AiRegency
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2007
- Posts
- 217
Yeah.... There was a day where the rest of the professional pilot community would not have rallied around this poor guy's indiscretion.
A few quick questions to all of you joining in the fray here....
-Did you ever push the 12 hour rule just a little bit???
-Did you ever get naked with your wife/girlfriend/friend of the day is a semi-public place?
-Did you ever in your life run from the cops? Did you ever in your life feel like you were about to have to run from the cops?
If this guy hadn't gotten caught and you had heard about his escapades from a "friend of a friend", how many of you would have been standing in line to give him a high five for "gettin' some"???
Why, exactly, do we feel the need to "pile on" when one of ours gets his name in the paper for a little bad judgement?? Yeah, he f'ed up. It happens. Harping on it and ranting away about "professionalism" doesn't help the situation, especially when many of you haven't been in the working world nearly long enough to know what professionalism is and what professionalism isn't....
Non-pilots and media types do read this website. While I understand that many of you have not been around long enough to fully witness the beating our profession has taken over the past seven years, is it too much to ask that you show a little restraint, show some support for your fellow pilots, and not contribute to the continuing effort to degrade what we do for a living??
It's called decorum. Look it up.
The reason people "pile on" is because they want to send the clear message that we, as their peers, do not find this to be respectable behavior. A "little bad judgement"? Are you kidding me? This is exactly what I'm talking about. If we all had your attitude about it then it would reinforce this rediculous idea that it is somehow "cool" to act that way. It isn't.
And there you go again PCL 128. You say in one thread that you codemn this type of behavior and then you turn around in another and want to have a pitty party for somebody that has phenomenally poor decision making ability. You make the bed you sleep in. I refuse to support somebody that behaves that way. Doing so condones it. There's a big difference between "pushing" the 12 hour rule and blowing it out of the water before partaking in lude and lascivious behavior.
As for FmrFrtDog... Have I ever considered running from the cops? This question reveals a lot about you. I have never been chased by the cops. I've had a ton of good times in my life with more to come and I manage just fine to do so while living within the laws set by our companies, communities, states, nation, what-have-you.
PCL 128, if I have picked up on things correctly then it would seem that you hold some sort of union possition at 9E. If that's the case then that puts you in a possition of authority and your peers will have an ear for what you have to say. You would best serve your coworkers by simply taking the stance that the union will do what it can for him but simultaneously wants to send a clear and resounding message that that behavior will not be tolerated. There is an ALPA code of conduct or ethics posted somewhere I'm sure. Reinforce that, not these childish, drunken frat party antics.
I want to be clear about one thing here. It is not my intention to pick on this kid anymore. I'm picking on this attitude that wants to let his behavior slide. That's the topic at this point. Encouraging, supporting, condoning, turning a blind eye or otherwise down playing the significance of this only serves to set the stage for it to happen again. That's what I have a problem with. But to address this attitude unfortuneately involves having to discuss his specific irresponsilities. Until you send that message to your peers, PCL 128, I guess we will just be standing by waiting to hear the next Letterman top 10 list centered around another one of your pilots.
Last edited: