Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Midwest 717's to DAL?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
No the 9 is going away. The replacement for that flying is Next Gen RJ's as stated in the argument outlined this week.
A 717 would be additional a/c. This will be the business stance.
 
Yes (Cal) does. The 737 is operated much the same way. The glass has round dials presented on the PFD's and not speed and altitude tape.
Not sure if you could get Boeing to write a program for that.
The 737's and 767-400 were done because of WN's insistence on the 737's they own. (300's)
 
Oh good grief....

Now the 717 isn't a replacement type for the DC-9?? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the seat count is virtually the same right??

So, a 76 seat rj is a replacement for the -9, but an aircraft that uses the same type rating and has virtually the same number of seats is not a replacement.

Riiiight....

spin spin spin
 
No the 9 is going away. The replacement for that flying is Next Gen RJ's as stated in the argument outlined this week.
A 717 would be additional a/c. This will be the business stance.

Now that's funny! I'll have to credit you this, you guys sure do shoot for the stars. I wish my MEC did the same.

Schwanker
 
I am just stating how the lawyers would argue the points.
Said defendant stated that the DC-9's are being replaced by the 76 seat DCI jets. correct?
Correct.
Well then why are you calling these 717's replacements when the above said DC-9 has already been replaced by a RJ?

See the point. Can't contradict your self to a court of law or an arbitrator. Literally I mean this totally TIC.
 
Nevermind ....
 
Last edited:
AAI is parking 717's.....

Not sure where you're getting that information. We sold a single 717 to Hawaiian. That's it. We still have 86 717s, and no current plans to park any of them.
 
Great, we are already starting the red vs green show part II. Better get the merger committees going on this arbitration.
 
Not sure where you're getting that information. We sold a single 717 to Hawaiian. That's it. We still have 86 717s, and no current plans to park any of them.

No, he's right. We're parking them on Concourse C, D, and sometimes E...not to mention all the other cities we park them at.;)
 
I pulled up the a/c plot the other day to look at some tail #'s and saw a few 717's with long parking times(a couple of months) listed in MCO....has anyone seen a few parked down there?
 
No the 9 is going away. The replacement for that flying is Next Gen RJ's as stated in the argument outlined this week.
A 717 would be additional a/c. This will be the business stance.


The DC9's CAN NOT be replaced solely by "RJ's" it is in OUR, meaning DAL's, scope language. Its no secret that it couldn't be done under the NWA scope and now it cant be done under the DAL language. That is after all why we have scope language. (Should have been better language but none the less its there)
 
Great, we are already starting the red vs green show part II. Better get the merger committees going on this arbitration.

You know, this merger wasn't created to "fix" the mess the redbooks made with the greenbooks. Just because there is a lot of very senior narrowbody Captains at NWA doesn't mean they should just "slip" into one of our new 777s. That would be a "redbook" pilot's wet dream----those darn greenbooks can just avoid our NWA widebodies and go to ATL and fly something big over there....


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
You know, this merger wasn't created to "fix" the mess the redbooks made with the greenbooks. Just because there is a lot of very senior narrowbody Captains at NWA doesn't mean they should just "slip" into one of our new 777s. That would be a "redbook" pilot's wet dream----those darn greenbooks can just avoid our NWA widebodies and go to ATL and fly something big over there....


Bye Bye--General Lee

General,

I never said that this merger should/would fix the red/green debacle. What I said is that this thread is already sounding like the red/green show part II, meaning that every single airplane that is parked or added is arbitrated as to whether it is a replacement or new equipment.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom