Instrument currency vs. proficiency

[rchcfi]

I will probably be leaving my Alaska flying job after this summer after having spent 2 full seasons up here. I am wondering about my potential options in the lower 48 with my lack of instrument flying.

The company I work for is a day VFR 135 operator only, therefore I don't get a chance to fly the "T" or even practice. There are no flight schools to rent airplanes or simulators from to get current. I know that I could make a trek to Anchorage to get current, but my question lies with being just current or actaully being proficient. I have FS2004 (don't laugh) and practice holds, approaches, etc, but I'm still worried when my resume shows 2500TT / 600ME but only 75 INSTR.

Would any potential employer discard the resume for the lack of instrument time?

Thanks

 

[Mel Sharples]

Not laughing about the FS2004 thing... I used to use an older version to practice too. Scan is scan, my man.

It is not automatically a bad thing. More actual is better but if you can fly the six pack well I wouldn't worry. Many airlines have hired banner towers and scenic tour pilots.

The biggest issue is passing the sim ride and/or making it through training. As long as you are profiecient it shouldn't matter.

Be sure to bring up what you are doing to keep yourself proficient in the interview. If they say, "Your actual time is low..." you can say, "Yes but I have valuable multi time and I've been keeping up my instrument skills by..."

Good luck to you!