Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Israelification of airports?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Dornier 335

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Posts
1,089
(source)


While North America's airports groan under the weight of another sea-change in security protocols, one word keeps popping out of the mouths of experts: Israelification.

That is, how can we make our airports more like Israel's, which deal with far greater terror threat with far less inconvenience.

"It is mindboggling for us Israelis to look at what happens in North America, because we went through this 50 years ago," said Rafi Sela, the president of AR Challenges, a global transportation security consultancy. He's worked with the RCMP, the U.S. Navy Seals and airports around the world.

"Israelis, unlike Canadians and Americans, don't take s--- from anybody. When the security agency in Israel (the ISA) started to tighten security and we had to wait in line for — not for hours — but 30 or 40 minutes, all hell broke loose here. We said, 'We're not going to do this. You're going to find a way that will take care of security without touching the efficiency of the airport."

That, in a nutshell is "Israelification" - a system that protects life and limb without annoying you to death.

Despite facing dozens of potential threats each day, the security set-up at Israel's largest hub, Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion Airport, has not been breached since 2002, when a passenger mistakenly carried a handgun onto a flight. How do they manage that?

"The first thing you do is to look at who is coming into your airport," said Sela.

The first layer of actual security that greets travellers at Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion International Airport is a roadside check. All drivers are stopped and asked two questions: How are you? Where are you coming from?

"Two benign questions. The questions aren't important. The way people act when they answer them is," Sela said.

Officers are looking for nervousness or other signs of "distress" — behavioural profiling. Sela rejects the argument that profiling is discriminatory.

"The word 'profiling' is a political invention by people who don't want to do security," he said. "To us, it doesn't matter if he's black, white, young or old. It's just his behaviour. So what kind of privacy am I really stepping on when I'm doing this?"

Once you've parked your car or gotten off your bus, you pass through the second and third security perimeters.

Armed guards outside the terminal are trained to observe passengers as they move toward the doors, again looking for odd behaviour. At Ben Gurion's half-dozen entrances, another layer of security are watching. At this point, some travellers will be randomly taken aside, and their person and their luggage run through a magnometer.

"This is to see that you don't have heavy metals on you or something that looks suspicious," said Sela.

You are now in the terminal. As you approach your airline check-in desk, a trained interviewer takes your passport and ticket. They ask a series of questions: Who packed your luggage? Has it left your side?

"The whole time, they are looking into your eyes — which is very embarrassing. But this is one of the ways they figure out if you are suspicious or not. It takes 20, 25 seconds," said Sela.

Lines are staggered. People are not allowed to bunch up into inviting targets for a bomber who has gotten this far.

At the check-in desk, your luggage is scanned immediately in a purpose-built area. Sela plays devil's advocate — what if you have escaped the attention of the first four layers of security, and now try to pass a bag with a bomb in it?

"I once put this question to Jacques Duchesneau (the former head of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority): say there is a bag with play-doh in it and two pens stuck in the play-doh. That is 'Bombs 101' to a screener. I asked Ducheneau, 'What would you do?' And he said, 'Evacuate the terminal.' And I said, 'Oh. My. God.'

"Take Pearson. Do you know how many people are in the terminal at all times? Many thousands. Let's say I'm (doing an evacuation) without panic — which will never happen. But let's say this is the case. How long will it take? Nobody thought about it. I said, 'Two days.'"

A screener at Ben-Gurion has a pair of better options.

First, the screening area is surrounded by contoured, blast-proof glass that can contain the detonation of up to 100 kilos of plastic explosive. Only the few dozen people within the screening area need be removed, and only to a point a few metres away.

Second, all the screening areas contain 'bomb boxes'. If a screener spots a suspect bag, he/she is trained to pick it up and place it in the box, which is blast proof. A bomb squad arrives shortly and wheels the box away for further investigation.

"This is a very small simple example of how we can simply stop a problem that would cripple one of your airports," Sela said.

