Mr. Irrelevant
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 562
I've got to agree with everyone here on Dean's speech. Way over the top for a guy that finished 3rd.....Guess he felt he had to say something and went a little too far.
I have to admit I don't agree with 100LL often on political issues but most of this is right on. The Dems need to get someone on the ticket that is as close to center as possible. I know Astra mentionedd that in one of his posts. I wonder if the people in Iowa started to realize that Dean just wouldn't beat Bush. He's just too liberal. Most of the Clinton campaign top aides by the way are in the Clark camp. I assume if Clark gets the nomination he'd be the first General since DDE to run for President. There may have been someone else, I'm not sure.
I would also agree with this statement but the same could have been said for the GOP in 96.
I don't think Kerry is all so bad. Amazing that some would put down his Vietnam experience though. I wonder if anyone here really knows first-hand about what he did and whether he functioned in his role well. I think he was a platoon leader but I really don't know either. I don't think the Dems can win the White House with him unless they get Zell Miller on the ticket as VP. Need a southern influence to win.
I'm not from NC but John Edwards doesn't seem so bad. Conservative Democrat (it's all relative guys, relax!!), self made guy (even if it is as a lawyer), probably understands your typical American alot better than GW. Maybe that's not a pre-req to do a good job as President but I'd rather someone from modest means run the White House and not a silver spooner.
Any idea when this guy will stop spending? I know alot of people believe deficits are not a big deal but it really ruined his father and wasn't his fault. When it comes time to pay these debts he's running up, the cost of floating debt on the market is really going to screw us. His father had to raise taxes, he had little choice. GW must be banking on another big ride like we had from 95-00 because there is no way to pay off that debt he's building without another huge run. I think whoever takes over in 2008 is really going to get screwed, Dem or GOP!!!!
Mr. I.
The democrats need to get their act together - and push out the clintonian types among them. I don't see myself voting democrat anytime soon, but I wish they would make my decision harder. They make it easier all the time. To little legitimate opposition, and some of the republicans are going to let it go to their heads.
I have to admit I don't agree with 100LL often on political issues but most of this is right on. The Dems need to get someone on the ticket that is as close to center as possible. I know Astra mentionedd that in one of his posts. I wonder if the people in Iowa started to realize that Dean just wouldn't beat Bush. He's just too liberal. Most of the Clinton campaign top aides by the way are in the Clark camp. I assume if Clark gets the nomination he'd be the first General since DDE to run for President. There may have been someone else, I'm not sure.
The dems are fractured right now. Hatred of Bush is not a platform. (Apologies to the crazies on this board).
I would also agree with this statement but the same could have been said for the GOP in 96.
I don't think Kerry is all so bad. Amazing that some would put down his Vietnam experience though. I wonder if anyone here really knows first-hand about what he did and whether he functioned in his role well. I think he was a platoon leader but I really don't know either. I don't think the Dems can win the White House with him unless they get Zell Miller on the ticket as VP. Need a southern influence to win.
I'm not from NC but John Edwards doesn't seem so bad. Conservative Democrat (it's all relative guys, relax!!), self made guy (even if it is as a lawyer), probably understands your typical American alot better than GW. Maybe that's not a pre-req to do a good job as President but I'd rather someone from modest means run the White House and not a silver spooner.
Today's "New York Times" reports a 10.6 percent increase in Medicare payment to HMOs being proposed by the Bush administration. In addition, the president is asking -- is expected to ask Congress to appropriate another $1 trillion for his so-called Social Security reform.
In addition, the president wants to spend another half trillion for going to Mars and the moon. This is, of course, on top of the $3 trillion in tax cuts for the wealthy, $400 billion in pharmaceutical subsidies, and $180 billion farm bill. When asked about taxpayers could afford all this, Bush said, the same way I afford everything. Daddy will pay for it.
Any idea when this guy will stop spending? I know alot of people believe deficits are not a big deal but it really ruined his father and wasn't his fault. When it comes time to pay these debts he's running up, the cost of floating debt on the market is really going to screw us. His father had to raise taxes, he had little choice. GW must be banking on another big ride like we had from 95-00 because there is no way to pay off that debt he's building without another huge run. I think whoever takes over in 2008 is really going to get screwed, Dem or GOP!!!!
Mr. I.