personally, I would have much rather flown a B-1900, Saab-340 or EMB-120 for 3-4 years and gone to mainline than end up in the jumbo shrimp for my entire life. Yeah its a cool looking airplane, but it is not a good trend, so enjoy it....because soon we will have no where to go.
 
Man, flight info has just gotten to the point where I can no longer bring myself to browse here. I have never witnessed a more unprofessional group of individuals on one site. Discussions about IPODS, backpacks, name calling, etc. I am ashamed to associate myself and my proffession with 40% of the pilots on here. We need to be one voice as PILOTS but instead we are all acting like children against each other. No wonder why MGMT always tries to low ball us, because we are all just an immature group of unprofessional, un-unified children.

The way i see it..as long as the "filth" stays on FI and doesnt spill into the terminals and airplanes. Whats wrong with it?
 
I hope no one that see's that picture gets excited. If you do, you do not see the whole picture. The more of these "little-big planes" that are around, the less chance we have of ever moving on to a major. Personally, I would have much rather flown a B-1900, Saab-340 or EMB-120 for 3-4 years and gone to mainline than end up in the jumbo shrimp for my entire life. Yeah its a cool looking airplane, but it is not a good trend, so enjoy it....because soon we will have no where to go.


Yeah, you'll have somewhere to go. Sooner or later all the legacy carriers will get back on their feet. Once they're financially stable they will start taking back all the flying they have lost over the past 5 years. CRJ-200s and ERJ 135/145s will head to the desert, leaving the regionals with 70 seaters and EMB 170/175s while the legacy guys fly anything over 100 seats. The fleet size at your average regional will be cut in half practically overnight, and there will be massive furloughs at the regional level as the mainline carriers begin to reabsorb the flying. Regional CEOs will feel the pain as the start dusting off their resumes while they try to explain the "temporary dip in earnings" to their shareholders. While it will, obviously, be temporarily catastrophic to the junior guys at the regionals when the music stops, it will be the first positive step to reestablishing this profession. Jobs will open at the majors and attrition at the regionals will return to 1999-2000 levels. "Feeders" will feed while majors fly the majority of the trunk root structure. Things will be good for all until the next downturn.

There's my "I have a dream" speech for you.

Or, the ATA and the politicians will continue to let this profession be Wal-Martized until pilots are replaced by "seat occupants" because quality people will no longer be interested in the profession. Accident rates will go up, and the software engineers will be forced to develop better automation. The "seat occupants" will then be relatively protected from their own inexperience. Because the job will then be on par with that of a bus driver, wages will be able to be kept low. On the bright side, when you go to recurrent every year, you will no longer be forced to listen to long-winded discussions on single-engine climb gradients or hydraulic system redundancies. For the benefit of the lowest common denominator, you will now be forced to listen to long-winded discussions on the best method of pressing the "easy button" so that the "seat occupants" can go back to reading about Anna-Nicole's autopsy and Brittney Spears' buzz cut. You, the professional pilot, will be an anachronism. You will be John Henry in the age of the steam hammer. You will be the American coal miner in the age of continuous mining machines. You will be the bank teller in the age of ATMs and online banking. You get the idea.

There's my "I have been to the mountaintop" speech for you.

It's a 50/50 proposition the way I see it.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top