Five security layers down: you now finally arrive at the only one which Ben-Gurion Airport shares with Pearson — the body and hand-luggage check.

"But here it is done completely, absolutely 180 degrees differently than it is done in North America," Sela said.

"First, it's fast — there's almost no line. That's because they're not looking for liquids, they're not looking at your shoes. They're not looking for everything they look for in North America. They just look at you," said Sela. "Even today with the heightened security in North America, they will check your items to death. But they will never look at you, at how you behave. They will never look into your eyes ... and that's how you figure out the bad guys from the good guys."

That's the process — six layers, four hard, two soft. The goal at Ben-Gurion is to move fliers from the parking lot to the airport lounge in a maximum of 25 minutes.

This doesn't begin to cover the off-site security net that failed so spectacularly in targeting would-be Flight 253 bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab — intelligence. In Israel, Sela said, a coordinated intelligence gathering operation produces a constantly evolving series of threat analyses and vulnerability studies.

"There is absolutely no intelligence and threat analysis done in Canada or the United States," Sela said. "Absolutely none."

But even without the intelligence, Sela maintains, Abdulmutallab would not have gotten past Ben Gurion Airport's behavioural profilers.

So. Eight years after 9/11, why are we still so reactive, so un-Israelified?

Working hard to dampen his outrage, Sela first blames our leaders, and then ourselves.

"We have a saying in Hebrew that it's much easier to look for a lost key under the light, than to look for the key where you actually lost it, because it's dark over there. That's exactly how (North American airport security officials) act," Sela said. "You can easily do what we do. You don't have to replace anything. You have to add just a little bit — technology, training. But you have to completely change the way you go about doing airport security. And that is something that the bureaucrats have a problem with. They are very well enclosed in their own concept."

And rather than fear, he suggests that outrage would be a far more powerful spur to provoking that change.

"Do you know why Israelis are so calm? We have brutal terror attacks on our civilians and still, life in Israel is pretty good. The reason is that people trust their defence forces, their police, their response teams and the security agencies. They know they're doing a good job. You can't say the same thing about Americans and Canadians. They don't trust anybody," Sela said. "But they say, 'So far, so good'. Then if something happens, all hell breaks loose and you've spent eight hours in an airport. Which is ridiculous. Not justifiable

"But, what can you do? Americans and Canadians are nice people and they will do anything because they were told to do so and because they don't know any different."
 
Then what we do with all of the beloved TSA federal employees with their coveted GED's? :laugh:
 
We have alot of out of work part 121 pilots who could be employed on 'almost' every flight to be an Air Marshal with knowledge of 121 operations.
 
I've got huge respect for how Israel handles their security, but one difference I see is the fact that they are a small country with a very real terrorist threat all over the place. As a result, they have a very professional caliber of people handling security. Our minimum wage TSA folks hardly could be asked to carry out the caliber of oversight that the average Israelli security professional is capable of. Due to the very real real and up close threat on a daily basis of a terrorist attack, they have to live with being somewhat of a "police state" for their own protection. I don't see how that level of scrutiny could be pulled off in a country as large as ours, but you would have to start by making TSA something much more than a minimum wage job.
 
Great article. Chances for any of it being implimented mhea? Not great.
 
I've got huge respect for how Israel handles their security, but one difference I see is the fact that they are a small country with a very real terrorist threat all over the place. As a result, they have a very professional caliber of people handling security. Our minimum wage TSA folks hardly could be asked to carry out the caliber of oversight that the average Israelli security professional is capable of. Due to the very real real and up close threat on a daily basis of a terrorist attack, they have to live with being somewhat of a "police state" for their own protection. I don't see how that level of scrutiny could be pulled off in a country as large as ours, but you would have to start by making TSA something much more than a minimum wage job.

I believe all Israeli screeners are college educated.
 
