Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Near misses on rise at U.S. airports, air traffic controllers under fire

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

DieselDragRacer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Posts
11,056
http://travel.usatoday.com/flights/...ts-air-traffic-controllers-under-fire/99005/1


The number of close calls and near-collisions at U.S. airports is steadily rising, leading some to point fingers at air traffic controllers.

"As many as one in four air traffic controllers at any given control center are novices, barely out of training, and some of the recent problems in the air provide a frightening picture of the near-accidents in the air that have been avoided," ABC News reports. "Many controllers are reaching retirement bringing in an abundance of new blood."


In March of this year, the National Transportation Safety Board began to require that such incidents be reported. Since then, there are nearly a dozen cases that NTSB is investigating, according to The Washington Post.


The Post took an in-depth look into this increase in near misses, citing an incident over Maryland involving a Continental aircraft in March. ABC looked at an incident in April when a Southwest aircraft experienced a close call with a helicopter in Houston. One month later, an air traffic controller reportedly directed a US Airways plane into the path of a departing aircraft in Anchorage.


Just last week, a United aircraft en route to D.C.'s Reagan National Airport that nearly collided with a private jet departing from nearby Washington Dulles International Airport, according to the Post. In this instance, it was an on-board warning system that notified the aircraft, not air traffic control.


"It's the air traffic controller that's supposed to control this situation" John DeLisi, deputy director of aviation for NTSB, told the Post. "When it had to kick in and do its thing, that wasn't a good controller."


According to the Post, the Washington-metro area has already had more near misses reported in the past six months than last year's total of 18. The paper reported that air traffic controllers made 949 errors last year.

As with any time this topic comes up in the media, most point fingers at the inexperienced controllers and old technology. A new system is being developed, but even that is controversial and expensive. In a statement to ABC, Federal Aviation Administration officials say this rise in near misses is not due to inexperienced controllers,
 
Just talked with a Frontier guy the other day on the employee bus, he was still all worked up (and rightfully so!) over a near miss with SWA in OAK, due to controller error. Near the marker, hazy vmc, and atc trying to shove everyone off on visuals even though the airport wasn't in sight or preceeding a/c. refused the visual several times only to be vectored into an inbound SWA resulting in a tcas RA, real deal.

We all need to be extra vigilant and eyes/ears on the lookout, atc is responsible for separation in radar environment...but ultimate responsibility is OURS, and it's OUR butts in the sling....not the newbie atc guy/gal.
 
This appears to be the result of a US govt on autopilot for the last ten years while we searched for weapons of mass destruction and collectively wet our pants over a handful of fruitcakes armed with boxcutters. The hard work of actually administering a govt was deferred in favor of thrill of the moment political grandstanding. Most ATC systems are now packed with students attempting to control traffic with little supervision. This problem has been a long time coming and did not recieve the interest it required years ago. One bright spot, it appears ATC specialist will be allowed back into the cockpit soon. This will allow the new controllers to see the results of their efforts, along with the problems that result.
 
This appears to be the result of a US govt on autopilot for the last ten years while we searched for weapons of mass destruction and collectively wet our pants over a handful of fruitcakes armed with boxcutters. The hard work of actually administering a govt was deferred in favor of thrill of the moment political grandstanding. Most ATC systems are now packed with students attempting to control traffic with little supervision. This problem has been a long time coming and did not recieve the interest it required years ago. One bright spot, it appears ATC specialist will be allowed back into the cockpit soon. This will allow the new controllers to see the results of their efforts, along with the problems that result.

Totally agree with the above.
Maybe it is just me but it seems we complain when we get slowed, vectored for spacing etc. into hubs when ATC is running increased separation on final due to new "snitch" programs that automatically tell on a controller when separation on final is momentarily lost. Yet when the controllers are trying to "make it happen" on VFR days, I hear some pilots not doing their part and looking for the traffic to follow and or not calling the field if there is a single puffy cloud in between them and the rwy. We have to do our part too to maximize flow into the hubs.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top