Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Mesa Terminates Bid for Atlantic Coast

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Re: Re: I'm With You Shamrock

j41driver said:
Sinking ship? What sinking ship? The only sinking ships I see around here are United and USAirways. Isn't Mesa tied to both of those carriers? Now you tell me who's hanging on to a sinking ship.
Breaking away from business "partners" that go bankrupt and then try to misuse the laws to muscle the companies THEY are indebted to is a good move as far as I am concerned. My prediction.....UAL finally comes to ACA with their hat in hand like they should have done in the first place. ACA still does some United Express with the J41's and some RJ's. No limitations on Indy Air.
 
350 Driver:

You're envy is becoming obvious again.

There has to be a reason 97% of ACA pilots voted in support of Independence and against a Mesa takeover. Furloughous and all.

No hard feelings, though. You'll always be welcome to jumpseat on my Airbus.
 
Last edited:
350DRIVER said:
Good for Mesa, they surely don't need a company who's future is defintely up in the air, has furloughed guys on the street, lost routes, and finally had to go "independant" cause they were pretty much fuc$ed after they lost the routes.,.. ACA is nothing more than a horrible gamble (both short and long term) , just happy Mesa did not touch a "crashing damaged item." Obviously you can see the company who is continuing to hire (pilots too:D ), purchase new equipment, prosper, succeed, expand route structure, aquire other companies (Midway), etc, etc, etc. It would have sucked to have seen Mesa try and bail these guys out since in reality ACA probably could have brought Mesa right down the gutt(a) with em.


There is a God,

3 5 0


350,

ACA did not "lose" the routes. ACA had a firm 10 year deal with United to fly at least 122 CRJ's as United Express. When United went into Chapter 11, it elected to subvert the contracts with all United Express carriers by submitting all three of them (ACA, AWAC, Skywest) to a competitive bid process with a variety of other carriers, including Chatauqua, Mesa Air Group, Trans States and others. When ACA management evaluated the terms that United was insisting on, they simply said THANKS, BUT NO THANKS. The deal being offered by United involved too much exposure to long term risk and diminishing margins that were deemed unacceptable to ACA management and the company's board of directors. Therefore they elected to simply refuse every offer that United made and will continue to do so until UAL emerges from bankruptcy and cancels the contract with ACA.

ACA has $300,000,000 cash, one of the best balance sheets in the industry, 87 CRJ's flying for the United Express operation, and extensive infrastructure in place in Dulles and several outstations. Ornstein has publicly stated on several occassions that his biggest challenge is financing new aircraft and keeping pace with the scheduled growth. It does not take a genius to determine Ornstein's true motivation in launching this unsolicited bid for ACA.

Will ACA ultimately be successful as Independence Air? I don't know; neither do you. Only time will tell. I do think that the business plan is solid, Dulles is in need of a low cost/high frequency option, the infrastructure is in place, and the cost structure will be competitive once the A319/A320 series is brought into the mix to offset the higher CASM of the CRJ. Most importantly, the entire employee group is highly motivated and 110% behind the effort.

Mesa, on the other hand has several negative things "going for it". It is aligned with partners that are on shaky financial ground (put mildly), accepts deals with margins that are too slim for favorable financing terms, and is heavily leveraged. My personal opinion is that your CEO (if you work for Mesa) is taking you down a very self destructive path in the name of ego and "cashing in" on the opportune moment. I think history will reveal Mesa as one of those carriers that tries to expand too aggressively and ultimately implodes. I certainly do not wish for my fellow pilots to be out on the street. On the other hand, I feel that our profession would be much better off without the downward pressure that Mesa creates. That's a bit callous, I know, but your remarks concerning ACA were no less offensive to this former ACA pilot. Tit for tat, as they say.

At any rate, that's enough fun for tonight.
 
KingAirKiddo said:

My personal opinion is that your CEO (if you work for Mesa) is taking you down a very self destructive path in the name of ego and "cashing in" on the opportune moment.

Great post of accurate info. As to the quote above, I think it's fair to say that the ACA management team does care about providing a public transportation service and employment in the communities they serve. I believe those issues are just an annoyance to JO. Ultimately, that's why MESA will fail. The company isn't about serving anybody except JO.
 
350DRIVER

Mesa bail ACA out.. Please

Hmmmm. I'm trying to understand the logic behind your post. Mesa is a contract carrier for UAL and US Air. In case you had your head up your @ss for the last 3 years, I will fill you in on a little secret; they have been doing very badly.

ACA has been in control of there future with and without United since last December. If they wanted the UAL flying they could have it still today! Kerry Skeen has decided that continuing as a contract regional carrier is not in the best intrest of ACAI stock holders and the well being of its employees. I would rather invest in 240 million in the bank, Kerry Skeen, and the ACA employees, than a contract carrier with underpaid, overworked employees.
 
46Driver said:
My prediction - for all you that care (which is probably no one...). UAL realizes it is up the proverbial creek without a paddle. UAL either re-affirms the lucrative ACA contract or decides to codeshare with ACA. At any rate, I'm gambling and just bought a little ACAI stock while it was under $9 a share.

Merry Christmas!

I just covered my short on ACAI at just above $7.50/share; the stock's bouncing around too much. I'll take my $3.5K profit and wait until near the first quarter that ACAI has to report with reduced express revenues (before I short the stock again) ... I expect ACAI to post some pretty hefty losses. I do not see how ACAI will ever be profitable as Independence Air.
Good luck to ya; I still think that it's foolish to buy stock in the company that one works for; too many eggs in one basket.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top