I believe all Israeli screeners are college educated.
So are the vast majority of airline pilots, yet there are still crashes.

break

Last time I went through Tel Aviv (in 2003) it took me a heck of a lot longer than 25 minutes. My bags were completely unpacked and every thing I'd purchased were separately put through the x-ray machine. I was interrogated for five full minutes about where I'd traveled. All this -- and I wasn't even a selectee for special screening. I was just a typical American Jewish tourist

Not complaining, just pointing out that it's impractical to do everything the way the Israeli security people do things. Regardless, our security needs to rely less on brute-force tactics and more on intelligent tactics.
 
Complacency is one of the problems facing aviation security in this country. So we have 911 about 9 years ago, big deal. The Israelis have been in an active war zone for the past 50 years, and generations have grown up to be vigilant at all times, from shopping at a local market to attending a rock concert. Our culture just isn't built this way. It is not gonna change overnight.

It is one of the things that we take for granted, that make this country great, but it's also one of it's achilles' heel.
 
If only we were as smart as Israel... They don't screw around. They also don't have to deal with idiots at the ACLU, CARE, and all the other goons who seem to get taken seriously in the U.S. only.

I don't think things will improve, given the wussies in charge in D.C. these days. I am optomistic that the Israelis will soon take care of Iran, however. It is just a shame that they will have little international help in solving a very clear and present danger.
 
We are far too pc in this country to ever be totally secure. You have to be willing to step on some toes and hurt some feelings now and then to really make a difference.
 
Clearing security in 30-40 minutes at LLBG? HAHA, now that's funny! Expect at least 2 hours if you don't have a handler.
 
If only we were as smart as Israel... They don't screw around. They also don't have to deal with idiots at the ACLU, CARE, and all the other goons who seem to get taken seriously in the U.S. only.

I don't think things will improve, given the wussies in charge in D.C. these days. I am optomistic that the Israelis will soon take care of Iran, however. It is just a shame that they will have little international help in solving a very clear and present danger.

Sounds like someone has been reading a little too much Tom Clancy!
 
The reality is that we are a free country, which does have it's problems. But it far outweighs being a police state.
FWIW, it seems to me Our Constitution protects us from the very behavior Israel has had to resort to.
 
FWIW, it seems to me Our Constitution protects us from the very behavior Israel has had to resort to.

Not sure if you're making a simple observation, defending our Constitution, or excusing the Israeli MO (or all of the above or something else entirely...), but as you said, Israel's hand was forced in how they run their state. Thing is, their state was carved out of a land in relatively modern times where centuries of ideological difference among the inhabitants made it such that their current way of life isn't (or shouldn't be...) terribly surprising to anyone there. We, on the other hand, have a mere two centuries of Constitutionally-protected freedom, liberty, etc. Well, the third world has caught up with us using our own technologies, and their ideologies which do not jive with ours. Non-extremes have to adapt to the extremes to survive. So we need to adapt.
I don't think that our forefathers foresaw what we're living with today. But they did have the foresight to make our Constitution amendable.
 
Last edited:
Last time I went through Tel Aviv (in 2003) it took me a heck of a lot longer than 25 minutes. My bags were completely unpacked and every thing I'd purchased were separately put through the x-ray machine. I was interrogated for five full minutes about where I'd traveled. All this -- and I wasn't even a selectee for special screening. I was just a typical American Jewish tourist.

Not sure why, but something you said or some way you behaved or some stamp in your passport or something they found in their intel gathering before you arrived at the airport triggered their response. Certainly the vast majority of passengers don't have their bags unpacked, so there was some reason why they checked you more carefully.

I'm not saying you did anything wrong; I'm sure you didn't. But maybe you told them you were coming from an area they has security concerns about. Maybe you looked down and to the left instead of up and to the right when they asked you a question you had to think about. Who knows.

The vast majority of the time, I've spent less than 20-minutes from airport entrance in TLV to passing through the security line, not including the hour I have to wait with the Non-Revs for my name to be called (that is, 20-minutes of all security combined, including time waiting standing in lines, but not including the time waiting at the check-in counter while they release the standbys).


