Smoking Man
High Speed Aluminum
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2001
- Posts
- 561
KeroseneSnorter
Actually selling PSA would fix the 50/50 problem without having to change any language. If PSA was sold we would no longer be wholly owned, your LOA 83 or 84 whatever it is, states that any 70 seater placed at a Wholly owned will be staffed at 100% APL.
Nice of your guys to agree to that for us. (notice PSA,ALG,PDT did not agree to that, it was a Mainline MEC and MGT agreement). Also in your LOA a non wholly owned can fly 70 seaters at 50/50 as long as they have agreed to JFJ. That is why there is staffing problem on the 70 seaters at PSA.
Just catching up on the latest stuff out there, Looks like they are working hard at putting wording in the scope stuff so that PSA can be sold with minimal effort. I have heard rumblings about PSA and MESA, who knows. It does appear that PSA will get the 70 seaters at 50/50
Actually selling PSA would fix the 50/50 problem without having to change any language. If PSA was sold we would no longer be wholly owned, your LOA 83 or 84 whatever it is, states that any 70 seater placed at a Wholly owned will be staffed at 100% APL.
Nice of your guys to agree to that for us. (notice PSA,ALG,PDT did not agree to that, it was a Mainline MEC and MGT agreement). Also in your LOA a non wholly owned can fly 70 seaters at 50/50 as long as they have agreed to JFJ. That is why there is staffing problem on the 70 seaters at PSA.
Last edited: