Give me a break!
From the RJ Whatever website
Issue #1: Job Losses Caused by ALPA-imposed Small Jet Restrictions
Impact: Job losses triggered principally by union-imposed small jet restrictions, not market conditions.
Examples:
1. Inability to replace obsolete aircraft with market appropriate small jets.
2. Union sanctioned diversion of small jets to other carriers.
3. Mandatory filing of new small jet positions with “mainline” pilots while obsolete aircraft are retired
What rights do you contract RJ guys think you have? All flying belongs at the mainline carrier period. You are entitled to NONE OF IT!! IT DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU!! If management chooses to contact it out to you for a while, good for you. To that extent you have a piece of the action, be greatfull while you have it. If economics make it desirable to have mainline pilots fly it (in whatever size equipment, for whatever reason) then you lose. It's not ALPA's role to defend "sub-contracted" flying, It's no different than sub-contracted aircraft cleaners if company A charges $500 to clean the aircraft, and company B charges $495, Company B gets the contract. If mainlines figures out it can do it itself for $480, guess what? Company A and B lose, so now what? does the "International Federation of Sub-Contracted Aircraft Cleaners (IFSCAC)" step in and cry foul?
Counter-points
#1 Airlines are replacing jets and switching sizes as required, small jets are not the cure all you think. With higher CASM's that RJ's feature. somtimes bigger is better, airlines are starting to learn that.
#2 Which other carriers? if you refer to mainline, whats wrong with that. Mainline is not required to use sub-contracted lift, should ALPA force them? (kind of like reverse-scope, that would be an interesting proposal)
#3 Hey they work for mainline, they flew the route before in your so-called obsolete aircraft. What all of a sudden gives you a right to it?