Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Maintenance Test Flights

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Like most things in aviation, a "test flight" sounds a lot sexier than it really is.

Basically, you take off and see if they fixed the stupid thing yet. No special training required.

I've always been more nervous about maintenance ferry permits . . . .those f'n mechanics will sign off anything to get it back to base, and you're the one who's butt gets in a sling if anything goes wrong.

"Careless and reckless operation" is a very broad brush.


Have to agree with you here. I think it is important to have mx ride along for the stuff after heavy check... at my airline they do this no problems... Alsways very helpful guys. We used to have mx test pilots but now it falls on reserves. Seems to me it would be more cost effective to get a mx test crew that is more familiar with the checklists.
 
Ever done a maintenance test flight at your airline or do you have separate mx pilots for that purpose? If so, did the mx guys ride along? Any restrictions or guidelines?

Details... Thanks...

I did one or two at PCL, but I usually refused them unless it was something very benign. If anything was done to the primary flight controls or engines, then I told them no way. On the couple that I did do, the mx guy did ride along on the jumpseat.
 
I did one or two at PCL, but I usually refused them unless it was something very benign. If anything was done to the primary flight controls or engines, then I told them no way. On the couple that I did do, the mx guy did ride along on the jumpseat.

What they r giving us is a mostly rebuilt aircraft from long term storage to a ca with less than 100 hrs in type. A very long checklist.
 
What they r giving us is a mostly rebuilt aircraft from long term storage to a ca with less than 100 hrs in type. A very long checklist.

I'd tell them, politely, to *%&$ off.
 
I've always been more nervous about maintenance ferry permits . . . .those f'n mechanics will sign off anything to get it back to base, and you're the one who's butt gets in a sling if anything goes wrong.
quote]

Have to disagree with you. Not all f'n mechanics will just sign stuff off. Every plane I work on I treat as if my family were going to be flying on it. Sure there are hacks around but not all of us are.
 
Done several. Like the other guy said, it's generally a quick flight with a mechanic on board to see if they fixed the stupid thing....

The Feds took away our in house ability to write ferry permits. I've done three since that happened, and I like it a lot better with having a neutral third party looking at the airplane who doesn't care that the airline needs the airplane back in service an hour ago. All three times the mechanics agreed the airplane was safe to ferry, but told us they would refuse to sign it off we weren't comfortable with their diagnosis.
 
Soverytired, I also feel that saying those f'ing mechanics will sign off anything is a rather broad and ridiculous statement. That's as absurd as saying that every pilot out there will cut corners on the last leg of a four day trip just to get home. We both know thats not the case. I'm sorry if you've had a bad experience in the past with Maint. Of course you always have a few hacks that will sign anything off but the majority of us would never do anything illegal or to otherwise endanger you. I wouldn't sign off ANY disrepancy that I wouldn't put myself and/or my own family on that aircraft! I want you to make it home safely to your family just as I would if I were on a flight you were piloting. Just try not to lump all of us in the same boat!
 
Soverytired, I also feel that saying those f'ing mechanics will sign off anything is a rather broad and ridiculous statement. That's as absurd as saying that every pilot out there will cut corners on the last leg of a four day trip just to get home. We both know thats not the case. I'm sorry if you've had a bad experience in the past with Maint. Of course you always have a few hacks that will sign anything off but the majority of us would never do anything illegal or to otherwise endanger you. I wouldn't sign off ANY disrepancy that I wouldn't put myself and/or my own family on that aircraft! I want you to make it home safely to your family just as I would if I were on a flight you were piloting. Just try not to lump all of us in the same boat!

Well reasoned, temperate discourse is not exactly a virtue or a commonality on flightinfo.com.

Don't get your panties in a knot. I've had some bad experiences with questionable ferry permits and paperwork screw ups where I was asked to just "get it back to base" by either maintenance or by a chief pilot.

I'm happy to hear that my experiences are the aberration, not the norm. Still, one can only draw upon one's own experiences when forming a world view.
 
Here is one I heard from a colleague... Would you do a mx test flight on a totally rebuilt aircraft after it had been in storage,,,,, during t-storms all around the airport and total IMC 3000 ft ceiling from the airport to 50 miles? Response.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top