Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Help with a research project?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
If you devote the time to truly learn the maneuvers and the concept behind them you will be very well prepared to decipher more difficult RL scenarios...

Such as? I mean, I guess there's always the box canyon scenario with the chandelle, but if that's all ya got...

And remember, you are talking to a guy that taught all his instrument students spin entries and recoveries, so I'm completely in favor of "learning how an airplane flies." It's just that I think to attach those kinds of maneuvers to the so-called "commercial" certification is just sort of non-sequiter. In my opinion, commercial training should be much more "real world" based, i.e. IFR/LOFT. I think the preparation level of the typical student to fly commercially in the "real world" with a wet commercial ticket speaks for itself. Fine motor skill mastery should have been demonstrated prior to this point.

-Goose
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top