erj-145mech said:
If you were at 8 g's, where would you have the power set at?
well, just off the top of my head, I'd think I would have a fairly high power setting, because in an 8g turn, I'd be bleeding energy pretty rapidly. But then I've never flown an unlimited aerobatics plane.
I have never heard of power setting being a limiting factor for acceleration loads. Why would it be. If you're pulling 8 g in a turn, you're pulling 8g that's what the wings feel, they don't feel the power setting.
Additionally, RPM in generally used very little in power settings compared to throttle setting. Remeber this is an engine with a constand speed prop. Manifold Pressure usually plays a much more sgnificant role in settng power. So why aren't there little "g" stickers on the maniold pressure gauge?
So, let's accept for a moment that you are correct. look at the stickers, they are evenly spaced, so the nmissing "2g" sticker, would be at about 92 percent. meaning that if you pull 2 gs, you gotta pull the power back in a 2g turn, or you risk damaging the airplane, according to your theory. Now, I dunno about you, but every plane I've flown is capable of 2 gs, 60 degree bank is 2g in a level turn. It's within the normal operating envelope for every certificated airplane. And I've never heard the you have to reduce power in a 2g turn to avoid airframe damage. So, you're saying that a power setting that any normal or utilitary category aircraft will withstand with no difficulty, will endanger the structire of an SU-31, one of the toughest unlimited aerobatics planes made?