Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Is a light twin below 200HP considered "high performance"?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
User997 said:
I know, I'm the same way, and it can be really tough to remember that sometimes. :D

Know the feeling. Speaking of that, I took my ME training in a Travelair, with 2 x 180 HP engines, and it was the first complex aircraft I had flown, so I got my complex endorsement, but couldn't get my HP endorsement. When I started flying the 337, I got my HP endorsement.

It's the rules. Granted, a Travelair goes a heck of a lot faster than a 182, but it's still not a HP airplane.
 
So, wait a minute. So, I could have gotten my alternator to work, just by pumping up the mains?? Why didn't my mechanic think of that??
Could have saved myself a ton of money. Well, not actually a ton, unless of course I paid him in pennies, but then I would have had to pump up the tires in the car, but then the list goes on, of things that would have gotten fixed, by just pumping up the tires.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top