Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Imams' lawsuit

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

a320drivr

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Posts
385
Imams' lawsuit names U.S. Airways captain

Charlie Lunan
3/13/2007​
A U.S. Airways Captain was named as a co-defendant in a civil rights lawsuit filed Tuesday by six Islamic clerics removed from a US Airways flight in Minneapolis last November.
The lawsuit, filed in United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, claims US Airways' alleged discriminatory actions were based on the imams' "perceived race, religion, color, ethnicity, alienage, ancestry, and/or national origin."
The suit names Capt. John Howard Woods as a defendant. "At all times relevant to the events mentioned herein, Capt. Wood was an agent and/or employee of U.S. Airways and was acting within the scope of his employment," the lawsuit said. "Upon information and belief, Capt. Wood mad the decision to have Plaintiffs removed from Flight 300."
The imams were removed from the plane after unnamed passengers who saw two of them praying at the gate prior to boarding complained that they were behaving suspiciously, the suit alleges. The suit lists flight attendants, desk agents and passengers as "John Doe" co-defendants. Woods was the only named co-defendant listed.
The suit alleges that the plaintiffs, who were trying to return to Phoenix after a national meeting of clerics, were "denied equal treatment in a place of public accommodation, and falsely arrested and detained by law enforcement officers."
In January, Eagan-Minn.-based Northwest Airlines issued a public apology to a group of 40 U.S. Muslim pilgrims barred from boarding a Michigan-bound flight in Germany. The Muslims were returning to the United States after their pilgrimage to Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
 
And that is why the TSA is training it's employees on the cultural differences of Muslims. Excellent idea! SO when the same thing happens tomorrow, ohhh yaaaahhhh, this here praying thing is a cultural difference and we dont need to worry about it or the potential law suit that will come of it if we do a little investigating here. Political correctness will be the death of many more Americans...hate to say it.

Not to be rude, but did these Imams do there gig to get thrown out and then to file a suit and get some cash? Kinda like playing airport lottery......

How much do we think they are gonna get??? Couple mill for starters and then some....at the minimum.
 
Last edited:
Not to be rude, but did these Imams do there gig to get thrown out and then to file a suit and get some cash? Kinda like playing airport lottery......

I think your answer may lie in their slick appearance at their press conference... During the incident in MSP they were all bearded and wearing non-western clothing, but during their press conference they were clean-shaven with Ricky Martin-like hair-do's and business suits... They are playing on the sympathies of the American public... Sadly, it'll work. They're gonna hit pay-dirt...

Then there's this:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258626,00.html

It seems that before they began their press conference to tell the world about how their civil rights were violated, they booted reporters from the Christian Broadcasting Network and the Washington Times... I guess the imams haven't heard of the first amendment... These guys are repugnant.
 
I think your answer may lie in their slick appearance at their press conference... During the incident in MSP they were all bearded and wearing non-western clothing, but during their press conference they were clean-shaven with Ricky Martin-like hair-do's and business suits... They are playing on the sympathies of the American public... Sadly, it'll work. They're gonna hit pay-dirt...

Then there's this:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258626,00.html

It seems that before they began their press conference to tell the world about how their civil rights were violated, they booted reporters from the Christian Broadcasting Network and the Washington Times... I guess the imams haven't heard of the first amendment... These guys are repugnant.

Yup, these Imams are gonna cash in. And some symapthetic jury is gonna award em quite the little stash of C notes. TSA learning cultural differences of Muslims kills me. Really, would that sociology lesson happend just after 9/11 too??? I dont think so. And why did they pick the Muslims to learn about??? What about the zulu tribes in Africa...shouldnt we learn about them too??? Lets learn about em all....but not just pick one for the sake of being politically correct. Thats wrong......

A little time goes by and lest we all forget that one september morning.......
 
The "virgins" will be toothless, rotting, stinking old hags. There's an old Persian book, predating the Koran, that says so. If you can find it, go read the Arda Wiraz Namag. (Don't worry, it's short and entertaining.)
 
What about the dumba$$ A rab cab drivers in Minnie?

The ones who refused rides to gringos who had liquor with them. What about them?

Who is going to sue them? I say Fak the imams. If they don't like it, get the fak out!

This effin country is going downhill, because everybody and their (terrorist) mother is hiding behind the constitution. "The imams rights were violated, blah blah blah...."

Let's see whose rights are going to be violated when the next blow up happens.

Quit your fakking whining and deal with it. This is the world YOUR (the imam's) people created!
 
What about the dumba$$ A rab cab drivers in Minnie?

The ones who refused rides to gringos who had liquor with them. What about them?

Who is going to sue them? I say Fak the imams. If they don't like it, get the fak out!

