These last two posts bring up an important point- Air carriers often have special authorizations at airports like this, but without knowing what sort of additional crew qualifications and required equipment are behind the "end result", I'm not sure how useful it is. Most common is a requirement that one of the pilots have been in there within a certain period of time . . . On the equipment side, some airports don't have a local altimeter setting available (and require higher mins), but the airline had their own "weather observer" providing a local altimeter setting, resulting in lower mins legal only for them.
Probably be better to require that one of the pilots have been in there previously before, and if that's not possible, I'd want something higher, like 3000' and 4 or 5 miles. I haven't been in there since they lengthened the runway, though, but the approach plate Humvee posted sure brings back memories (Spaceball1, you up?). That altitude of 6700 feet at 5 dme is a floor, btw, not a target, so I would keep that in mind, and stay in a nice, stabilized descent, not "dive and drive" to 6700. I like to be stabilized the whole way down to my wet, downhill runway. :laugh:
Going in there was fun, it's the kind of flying we don;t get to do very often in 121, and I miss being able to do what you are doing . . . planning for new places and actually using our brains for planning/flying, instead of bidding or arguing about #%$#@ seniority lists.
Regds,
Ty