Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Michael Boyd vs. 50 seat RJs

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I wonder if ten years down the road, there's gonna be a huge glut of 70-76 seaters that need to be rapidly dumped in the desert. It kind of seems that airlines are about to simply repeat the same mistake with bigger RJs.

No, I don't so. Remember, the 50 seat RJ was a new type of airliner and never before was a jet produced with such low seating capacity. In fact the first models by Embraer and Canadair were based on older biz jets. The newer crop or RJ's such as the e-170, 175, 190, 195 and the models coming on line from Canadair, Mitsubishi, and a few others are designed as RJ's except for the larger CRJ-700, 900, and 1000.
Fuel burn on the larger models is such that they have better economics and are better able to weather the spikes in jet fuel, at least so far.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom