Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

New CAL 737 Bases DEN / ORD

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The UAL side wasn't trimmed to make it a better fit. It was trimmed because of financial reason tied to not being productive enough in their eyes and years of mismanagement. Higher cost operation or higher waste operation? I agree with you that it's just widgets and they don't care about us. As far as profit margins, I don't know. I seem to remember UAL side making more money, but I don't know if it's just because of size or trimming the fat. But our growth was planned, our expansion was planned, and our ac deliveries were planned. All I can remember is furlough and cuts planned along with financial futures in question. I'm not bashing you or any other UAL pilot. I'm on board with all you guys, but to say that we're the cause of your reduction isn't accurate.
 
Andy-
Got a cliff notes version of what's delaying the jcba?
I have heard that mgmt is doing it's best to delay and fracture the two against each other- but that's just hearsay
 
Wave, my understanding is that it's due to unforeseen IT and infrastructure issues. Those issues don't allow the two sides to operate as one yet.
For management, the cost of a new contract is somewhere in the ballpark of $600 million annually. If there's no positive impact to the bottom line of a new contract, why would the company rush in and sign a new contract? Like it or not, they're keeping expenses down until they need to implement a combined pilot workforce.

Since UCH has started to hire UAL furloughees at CAL, there's no incentive for them to recall those same pilots to the UAL side of the fence and then have to train other UAL furloughees on the CAL side. Now that the training pipeline is open on the CAL side of the fence, it would be very expensive to open the training pipeline on the UAL side of the fence.
Management will simply turn back 757 leases on the UAL side of the fence to keep the UAL pilot population static - no furloughs and no recalls.

The fastest way to a JCBA is getting past all of the IT and other integration issues.
 
Got it initially from a United crew in YVR. The FO was a few from the bottom and said that he thought he was done because he and 500 or so others got their letters with marching orders. He said the merger announcement came and it was cancelled. We toasted to luck over a few beers and he said he just wanted some stability in his life and for his family. I had a very good response from him and the Captain. Actually had a good time. It was nice to see how we all wanted the same thing. I then asked one of our local reps in IAH during a local meeting and they confirmed it as what they were told.
 
Both sides were right sized for the merger. Sadly, the United side was trimmed by parking the entire 737 fleet plus a few 747's for good measure.

From the horses mouth for those interested.

http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=1483922036
 
Got it initially from a United crew in YVR. The FO was a few from the bottom and said that he thought he was done because he and 500 or so others got their letters with marching orders. He said the merger announcement came and it was cancelled. We toasted to luck over a few beers and he said he just wanted some stability in his life and for his family. I had a very good response from him and the Captain. Actually had a good time. It was nice to see how we all wanted the same thing. I then asked one of our local reps in IAH during a local meeting and they confirmed it as what they were told.

There is a mis-interpretation going on. There have never been letters out to more than the 1437 originally planned furloughs that resulted from the parking of 100 aircraft in 2008. As a part of the voluntary furlough reduction program, 448 individuals who initially received involuntary furlough notices were not then furloughed. The last furlough date was November 11, 2009. No furlough notices were ever given subsequent to that date. You can find all of this information by accessing Skynet, then Flight Operations, then Recall and Furlough Information. As to your assertion that these furloughs were undertaken "because of financial reason" that is also wholly inaccurate.
 
New bid is coming out JAN 2011... Manpower planning is loading it today... You can see the new bases under standing system bid..

ORD 737

DEN 737

It makes you wonder what else mgt plans to cancel in the T&A agreement?

They way I read the language in the Transition Agreement is both parties have to agree to terminate the agreement in sections or as a whole.
 
13-A. Partial Termination.​
Unless the Parties agree otherwise, the Airline Parties
may jointly terminate the provisions of Sections 4-D (Domiciles), 7-A (Furlough
with regard to United Pilots only), 7-C (Flying Ratios), 7-D (Domicile and Base
Protection), and 9 (ALPA Travel), individually or collectively, at any time on or
after December 31, 2011, if the parties have not reached a tentative agreement on a

JCBA by that date.


Either side can terminate 4-D, 7-A, 7-C, 7-D, and 9 after 31 Dec with no JCBA. Needless to say, the only party that would want to terminate any of those sections is management.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top