Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

HE was one of Air France's "company babies"

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Appreciate there's a vast difference between the hours expected from a candidate applying for a US major vs. that of a European ditto. I also appreciate that having had 1000 hours fooling around in bugsmashers teaching doctors not to kill themselves, getting lots of stick time in the process, has a certain value when it comes to basic feel of aircraft handling.

There are, however, many ways to skin a cat, and the highly specialised integrated or modular approach to creating a ATPL orientated pilot has its values too.

Our lot has hired quite a few 200ish hour FO's directly on the B727 and B757, but we haven't done it for the A300B4. I got in with 377 hours on the B727, with the first batch of still-wet-behind-the-ears-need-a-note-from-momma-to-fly-nights kids, and that aircraft turned out to be quite a handful for all of us. The airline flies with "real" FEs, so we went directly to the RH seat. It was a very steep learning curve, but we got through and the experience served to improve the curriculum.

We're but a small yellow painted boxhauler, but all the majors from BA over AF to LH etc hires kids at the age of 20 and with 200 hours to be FOs their short-haul fleet. Of all the airlines, LH is probably the only one who've gone and done things the proper way, by having its own flight school and hiring kids straight out of college. It's said that getting in on the LH programme is more difficult than getting into the top German universities. But all of the reputable airlines have a very tough selection process, so the candidates they let in will have the skills and aptitude required to drive big jets.

The worst example are the Frozen ATPL factories, who churn out 200 hour cadets, the majority of which has no prior affiliation with any airline. The more talented of that group manages to land a job, but the vast majority cannot find employment and then buys a 30K Euro type rating followed by another purchase of 100, 200 or 300 hours on the line with an airline. If they manage not to bent anything or kill anyone, they've now got around 500 hours and thus more marketable.

It's one of the worst scams in aviation; a program in which it's nothing but your parents cash separating you from an airline job, not your abilities as a pilot. And let's face it, once you've sat 500 hours behind the FMC of a modern Boeing or Airbus you can pretty much fool anyone into thinking you know what your doing, and rely on the good hearted nature of your TRI/TREs to let you slip by in the sim and on LOFT.

One might expect only 3rd tier airlines to employ a program whereby a part of your FOs are actually paying to be sat there, but that's not the case. It's a practice that's been embraced by the LCCs with joy, so next time you board an Easyjet or Ryanair flight keep that in mind.

"They could teach monkeys to fly better than that ..."
 
MOving the thread to the Correct section..

not nice to pee on the graves of others... none of you were there...

you sound french.

In the U.S. libel does not apply to the deseased.
So pee away, if you must. It's the law of the land*

*USA!, USA!, USA!

Anywho, there is a lot of interesting and pertinent info coming out in this thread
 
Good post, EuroWheenie, appreciate the info on how it's done over there.

My take is that the average, non-military pilot in the US has had uneven training but excellent experience, where the LH-type ab-initio guys have great training but limited experience. This works ok for the US as long as a pilot shortage isn't on, when uneven training meets limited experience.

I think the US way gives pilots a bag of tricks to rely upon, or to at least try, when something crummy and novel is thrust upon them.

As to pissing on graves...didn't Ross say that "in this business we play for keeps?" We dissect accidents in hopes of immunizing ourselves against the same. To say that a crew screwed up ISN'T saying they were bad pilots or people, nor is it saying that the commenter would have done better, all it's saying is that the crew screwed up, and IF you're saying it, then somewhere in your mind you have some idea of what you'd do differently, and maybe that'll keep you and yours alive some day.

Tell the truth- how many of you honestly believe that you would have done the same as AF447's crew?

Two things about AF447 I'm fairly certain of:
1) Their airplane betrayed them, very likely in ways unique to an Airbus.
2) The means to their salvation was at hand, but went unrecognized.

When I have more info, I'll sweeten these up. Even if I'm totally wrong about what caused this accident, I'm still ahead as I've considered several scenarios and what I might do if faced with those situations.

Fly Safe!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top