Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Mu Readings

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Yes, but I still think they could be reported in a simpler manner with good, fair, poor, nil. Rather than the numbers, that's just my opinion though and now it's not as bad since it's been explained alittle better.
Would be perfectly adequate long as your AFM listed runway requirements as "a little", "some", "a fair amount", and "lots" ;)

Fly safe!

David
 
:laugh: Why not, that's the way I classify them!:laugh: But Since my AFM doesn't have MU numbers either it really doesn't help much. Matter of fact since Basically all the A/C I fly were built before 1977 the AFM isn't exactly a wealth of information.
 
Deleted
 
Last edited:
I just got two MU reports lastnight in KMHK and KOMA!
 
It is not in your flight release?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom