siucavflight
Back from the forsaken
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2003
- Posts
- 3,512
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
T2S...F***ing with somebody's career like that, even joking about it, isn't a funny matter.That's ok, cause I know everyone in Chicago and I'll put them on the alert for you.
T2S...F***ing with somebody's career like that, even joking about it, isn't a funny matter.
Getting a little defensive there Time2Spare, must be some truth to what these guys are saying. I can see if it was one person, but it seems many folks have a problem w/ this company. Their accident record certainly doesn't help their cause either.
Defensive!? Surely you must be joking. We've already established that I'm not Jim, I have no dog in this fight, I don't work for the FAA, and as one poster put it, I'm just some happy regional pilot.....what could I be defensive about? And as far as accident records go, I'm sure there is plenty of mud worth slinging at many Chicago area flight schools. I've read some of the accident recaps of Palwaukee flyers and most of them sound like stupid pilot/instructor decisions - not bad aircraft or questionable maintenance as some have suggested. Of course Jim does hire from a certain school almost exclusively so maybe the problem stems from there?
SIUCAvflight anything to add? Cambereffect? Samballs?
I didn't think so.
T2S
What about the night N11239 crashed in Buffalo Grove. Jim had one of his new instructors at DLL and would not allow him to fuel up there due to the cost of 100LL, he then bullied his new instructor through the threat of firing him to fly the plane back. Being new and scared of losing his job the instructor flew back at night and ran out of fuel 6 miles NW of the airport, the instructor broke his wrist, and the student walked away, luck to be alive. The instructor wound up getting his commercial certificate taken away from the FAA. I will attach the pictures of the wreckage.Defensive!? Surely you must be joking. We've already established that I'm not Jim, I have no dog in this fight, I don't work for the FAA, and as one poster put it, I'm just some happy regional pilot.....what could I be defensive about? And as far as accident records go, I'm sure there is plenty of mud worth slinging at many Chicago area flight schools. I've read some of the accident recaps of Palwaukee flyers and most of them sound like stupid pilot/instructor decisions - not bad aircraft or questionable maintenance as some have suggested. Of course Jim does hire from a certain school almost exclusively so maybe the problem stems from there?
SIUCAvflight anything to add? Cambereffect? Samballs?
I didn't think so.
T2S
Oh...but there's an underlying tone in your posts that states otherwise.I have no dog in this fight.
These people are relaying their experiences. There's nothing wrong with that. This flight school sounds like it needs an audit from the Feds.Neither is slandering a perfectly fine flight school just because you didn't like the owner, his dog, or his training syllabus..... go back to your Cessna, Dougie.
But not to stray off message too far: Palwaukee Flyers is now a Cessna Pilot Center - a designation only given to the nation's most elite flight schools!