This effin country is going downhill, because everybody and their (terrorist) mother is hiding behind the constitution. "The imams rights were violated, blah blah blah...."

Let's see whose rights are going to be violated when the next blow up happens.

Quit your fakking whining and deal with it. This is the world YOUR (the imam's) people created!
Even worse than not carrying people who might have alcohol, are the ones who will not carry blind people with guide dogs.

I am not so sure these people will get much sympathy, they really overreached when they decided to go after the passengers too on that flight.

Or maybe that was the intent, to get passengers to shut up
 
The Imams are not after money. They're after publicity.

When a suicide bomber explodes himself in a crowd, he's not after deaths. he's after publicity.

What the Imams did to get them expelled from the airplane was done for one reason, and one reason only. Publicity.

The Imams are unlikely to win their case, but we shall see. Win or lose, they get what they wanted, which is...everybody say it together now...publicity.

Now you may be saying to yourself that the only publicity that these gents will be getting will be bad...but not so. They're not seeking sympathy in the eyes of non-muslims. Martyrdom is a staple of Islam. By losing at the gate and losing in court, they become martyrs and an inspiration to others in their cause.

By prompting the attitudes we see here in this thread, which are really what one should be hearing from the mouth of a 14 year old...they've won. Your bile supports their cause.

The worst thing anyone could do to them is turn their back, ignore them, and walk away. Doing so takes away their prize and their power. When you try to understand Islam through western eyes, you'll always miss the mark. Their motivations and definitely not the same as your own.
 
No. The captain has the final authority regarding the safety of the flight, and holds the responsibility for ensuring the safe outcome of the flight, but no regulation provides that the Captain chooses who rides and who doesn't. This is implied in his responsibility to ensure the safety of the flight. In addiion, in an emergency the PIC may deviate from the regulation only to the extent necessary to meet the specifics of that emergency, in ensuring the safe outcome off the flght. So much for the regulation, which doesn't mean diddly squat to most of the free world...including the passengers, or a court of law.

FAA regulation is administrative law, a tiny nearly imaginary paper world in which the FAA has authority over things that regard the FAA. Enter civil law...where people sue people and everybody is beholden and open to civil action...now who has the right to decide and do what...rests in the hands of a judge and jury.

The Captain is responsible under 14 CFR 91.3(a); as the pilot in command, he or she is the final authority regarding the operation of the aircrft. That does not mean the captain has carte blance to act against one's civil liberties, rights, or privileges, nor does it offer any excuse or relief under the law. The captain's reponsibilities are regulatory in nature...part of the Code of Federal Regulations. The CFR applies to specific parties, or those who associate with specific parties. Part 91 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, for example, applies to the FAA and those who act under the privileges granted by the FAA, as spelled out in the regulation.

The United States Code, on the other hand, is what you might normally think of as law. Regulations are rules within the government, whereas the USC is the law of the land, such as criminal staute. In between, beholden to the criminal statutes and also to anything else deemed applicable by authority (judges, for example, and in many cases, even juries)...is the civil court...which is where the law suit in question takes place.

Does the captain have a responsibility to oust someone he feels is a threat to the safety of the flight? Of course. Who gets to decide that in retrospect? Not the captain. Not the company. Not the FAA. It's decided by a group of strangers, almost certainly none of whom will be pilots, and the expertise of whom extends only so far as what they're told and convinced by paid attorneys for either side in the case...the jury. While the captain has certain lattitude in making such decions, the PIC doesn't enjoy any protection or authority outside the cockpit, and is always open to being questioned after the fact.

Personally, I don't think the Imams have a leg to stand on. But as I said before that's really irrelevant to their action. By getting publicity, they win, and they get what they want. The decision of a judge and jury is meaningless and entrirely irrelevant to their cause.
 
The Imams are not after money. They're after publicity.

That and getting people to be silent. Notice they are also suing passengers who will more then likely have to pay to defend themselves out of their own pockets, whereas the Imam's have deep pockets. Don't think the intent is also to make it so passengers in the future think twice before reporting suspicious behavior for fear of being sued.
 
This was posted by Dangerboy on another thread, but I think it applies here Re: Political Correctness.

Got this in an email the other day...I think it's spot on.

Define "political correctness":

"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional illogical liberal minority & rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous liberal press which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

--This definition has been attributed to students at Texas A&M University.

The Imams are picking up on the game here, and the Press and ACLU are playing right into their hands!

Does anyone care to wager how much of the millions of the settlement will go to Al Queda?
 
Like I said, this country is going downhill; unless the government stops catering to all these looney tunes.
But, wait, that would be unconstitutional.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top