Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

JO & GK showdown at OGG Corral

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

islandhopper

Clone War veteran
Joined
May 9, 2003
Posts
718
These two monkeys are sure to kill each other. I'm sure glad I bought that case of popcorn for my flight bag this summer.

http://www.mauinews.com/story.aspx?id=18839

Pacific Wings’ feathers ruffled over proposed aircraft mix
By HARRY EAGAR, Staff Writer

HONOLULU – The last time an interisland airline using large planes tried to use a commuter terminal, tiny Pacific Wings successfully objected.
It’s a new year. Another Part 121 (larger plane) airline is trying to move into a commuter terminal. Pacific Wings President Greg ********************************************* is objecting again.

As of Tuesday afternoon, it was not clear who was winning, but ********************************************* was feeling confident after a meeting with state Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration officials.


That was a turnaround just from Tuesday morning, when Airports Division spokesman Scott Ishikawa said the decision had been made in favor of Mesa Airlines’ new go! interisland venture. That, in turn, was a turnaround from the previous week, when go! was informed it would have to use the interisland terminal at Honolulu International Airport.


Both Mesa and Aloha Airlines objected to that. Aloha operates from the interisland terminal on Oahu.


Mesa Chairman Jonathan Ornstein had told Oahu reporters that being in the commuter terminal – a single-story facility next to the four-level interisland terminal – was important to his low-cost strategy, because the departure fees would be lower, $25 rather than $92.


Pacific Wings successfully opposed the attempt by Island Air to use the commuter terminal at Kahului Airport last year.


*********************************************, contends that “big terminals are for big airplanes, little terminals are for little airplanes.”


Ishikawa says circumstances are different in Honolulu, and it was decided that go!’s comparatively big Bombardier Canadair 200/100 RJ regional jets made a poor fit at the interisland terminal, which has jetways for passenger loading.


The go! planes are rather low, he said Tuesday, and the angle they would make to the jetway was awkward.


Airports Division managers decided it would be safer to have the planes arrive and depart at the commuter terminal, with passengers loading the old-fashioned way, by walking across the pavement and climbing aboard on stairs.


Congestion in the lobby and baggage area at the interisland terminal was also a problem to be avoided, Ishikawa said.


Operations are different at Honolulu, the 19th busiest airport in the country, than at Kahului, he said.


********************************************* contends that mixing big and little planes, jets and props, “will have a direct and adverse impact on our business and safety interests.”


Ishikawa confirmed that the division is aware that ********************************************* is “not happy.”
He was so unhappy that he demanded a meeting Tuesday, which was adjourned after an hour and is to reconvene on Thursday.


********************************************* says he learned, however, that there are no contracts signed for go! to use the Honolulu commuter terminal and there is no counter space available there.


On the other hand, he contends there is a counter user at the interisland terminal (JTB travel agency) that could be moved.


He says an FAA representative said that agency would not sign off until there was a final safety plan approved. So far there is none.


********************************************* says the state is jeopardizing its qualifications to continue to get FAA grants. He is challenging the right of the state to continue to collect the $3 per passenger facility fee if it does not attempt to maximize income at the interisland terminal, built partly with federal funds.


“That’s $15 million a year,” he said.


According to *********************************************, the interisland terminal has plenty of room, since it was designed to be home to Aloha and Hawaiian airlines in the days when those carriers had much bigger local operations, plus as many as four other airlines.


Rather than being congested, ********************************************* says, there is a large annex that was used by Aloha and Hawaiian during reconstruction in the late 1990s. It has been empty for the past five years, he says.


Ornstein says he is not aware that FAA has any role in the matter.
********************************************* says he interprets regulations to say that the state cannot discriminate among carriers with different fees.


He thinks the real reason for the brouhaha is that go! and Aloha did not want to be neighbors at the interisland terminal.


Ornstein says go! planned all along to use the Honolulu commuter terminal. Earlier this month, his airline was assigned to the interisland terminal, which set off a dispute on Oahu and surprised *********************************************, who thought the issue had already been settled in March.


