minitour said:
seems like to me that If I push on the prop when it hits the top of the arc, it should exert the force straight over the top and not at the right side....
Well for one thing you are not "pushing on the top of the prop" at all. That's an abstraction, you're actually pushing up with the tail of the airplane, if you want to know where the force is being applied, so I would turn your line of reasoning around and ask why would *you* think that the reaction would be at the top of the prop when you are pushing up on the tail? My point here is to show you the fallacy of thinking that the reaction has to occur where the force is applied, that's a first step to understanding. Does that help clear your mind?
Why does the force appear to be applied "over there"? Well it is not "over there" to the right, that is just another abstraction, it "behaves" like it's "over there" Saying that precession is the same as a force applied 90 degees later is just a shorthand for understanding how it behaves, not an insight into understading *why* it happens.
The precessive forces are a reaction to acceleration, and "over there" is where the acceleration is occuring (at least some of it). By acceleration, I don't mean "increasing speed", that is not what acceleration means Acceleration means changing the velocity of something. Velocity is both rate of motion *and* direction of motion. What you are doing in the gyroscope is changing the *direction* of motion which is acceleration. wheh you rotate a gyro around any axis other than it's spin axis there is acceleration occuring at all points around the circle. The reason there is precession is because some of the reactive forces act in direct opposition to the rotation, and thus are less apparent, and others act orthogonally (at 90 degrees to) the motion, so are more apparent.
Getting back to our taildragger, when we raise the tail, there is acceleration at the top of the prop disk and at the bottom, because the prop tips change direction as the til comes up, the tips at the top of the disk are accelerated forward and the tips at the bottom of the disk are accelerated aft. These accelerations had reactive forces which act aft at the top of the arc and forward at the bottom of the arc. As a result, the forces at the top and bottom of the prop just make it harder to raise the tail. but, like we said, there is accelration happening at all points around the arc. At the left side the motion of the prop tip is being altered forward so the reactive force is aft, and at the right side, the motion of the prop tip is being altered aft, so the reactive force acts forward. Now put those together, pushing aft on the left side and forward on the right side, and you get a turn to the left. It's not that the force is generated at the right side, it is generated all the way around, it's just that the portion of the force which is *not* directly resisting the tail coming up *acts* like it is being applied on the right hand side.
Does that help?
minitour said:
Thanks though...A Squared, I'll definitely remember that one for when I have to "demonstrate" to a student. Thanks again!
Well, tht depends on whether you understand it or not. If you are are sucessful in understanding this explanation, by all means use it for teaching students.
But if you're still not "just not getting it" don't try to use somone else's explanation which you really don't understand. that can only lead to trouble. If you get asked to explain precession by a student "I really don't understand the physics behind it." is a perfectly acceptable answer. As a pilot, you don't have to understand *why* precession happens, just that it *does* and approximately how it behaves.