I have several thoughts. I'll begin with this one. Speaking only for myself I can say that you’re just plain wrong about my comments. Perhaps I didn’t articulate clearly enough what I’ve been trying to say but here’s the essence of it: Believe it or not, age IS a factor in assessing the probable maturity level of any particular individual.
As for supporting evidence here are a few things you seem to have missed in your argument.
To whit:
1. You have to be 16 (in most states, if not all) to get a driver’s license.
2. You have to be 14 to solo in a glider.
3. You have to be 16 to solo in a powered aircraft.
4. You have to be 17 to get your private license.
5. You have to be 18 to get a commercial certificate.
6. You have to be 23 to get an ATP.
7. You have to be 25 to rent a car.
8. You have to start paying higher premiums for auto insurance when your kids reach 12 or 13.
Are you suggesting that these things occur in a vacuum? Every one of these things exists because something about a persons age can be directly correlated to an individual’s maturity level and experience – at least in part. It is silly to suggest that age has nothing to do with a person’s maturity level when there are so many clearly demonstrable instances in which it DOES.
Now, does this mean that the younger guys don’t have advantages? Absolutely not! Their unencumbered lives (no wife/kids) mean that their dedication to the job at hand is greater – or at least it has the potential to be. Their clarity of thought is what mine used to be – but now I’ve got a wife, kids, a mortgage, and I’ve got ”a crabgrass problem” (just a little Tim Allen “Men are Pigs” line – for the older guys out there). They can remember things like nobody’s business - just like I once could! personally I subscribe to the "useless BB" theory on this - too many things stuffed in = things coming out the other side.
But they, in general, have very little experience. Now, this is not to say that they don’t have a lot of flight time – they might well have. But I DO insist that flight time only gets you so far. Longevity is an important part of the equation – important enough that under the right combination of circumstances I might consider the number of years someone has been flying a particular aircraft type to carry more weight than their total time in it. Those years represent time to reflect and consider. They indicate the number of times a person has thought through entering winter or the thunderstorm season. They represent living one’s life as a pilot and remaining alive. It just takes time in the seat to pay the necessary dues. You said so in the very post I’m responding to. That doesn’t happen as you get younger. It happens as you get older.
So when I say that age has something to do with maturity, this is what I’m talking about. I don’t expect too many of the younger folks who’ve argued most fervently against this point to understand – they haven’t unplugged from the Matrix, so to speak – but I think nit’s important to understand that age DOES play a role in maturity level whether one likes it or not. Maturity, like most things in life operates on a continuum, which makes it difficult to assess in particular individuals based on key indicators. Age is however, IS a key indicator that is, more often than not, a pretty good litmus test. That’s why so many things in our society and in our profession have age related restrictions.
Now, before I move on I'd like to take exception to this part of you post because I think it's just inaccurate:
What about UAL 173 - the DC-8 in Portland that resulted from the attitude of the captain and fathered CRM training as a mandate?
What about DAL 191 - where the pilots were faulted for continuing their approach to DFW with an active cell on the final approach?
I could go on and on but rather than do so how about we just say that pilot error is a factor in considerably MORE than the majority of aircraft accidents, and that this is so stated in the NTSBs findings as published, and leave it at that.
By “gee whiz” I HOPE you’re not referring to a Gulfstream pilot per se (that’s usually what people mean when they say “gee whiz,” you know). And what does 1500 hours have to do with it, anyway?
There you go! You’ve hit the nail on the head here. I would just say that if you’re longevity in the business is high, you’ll be ready to be the CA In that thing sooner than a guy with twice your time in it and a lucky connection that got him the job at age 25. You’ve just thought the business of being off the ground over more times, more completely, and more effectively than he has.
TIS