State legislators weighed in – where ********************************************* says they had no business to be, since he regards it as a federal matter even though the state owns the airports – and within days go! was assigned to the commuter terminal. However, it does not plan to begin flying until June 9.


********************************************* says the safety arguments being used by go! are bogus. He won a similar argument when Island Air wanted to put its 50-seat DASH-8 prop planes next to Pacific Wings’ 9-seat Cessna Caravans at Kahului.


The Airports Division countered that there was not enough room at Kahului’s main terminal, but ********************************************* stuck to his guns, and Island Air ended up loading with the big boys at the main terminal.


Aloha opened the dispute by objecting to mixing its Boeing 737s with go!’s jets, calling it hazardous.


In a press release issued by PROP (Part 135 Regulated Operators Partnership of Hawaii, a small-plane user group whose biggest member is Pacific Wings), ********************************************* pointed out that “Aloha currently conducts jet operations alongside even smaller 36-seat aircraft with passenger ground-loading requirements at Kona, Hilo, Kahului and Lihue airports.”


He accused Aloha Senior Vice President Lee Steele of telling the world, by implication, that “at least four state airports may not be safe for passengers or employees.”


********************************************* points out that go!’s planes are half the capacity of Aloha’s or Hawaiian’s jets, but five times as big as his Caravans.


If mixing big and little is wrong at the interisland terminal, he said, why is it OK to mix big and very little at the commuter terminal? There also was a question of where go! would fit with its long-term plans for expanding its service.


Ornstein said when go! announced the details of its plans that as his new airline grew, he expected it to re-equip with larger planes, probably 80-seat jets.


Monday, he said, “That’s a couple of years down the road.”
********************************************* says the meeting Tuesday was suspended when time ran out, but intends to renew his objections Thursday.


DOT officials were not available for comment late Tuesday.

Harry Eagar can be reached at [email protected].
 
Why would it sensor out the guy's last name? I'm confused.
 
Last edited:
This makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

Let the good times roll! Throw a couple of wackenhuts into the mix and it's ON!
 
RJP said:
This makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

Let the good times roll! Throw a couple of wackenhuts into the mix and it's ON!

no sh!t. if these two numbskulls go kill each other it would prove to atheists worldwide there is a God.
 
The thread starter was not edited by a moderator. If it were, the program automatically ads a footnote indicating the moderator who opened the post.

Not seeing the original post, I'm left to wonder if the striking of names was so aggregious to the poster as to elicit explatives that he knows is really frowned upon.

Unfortunately, the rules are the rules and Islandhopper gets a week in the box for not only breaking them, but flaunting them.
 
You've got to admit that some of the auto-censorsip features are pretty ridiculous. I understand for some swear words, but for GK's name? Why not Lorenzo, Ornstein, Carty, etc. And don't get me started on GJ's.



Duane Woerth is as useless as t!ts on a nun.




 
Last edited:
ual,

i dont really understand what you're tying to say here... and i think you may be confused. GK's name has been censored for a long time now, many posts have been authored with his name, many articles that have his name have been cut and pasted here and the system for some reason give a long string of *'s for this guys short name.

the original post has no explitives in it.. thats just the way GK's name is censored on the board.


UAL78 said:
The thread starter was not edited by a moderator. If it were, the program automatically ads a footnote indicating the moderator who opened the post.

Not seeing the original post, I'm left to wonder if the striking of names was so aggregious to the poster as to elicit explatives that he knows is really frowned upon.

Unfortunately, the rules are the rules and Islandhopper gets a week in the box for not only breaking them, but flaunting them.
 
"Unfortunately, the rules are the rules and Islandhopper gets a week in the box for not only breaking them, but flaunting them"

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING!!! What kind of politically correct nazi crap is this. Your really going to ban some guy for posting an article with a guys name in it? Lets just ban everyone who types any airline CEO's name. Awe heck, let's just ban everyone who types the name of any airline. Moderator, you've gone too far this time. Grow up.
 
