Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Let's hear your reactions to this!

  • Thread starter Thread starter jarhead
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 3

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

jarhead

master of my domain
Joined
Mar 27, 2002
Posts
1,162
Associated Press
Delta CEO: Job Cuts Rest on Concessions
Tuesday November 4, 7:12 pm ET
By Harry R. Weber, AP Business Writer
Delta's Leo Mullin Says Job Cuts Possible if Airline Doesn't Get Wage Concessions From Pilots


ATLANTA (AP) -- Delta Air Lines chief executive Leo Mullin said the nation's third-largest carrier, which has already cut 16,000 jobs in two years, could eventually be forced to lay off more workers if management fails to get deep wage concessions from pilots.

In an interview Tuesday with The Associated Press, Mullin stressed that the Atlanta-based airline is not currently planning more job cuts, but he said job cuts may be inevitable if pilots refuse a decrease in their pay. Mullin said the pay cuts are necessary to reduce costs and be in line with competitors' spending.

Delta's pilots -- among the highest paid in the industry -- have said they want a contract extension as part of any discussion of salary cuts.

"If we don't get this we will be a hobbled organization in 2005 and 2006," Mullin said. "At the present time, I don't think we'll be a bankrupt organization. I think we would continue to contract."

Mullin said that contraction could include job cuts.

"I'm saying this because if you were to extend the point where it became your only alternative, then you'd do it," Mullin said. "But at this time, that's not what we're thinking about. We're thinking we're going to get some help from the pilots, and that we will somehow find our way through this in a way that does not involve that."

He added, "But if in fact we continue to have a financial crisis, then obviously you'd have to consider further cost red! uctions and further contractions."

Mullin's comments highlight the h igh-stakes nature of the contract negotiations that resumed last week between Delta and its pilots union. Talks had broken down in July.

American Airlines, the world's biggest carrier, flirted with bankruptcy before winning concessions from workers earlier this year. And regional carrier Midway Airlines is being liquidated after pilot concessions fell through. Until this point, Delta had been hesitant to spell out would happen if it doesn't get concessions of its own.

"We are at a disadvantage in that we don't have the weaponry for negotiation that bankruptcy represents," Mullin said.

Mullin indicated he would be open to the contract extension request if the money is right.

"I'm open to anything. I have not put any restrictions," he said. "If people want to talk about what else is involved here -- work rule changes, contract extensions, whatever else anybody else might raise -- I'll talk about anything as long as I can see the dollars and cents in terms of a reformed! cost structure moving forward."

Ray Neidl, an airline analyst with Blaylock and Partners in New York, said he's not surprised by Mullin's comments. He said Delta's unit costs are at least 20 percent higher than its peers and 40 percent higher than discount carriers.

"Delta's in no immediate danger, but down the road if they don't get the cost cuts in line with competitors, they will do a slow death a la Pan Am," Neidl said.

Mullin said there are signs of progress in the pilot negotiations, but he would not elaborate. Delta initially asked for pilots to agree to a 22 percent wage cut and to give back a 4.5 percent raise they received in May and a similar one due next May.

A new proposal was offered to pilots last week, but the company and the union have refused to provide details.

A spokeswoman for the Air Line Pilots Association did not immediately return a call Tuesday seeking comment.

On other topics, Mullin said Delta's customer service has lagged following ! the previous job cuts. He said that is something the airline plans to work on in the months ahead.

Mullin also said he regretted the controversy about the compensation of top executives earlier this year. It was revealed that, amid the layoffs, a select group of executives had received millions in company payments to a program to protect their pensions.

After the uproar, Delta canceled the final payment to participants of its supplemental executive retirement plan and discontinued the program, which would have been fully funded at $65 million by next year.

Mullin said the pension protection payments were needed in the wake of the 2001 terrorist attacks.

"It's kind of like you had to be there to know what the heck was going on; we were in the middle of a crisis and those decisions looked appropriate at the time, and maybe they didn't look quite appropriate a couple of years later," he said. "But that's 20/20 hindsight. And all I can do is sort of recognize that it created an issue within the company and I certainly have done my best to ! show that I'm sorry the issue got created and to back it by taking some actions."

Mullin said he feels good that the company has been able to avoid bankruptcy.

"Ordinarily, one wouldn't define success at the absence of bankruptcy," Mullin said. "But in the time period since Sept. 11, that really is a characterization that has had to apply."

In trading on the New York Stock Exchange, Delta shares closed at $12.95, up 10 cents, or 0.8 percent.
 
Is Mullin taking a paycut, along with the rest of his managment? Refusing to continue to fund a pension program isn't a paycut. If he wants pilots to take a 20% cut, he should take a 20% cut too, and all the other Delta employees should take cuts - maybe not 20%, but everyone needs to share in the cost cutting efforts.

