Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

More TSA BS!!!!!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
WWII took less time.....

Yep, and we still have folks out there who want to drive aircraft into buildings.

Age 65 took what a week after they put the bums rush on it what PAC was that?

There has been a move to raise the retirement age for many years. It gained significant traction when the ICAO raised the age to 65 and you would have foreign airlines flying over the US with pilots over 60, but US pilots on US airlines were prohibited from doing the same.

Absent any compelling reason to maintain an out dated restriction, the final vote between the House and the Senate was 496-0.

Do you really think ALP-PAC has the horsepower to stop that land slide?

Crew members are treated as suspects funding PACs has nothing to do with it.

Crewmembers are not treated as suspects, their identity is being verified. Learn to live with it.

A national union with a political hack mentality instead of a serve the workers mission is the reason....

Yeah, that's it. That's the reason. You broke the code. Now crawl back in your hole. :laugh:
 
Anyone know how much the people in the TSA make? Hypothetically speaking for someone with military experience and a masters in aviation?

It seems like their QOL must far exceed anything the airlines can offer.

Might be a good career move for any current airline pilots, (if the pay is right of course!)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top