Big beer belly should probably do a little more research beyond his couch, and the internet, in particular regarding the airbus structural separation.
The problem was not aggressive operation of the rudder, but the reversal of the controls coupled with their deflection. Aggression represents an emotional input; the problem was the reversal of input and the magnitude thereof. The manufacturer, with considerable test and engineering data available to establish the operating parameters of it's product (and considerable computer laws to establish just what the pilot can't do with the product), did not provide any indication or direction that this eventuality was possible or likely at sub-design limiting speeds.
Airbus through it's laws, and Boeing through equipment such as ratio changers, strive to prevent overcontrol or excessive control deflection. You will not find any place in the training for that airplane which directed the pilots to avoid large pedal movements or deflections during low speed flight.
It would seem that whereas the ample intellectual educated sea of degrees which formed the wealth of pedigreed knowledge which designed and built the airplane, oversaw it's certification, crafted and administered the training, and who flew it for years did no better than poor uneducated pilot who died while discovering that oversight.
Incidentally...do you know what level of education was held by the deceased flight crewmembers? Have you made effort to determine their education level?
Then again, would a doctorate have made an iota of difference in operating an airplane in accordance with the training received, the manufacturer policies and procedures established, and the laws built into the airframe and the logic thereof? No, it would not, hence the sheer absurdity and utter ignorance of your statements.
More glaring than the ignorant nature of your comments, however, is that you elected to inject them into a thread enquiring about the welfare of pilots and crew who have recently been subject to a miracle of survival, and whom have suffered significant personal injury. The intent of this thread was concern for their welfare and well being, not your inaccurate, unfortuanate, and poorly informed political rant regarding subjects for which you have little understanding, and apparently, insight.
What you have managed to not only embarass yourself and offend others, but to destroy whatever credibility you might have had before you started. Congratulations.