The DLMEC has done well for itself and its members, so I'm confident they will present a proposal to the DL pilots that is good for the company, the pilots, and the industry.
 
jarhead said:
Associated Press
Delta CEO: Job Cuts Rest on Concessions
Tuesday November 4, 7:12 pm ET
By Harry R. Weber, AP Business Writer
Delta's Leo Mullin Says Job Cuts Possible if Airline Doesn't Get Wage Concessions From Pilots


ATLANTA (AP) -- Delta Air Lines chief executive Leo Mullin said the nation's third-largest carrier, which has already cut 16,000 jobs in two years, could eventually be forced to lay off more workers if management fails to get deep wage concessions from pilots.

Typical management tactic. Divide and Conquer. Make the worker bees think that it's those greedy pilots who want them to lose their job.





Delta's pilots -- among the highest paid in the industry -- have said they want a contract extension as part of any discussion of salary cuts.

More propaganda. I love the way they drop in the "highest paid in the industry" bit.


Mullin said that contraction could include job cuts.

"I'm saying this because if you were to extend the point where it became your only alternative, then you'd do it," Mullin said. "But at this time, that's not what we're thinking about. We're thinking we're going to get some help from the pilots, and that we will somehow find our way through this in a way that does not involve that."

I can hear Mullin say it now, "just in case the workers didn't get it the first time, let's remind them that the PILOTS are threatening them".

He added, "But if in fact we continue to have a financial crisis, then obviously you'd have to consider further cost red! uctions and further contractions."

He tells the truth, but fails to state the cause of the crisis, in hopes that the now scared workers will just assume that it's those dastardly pilots.

Until this point, Delta had been hesitant to spell out would happen if it doesn't get concessions of its own.

"We are at a disadvantage in that we don't have the weaponry for negotiation that bankruptcy represents," Mullin said.

"First we demonize those dirty pilots so that everyone else hates them, THEN we threaten them with bankruptcy. That should scare them into giving us what we want. ", says the management brain trust. In the mean time, SWA is taking measures to control costs (closing some telephone res centers) and they are taking care of the workers that will be affected. Guess which employee group is more happier and more productive.



On other topics, Mullin said Delta's customer service has lagged following ! the previous job cuts. He said that is something the airline plans to work on in the months ahead.

Who would ever guess that cutting jobs would result in worker moral and poor worker moral would result in poor customer service? I guess they must have missed that part of MBA school.

Mullin also said he regretted the controversy about the compensation of top executives earlier this year. It was revealed that, amid the layoffs, a select group of executives had received millions in company payments to a program to protect their pensions.

After the uproar, Delta canceled the final payment to participants of its supplemental executive retirement plan and discontinued the program, which would have been fully funded at $65 million by next year.

Mullin said the pension protection payments were needed in the wake of the 2001 terrorist attacks.


So Leo said that the payments were needed, did he? Well I guess that just settles it. Mr. Mullin said that those managment pension protection payments were needed, and that's it. I wonder why the writer didn't include a reminder about executive salaries like he did the pilot salaries? If the business writers treated management like pilots, it would have been written something like this: Mullin also said he regretted the controversy about the compensation of top executives, executives who are compensated at a rate that equals twenty times the earnings of the average Delta workers, earlier this year.

The real question is this, will DALPA be able to negotiate realistic wage scales in this environment? If management was truly employee friendly, (and if I was a Delta pilot) I would be agreeable to some kind of renegotiated pay package as long as management took comensurate cuts. As long as they continue to play the "blame the pilots", I would say, Kiss my grits.

regards,
enigma
 
What is DALPA asking for in return?

I agree with everything you said Enigma. This is the standard situation in the airline biz. When times are good, management rewards themselves with performance bonuses, while reminding the pilots "you have a contract". When times are bad, management requires retention bonuses to go to work every day, and suddenly "we're all in this together, so the pilots have to give 'til it hurts".

The Delta pilots have to come to their own decision, but I'd be very skeptical of give-backs. Obviously, there needs to be some serious snap-back provisions. Personally, I'd tie snap-backs to the performance of the airline industry as a whole, NOT Delta's performance. That way, it removes the possibility of management cooking the books for their own benefit. It would also keep mangement's perspective appropriately narrow. They would have great incentive to make hay while the sun was shining (operating under reduced salaries). And finally, it would protect the pilots against a sudden up-swing in the economy. I can see a situation where the pilot's agree to long-term give backs, then next year the economy booms.

I don't envy the Delta pilots their decision. I hope it works out for them either way.
 
Exactly.....

That whole article is laughable when you keep in mind Leo's "a contract is a contract" statement. :rolleyes:
 
Poor management leads to collectivization of labor, which leads to more poor management which leads to adversarial relations.

Darwin will eventually take care of this one. The majors in their current form are uncompetitive in most of the markets they serve and will continue to go bankrupt and lose market share to newer, more flexible and better run organizations.

The amount of management and labor time and productivity that goes into adversarial relations will kill them eventually. And both will be to blame. It is a systemic problem rather than solely management or soley labor.

Unless both radically change their approaches (this will almost certainly not happen) they are both doomed to the ash heap in the long haul.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top