Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Lear 60 FO or Beech 99 Captain?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
NetJets requires a multiengine ATP ticket so the single ATP will not work pilotyip.

I'm not sure what NetJets would rather see as far as experience, I think the 99 PIC time would look better on a resume though, ask the FAA to sit in on a ride to get the ATP.
 
I was pilot at Ameriflight and flew the -99. It was a great airplane to fly (coming up from cessnas). There is nothing like single pilot frieght flying to get up your skills and learn how to be a captain and make decisions (the quality that most companies are looking for). I had fun, learned alot, and built up 100hrs a month of pic turbine time. You have to do what is right for you, and many people look down on flying boxes, but I can tell you for a fact that that was some of the greatest fun I have ever had while flying. I have been at a fractional for 7 years now.....as well as many of the people I flew with at Ameriflight are now.
 
There is nothing like single pilot frieght flying to get up your skills and learn how to be a captain and make decisions (the quality that most companies are looking for).

I couldn't agree more. In fact, if there were more of this going on instead of these "aviation college wonder pilots" joining the regionals with 300 hours of radio tuning time, maybe we wouldn't all be scared shirtless riding in the back during the negative-G descents and carrier landings.

Give me the former single-pilot 135 or night freight pilot any day over these guys.

Take the PIC position. The Fracs are looking to hire someone they feel can be a PIC.
 
Again go for the PIC, SIC time does nothing for your career. Friend of mine over 10,000 hours, almost all of it Turbo Jet time, most of it as a F/O at USAir on the DC-9 and 737. Has less than 500 hours PIC in 2002 when he becomes unemployed, he can not apply anyplace decent because they all have PIC minimums. You can learn RVSM; TCAS, etc but decision-making as a PIC comes from flying as a PIC.
 
Thanks for all the replies...I do already have my ATP MEL and I have about 1200 hours flying boxes in a CE-310 for the past two years...so I definitely don't look down on flying freight. Just wondering if having a Lear type with minimal SIC time would be worth much in a year...if the plane was sold and I was out of a job.
 
Just wondering if having a Lear type with minimal SIC time would be worth much in a year...if the plane was sold and I was out of a job.

In your original post you stated that going fractional is your ultimate goal. With that in mind, I would choose the 99 and PIC time. Lots of good experience that will do you very well the rest of your career. Resist that temptation to jump for the shiny jet SIC.

To answer the question above, not much.

X
 
I do already have my ATP MEL and I have about 1200 hours flying boxes in a CE-310 for the past two years...so I definitely don't look down on flying freight. Just wondering if having a Lear type with minimal SIC time would be worth much in a year...if the plane was sold and I was out of a job.
This info makes the decision a little easier. Go for the Lear SIC since you already have the single pilot PIC time. The Lear position will give you some quality (hopefully) CRM time. The PIC time is great, but NJA wants people that have experience working as a crew also.
 
If the Lear job is a Part 91 ops and you typed in the plane you get to log PIC anytime you are flying. So go for the Lear as in 12 months you can have a few hundred hours of Jet PIC which is better then Turbine PIC.
If you plan on applying to the Airlines they will not accept the PIC time as Part 121 says the PIC is the person who signs for the aircraft.
 
This info makes the decision a little easier. Go for the Lear SIC since you already have the single pilot PIC time. The Lear position will give you some quality (hopefully) CRM time. The PIC time is great, but NJA wants people that have experience working as a crew also.
Exactly. A no brainer.
 
Thanks for all the replies...I do already have my ATP MEL and I have about 1200 hours flying boxes in a CE-310 for the past two years...so I definitely don't look down on flying freight. Just wondering if having a Lear type with minimal SIC time would be worth much in a year...if the plane was sold and I was out of a job.

Seeing that you have the ATP, this is a no brainer....take the Lear job. You already have 310 PIC time...good enough. Really, would you rather fly 100 hrs a month, bust your a$$, get stuck in the ice and thunderstorms or fly 30 hrs a month, and be on top of it all plus relaxing on some beach in PBI or Carribbean for a few days worth? Plus a type! Go for the Lear job dude.....

I dont know anything about Ameriflights mx....but the night freight place that I was at was really marginal on mx and pretty pushy when it came down to it as I am sure that you are probably used to flying boxes in the 310 (or maybe not). If they sell the Lear, you will be pretty marketable with the Lear type....you will clearly be more marketable at NJA or any other fractional with some Lear/two man or chick experience.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top