To address other people's comments--
  • I'd venture to guess that the majority of the screeners to NOT have a college education yet. Many of the initial layer of security are doing their mandatory public service in lieu of active military service, and that is done pre-college. Many of the security specialists asking you questions are right out of the army (often military intel officers) and have not gone to college yet. Don't confuse army officers with college graduates; most of their officers go to university AFTER their military service.
  • I'm not sure how Israel's security of lifestyle in general would be a violation of our (US) constitutional freedoms. I'm not saying it is or isn't... I'd need to think about specific details, I guess. Having spent a fair amount of time in Israel and comparing lifestyles to the US (and to Europe), I'd have to say that I feel that I have as much freedom overall there as I do here; more in some areas, less in others, so it averages out to be about equal. Walking into a mall or restaurant I have to pause while they ask to look in large bags or hand-wand people, but I've never been asked for ID or hassled in any way. They certainly aren't afraid of good guys with guns; more than once when asked if I was armed I answered yes and was waved right through. Passing the security checkpoints as I drive out of the territories or into the airport property is simply a matter of rolling down the window and saying hello as I roll past... I have never even had to come to a complete stop or show any sort of ID. Compare that with the US where security checkpoints always involve coming to a complete stop, answering questions, showing ID which often gets entered into a computer... hell, even entering the FedEx parking lot for a jumpseat involves checking for my name on a pre-printed checklist at the guard shack, but I've attended events on Israeli military bases by simply showing my invitation (no ID). So, have I given up constitutional freedoms there that I have here? I'm not so sure. I know I sure "feel" more violated here than there, but I think that's because I feel that their security there serves a purpose while ours here is an ineffective power trip.
 
I just did a trip to LLBG. There screening is second to none. Fact is that most of it is totally transparent to the passenger. If you know what you are looking for then yes, you see it. The way that the airport is designed and coodons off each step of the process is evident.

It took us 20 minutes to go from the van to the line at the McDonald's. That was with an escort. For the customers it takes about 40 mins to an hour and a half depending on the lines.

We need to stop saying why we can't and start asking how we can.
 
I just did a trip to LLBG. There screening is second to none. Fact is that most of it is totally transparent to the passenger.

Agreed. If you travel to UK, especially the riding the tube (subway), you'll find yourself always covered by CCTV. A lot can be done behind the scene, and can be of huge significance to deterring any possible incidents. I think it is one of the "cheapest" steps we can take right away to increase our vigilance level. We need more behavior profiling, right away. The random cavity search that TSA is handing out is fine and all, but for the most part, it's just wasting time. It's almost like playing poker with a magic 8 ball in your hand telling you what to do next.
 
Agreed. If you travel to UK, especially the riding the tube (subway), you'll find yourself always covered by CCTV. A lot can be done behind the scene, and can be of huge significance to deterring any possible incidents. I think it is one of the "cheapest" steps we can take right away to increase our vigilance level. We need more behavior profiling, right away. The random cavity search that TSA is handing out is fine and all, but for the most part, it's just wasting time. It's almost like playing poker with a magic 8 ball in your hand telling you what to do next.

I disagree about the CCTV usage in the UK. Yes, there are cameras everywhere, but it doesn't mean someone is watching. As a matter of fact, the additional cameras that were installed by the Labour government didn't do anything in reducing crime.

When I worked contract in the UK, I took the train back from the airport. In it were a couple of drunk lads (guys) who had picked someone to fight with. Things turned ugly by screaming and pushing each others around a little bit. I didn't do anything since I was in uniform and those a**holes were just looking to fight someone. When I got out of the train I asked the train conductor if someone had seem the fight and notified police. He denied, and said that the cameras record in a 30 or 45 minute loop. So, CCTV use has nothing to do with crime prevention, only aids in solving it. It's like the TSA - just for show!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top