Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Lib, Alaska mgmt has a heart

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

SneakyJake

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2004
Posts
79
This is MEC Chairman Mark Bryant on Friday, May 27.

I am pleased to announce that MEC representatives and Alaska management
have reached tentative agreement in principle on the terms of a new
collective bargaining agreement for Alaska pilots. This tentative
agreement is subject to final language review, approval by the MEC, and
ratification by the membership.

The tentative agreement provides for a 20% across-the-board reduction in
the hourly rates of pay that were in effect on April 30, 2005, in lieu
of the more substantial pay cuts contained in the recent Kasher
arbitration award. The agreement also preserves our current retirement
plans and adopts virtually all of the TAs reached during the Section 6
negotiations that ended on December 15, 2004, including the TA on Alaska
Air Group scope.

The agreement also contains significant productivity enhancements and a
duration of 5 years sought by management.

The MEC will review the final language of the tentative agreement at a
special meeting on Wednesday, June 1. If approved by the MEC, the full
tentative agreement will be provided to the membership and road shows
will be conducted in LAX, ANC and SEA, followed by the membership
ratification process.

You may look forward to additional information concerning the details of
the TA and its review by the MEC in the near future. ALPA appreciates
the Company's willingness to work with us to craft an agreement that
works better for both parties than the Kasher award. We are hopeful
that the resolution of many of the issues of greatest importance to
Alaska pilots contained in this tentative agreement will foster a
positive work environment that is conducive to providing our passengers
the safe, reliable and superior service for which Alaska is known
 
Although i dont work for AS, I think it is a step in the right direction. I dont think it was because management wanted to do the right thing, it was because management feared the worse and the backlash of the arbitration.

I am sure that they were also surprised of the huge cuts given by the moderator. In the end, it will seem like Ayer really cares for the pilots.
 
I agree..Asking for more than what you are really expecting is just normal barganing, you expect to meet somewhere in the middle. What the meditator did was complete BS, and should be a reminder for people who ever want to try binding arbitration ever again. AS could have kept everything the mediator handed them, but they did the right thing (maybe not because they wanted to, but they did, and that's what counts). Maybe that Alaska spirit is still alive?
 
scope

Does anyone know what the scope entailed? I heard from Alaska jumpseaters that Horizon was getting 900's. Not sure were they got the info from though.
 
Last edited:
QX and CRJ 900s

tomdav said:
Does anyone what the scope entailed? I heard from Alaska jumpseaters that Horizon was getting 900's. Not sure were they got the info from though.

Don't know about the scope, but I don't think we are getting 900's. Here's a response from Gene Hahn on rumor control...

This rumor has been flying around the crew lounges, so thanks for the opportunity to set the record straight. We don't have any CRJ-900s on order. We currently have eight firm orders for CRJ-700 aircraft, with deliveries scheduled at the rate of two per year 2006 to 2009. These firm orders, as well as about 40 options that we have in addition, are convertible to Q400 or even CRJ-900 aircraft. In other words, we have tremendous flexibility in our aircraft orders, and within reasonable time frames, are able to get the right aircraft to suit the mission.
 
tomdav said:
Does anyone what the scope entailed? I heard from Alaska jumpseaters that Horizon was getting 900's. Not sure were they got the info from though.

I'm sure they probably got it from the text of the Arbitration ruling. It reads:

"Mr. Saretsky testified that Horizon Airlines presently has ten regional jets on order, the CRJ-900; That this aircraft is certificated for ninety-two seats; and that Horizon only operates under the Alaska 'designator'. Mr. Saretsky testified that if Alaska is 'frozen at not being able to put the AS designator on to the Horizon Air aircraft, they [Horizon] have a problem' as Horizon would 'have to find another airline to fly the aircraft for or to try and break the contract with the supplier'"

As far as the new agreement, I have read the TA on scope (at least the one prior to the arbitration ruling) in relation to Horizon, and it allows for Horizon to get 10 CRJ-900s or EMB-190s and then for every one more that Horizon gets, Alaska must also get another jet. However there was no overall limit on the number of ~90 seaters that Horizon could get.
 
Last edited:
Scope

QCappy"Mr. Saretsky testified that Horizon Airlines presently has ten regional jets on order said:
have a problem' as Horizon would 'have to find another airline to fly the aircraft for or to try and break the contract with the supplier'"

Who is Mr. Saretsky again? Very good info Qcappy.

Aux pumps dark?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top