While I'm not advocating the mods on this forum in the least. I'm pretty certain that islandhopper didn't get thrown in the boob for his gk references but for the post he put right after it. It was something along the lines of FLIGHTINFO.COM SUCKS *&^% HARD. Said post is now deleted by management.

I got thrown in the pokey for saying outfcukingstanding (in a positive way) a while back too.

It's a bit overboard.

See y'all in a week.
 
skywav8r said:
"Unfortunately, the rules are the rules and Islandhopper gets a week in the box for not only breaking them, but flaunting them"

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING!!! What kind of politically correct nazi crap is this. Your really going to ban some guy for posting an article with a guys name in it? Lets just ban everyone who types any airline CEO's name. Awe heck, let's just ban everyone who types the name of any airline. Moderator, you've gone too far this time. Grow up.


Folks, the problem is that many of you guys come in after the fact and don't see what got the poster put in the penalty box and start quacking like Donald Duck, only to make yourselves look foolish. This is why if I'm ever on trial, I'm not sure I wan't a jury of my peers- and you guys are supposed to be the situationally-aware, methodical, analytical professionals- just think who else is lurking out there who doesn't enjoy the skills YOU'RE suppose to have.

My earlier reply did two things, trying to inform you that the thread-starting post wasn't edited by a moderator (because somebody was "quacking" about that). The second part explained about Islandhopper and the Penalty Box.

While you might not like the rules here about profanity and it's limits, all the moderators do is try to enforce them when they are pointed out to us. Respectfully, if the rules are that onerous to some of you, please frequent another website. Since we are volunteers, the less cleanup work we have to do, the better. Another point to ponder- we generally respond only to posts reported by other members. That being said, there is no group of members who continually report rule violations. It's a wide cross-section of members who prefer not to have to slog through profanity to get to see what opinions others have. What I'm trying to say here is that MOST people prefer to enjoy what you have to say based on it's merit. If you want to hear profanity, come on over to my house when my wife and kids aren't home and I'll demonstrate a finely-honed skill learned over many decades. You guys haven't cornered the market on expletives- not by a long shot.
 
Last edited:
RJP said:
This makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

Let the good times roll! Throw a couple of wackenhuts into the mix and it's ON!

Naw, Wackenhut has been muzzled.......
 
No-go For Mesa At Hnl Commuter Terminal?

By Harry Eagar
Maui News - April 28 2006

HONOLULU -- As go! airline rushes to get into the air by June 9, the Federal Aviation Administration is on the verge of pulling the ground out from under its feet -- or at least the ground facilities go! wants to use at Honolulu International Airport.

Go!, which intends to become a third all-jet competitor on main interisland routes, wants to use the commuter terminal at Honolulu. which is set up for ground level boarding for its small aircraft. Pacific Wings, the Kahului-based airline that uses the Honolulu commuter terminal, has objected to allowing go! to use its bigger jets there.

Pacific Wings believes that larger go! should use the interisland terminal. Go! competitor Aloha Airlines, which already uses it, objected to that.

The state Airports Division has been on both sides. First it told go! to move to the interisland terminal. Then Brian Sekiguchi, the state airports administrator, decided to place go! at the commuter terminal.

In the week since then, Greg *********************************************, president of Pacific Wings, has been meeting repeatedly with state and FAA officials to press his objections to the switch.

On Wednesday, Mark McClardy, manager of the Airports Division of the FAA Western-Pacific Region in Los Angeles, wrote Sekiguchi that the FAA wanted to review the plans for sharing the commuter terminal among all users, the plans for charges to users and the safety arrangements.

The letter said the FAA would determine "whether HDOT (Hawaii Department of Transportation) proposals are consistent with Airport Improvement Program Grant Assurances that it is obligated to comply with."

On Thursday, Joe Bock, the manager of marketing and public relations for go!, said the choice of terminal "is an airports decision. Like any other body that accepts federal funds, it can be regulated to a certain degree."

The decision is out of the airline's control, he said.

"We will cross that bridge when we come to it. We are confident we will be able to start up (on June 9), and we hope it will be in the commuter terminal," he said. "We are not too concerned we won't have a place to go."

Aloha Airlines spokesman Stu Glauberman said his company had no comment.

Spokesman Scott Ishikawa said the Airports Division "will respond" to the FAA letter. He said that because DOT doesn't know how long FAA wants to spend on its review, he could not say whether the issue could bump up against go!'s target date in June.

Late Thursday, ********************************************* said, "I have absolute confidence in the federal government's ability to regulate its airports and its airlines. The letter speaks for itself."

********************************************* has not seen final plans for go!'s operations at the commuter terminal, but he believes they will adversely affect his business.
He is also pressing the issue of terminal utilization with the FAA. The interisland terminal was built, in part, with federal funds.

In *********************************************'s reading of the regulations, the Airports Division is required to do what it can to make such subsidized operations financially self-sufficient. Therefore, he reasons, the state should be anxious to put a revenue-producing airline in the underused interisland terminal.
If the state does not maximize the return from its asset, he says, that could jeopardize its ability to collect millions of dollars a year in $3 per passenger facility fees.

The FAA letter's mention of the Airport Improvement Program Grant Assurances refers to those fees.
 
FAA inquires about airport plans

The agency wants information from the state before Mesa is
allowed to use the commuter terminal

By Dave Segal
[email protected]

The Federal Aviation Administration is asking the state for
information about plans to put Mesa Air Group's new
interisland airline in the Honolulu Airport commuter terminal.

In a letter to the state Department of Transportation, dated
Wednesday, the FAA said that before the state lets Mesa use
the commuter terminal, it wants to know how airlines will have
access to terminal and ramp areas in a non-discriminatory
manner, how rates and charges are determined, how the DOT
plans to ensure safety with larger and smaller aircraft
operating close to each other and how ramp security is being
handled.

The letter, addressed to Brian Sekiguchi, deputy director of
the state's airports, was received yesterday by certified
mail, state transportation spokesman Scott Ishikawa said.
"We just got it, and need to look at it closer before we
respond," Ishikawa said.

The letter was signed by Mark McClardy, manager of the FAA's
airports division for the Western-Pacific Region.

Greg Stephens, chief operating officer of Mesa's startup
interisland airline, go!, said last night he hadn't seen the
letter but planned to talk to the state about it today. Go! is
scheduled to begin interisland service on June 9.

"I don't really anticipate there being any holdups," he said.
"I've seen the airport plan and I certainly don't see any
safety concerns or other issues."

Greg Kalhstorf, president of interisland commuter carrier
Pacific Wings, which operates out of the commuter terminal
with nine-seat aircraft, has opposed co-existing with Mesa in
that terminal. He said Mesa's presence there will hurt Pacific
Wings' business and create safety concerns due to the mixture
of jets and turboprops.

Peter Murnane, chief financial officer for Mesa Air Group,
compared go!'s situation to Island Air, which operates out of
the commuter terminal.

"To a certain extent, we're no different than Island Air, and
Island Air is flying more aircraft," said Murnane. Go! will
June.

"On Island Air's 37-seat Dash-8s, the wingspan is wider than
our CRJs and the aircraft is taller. On their new (78-seat)
larger planes, not only is the wingspan wider and taller, it's
longer and the plane carries more people. If Island Air is
able to operate safely and efficiently out of the commuter
terminal with all of its aircraft that are essentially larger
than ours, I can't imagine us operating four or five aircraft
is an issue."

Earlier this month, the state DOT told Mesa that it would have
to use the more-expensive interisland terminal occupied by
Hawaiian Airlines and Aloha Airlines. It reversed its decision
after Aloha and Mesa objected.
 
Soverytired said:
Better start greasing the right palms eh?
For the circle jerk?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top