Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Looks like Denver controller got some love action on the job.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

coogebeachhotel

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 8, 2005
Posts
650
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/9931525/detail.html


DENVER -- The Federal Aviation Administration is scrambling for answers after Colorado's Congressional delegation is questioning how an air traffic control supervisor could be sexually involved with a subordinate controller on the job.

Government leaders want to know how this supervisor still has his job. The real question is what FAA rules and regulations allow a person with this kind of record to continue supervising controllers, they said.


The FAA is now getting rocketed with requests from Congress for information on just how often this is happening and where. In the high-pressure atmosphere of an air traffic control center, lives are on the line and the enemy is distraction.
FAA documents show that that supervisor Paul Conway had sexual relations with a female subordinate in his office while planes were in the air.

There are documented instances of Conway having other inappropriate contacts with female employees. His punishment was a 14-day suspension in 2005 but he is still a supervisor.

"Do you think I should be paying for your salary, the taxpayers should be paying for this kind of conduct, from a manager at an air traffic control center?" 7NEWS Investigator John Ferrugia asked Conway.

"Mr. Ferrugia, I think I've made it very clear to you, I have nothing to say to you," Conway replied.

"If an employee feels they can't be comfortable in the workplace, then that's going to affect the safety of the flying public because they can't do their job right," said Mike Fellows, who heads the controllers' union in Longmont.

He said there is double standard for FAA supervisors.

"In 2002, we had a similar case involving a bargaining unit employee and the case was proposed for removal," Fellows said. He said that employee was eventually removed.

"This is serious. This is crazy. We have to worry about personnel problems that's going to affect their attitudes and ability to concentrate on their job," said Sen. Wayne Allard.

After considering the results of 7NEWS' investigation, Allard is asking the FAA questions that extend beyond this one case.

"What kind of lawsuits have been filed? What kind of complaints have been sent to the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission? What kind of internal actions have been taken on these cases that apply to sexual misbehavior?" Allard asked. "So we are trying to really trying to look at this from a systemwide basis."

Conway's case has also grabbed the attention of Rep. Marilyn Musgrave.

"The FAA needs to remove individuals like this from their job. They need to terminate their employment. They need to take very seriously the responsibility they have protecting Americans when they fly. This is just outrageous," Musgrave said.

Musgrave said she has already talked with the deputy administrator of the FAA, who was unaware of the case but who is now investigating.

Allard has given the agency two weeks to respond to specific questions and produce information about sexual harassment and disciplinary action at all the FAA traffic centers. 7NEWS is hoping to hear from other controllers about the issue and will continue to investigate.

Have a question or comment on this story? Or have a news tip or story idea? Call us at 303-832-TIPS or e-mail us.
 
I'd like to know when all these congressmen and senators are going to start getting fired up about the working conditions that were imposed on the controllers by the FAA. It seems to me that the crappy conditions would have more of an effect on morale and job performance than some supervisor doing a subordinate.
 
I'm not making excuses for the Man....but what exactly takes place in a senators office with interns all day in the Hill?:rolleyes:
 
The real distraction is the bladder infection that requires her to pee every 5 minutes.......Now you know where that echo came from when talking to ATC.:beer:

Cheers

V1
 
Don't they know that only the President is allowed to have sexual relations in his office while planes are in the air?

Shame, shame.
 
There's a famous episode from the Caribbean, years ago. Kingston Center - I always picture a rasta-man with dreadlocks and a big bong at the radar - keyed the mike late one night, and proceeded to get serviced in the most pleasurable way imaginable. All the sounds came through loud and clear.

One happy controller and dozens of envious crewmembers airborne that night. :)
 
I don't see the problem :)

No loss of seperation for sure!
 
This would have been the best flight ever to be operating

"Higher?" "Approved"
"Direct?" "Approved"
Faster?" "Approved"
The guy was too busy to say no to any request. BTW, the reporter that is mentioned (John Ferrugia) was an investigative reporter in Kansas City when I lived there 20-plus years ago. He went on to be a reporter on some short lived 60 Minutes type show, but I can't remember what it was called. 56th Street or something like that?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom