RJP
Registered Eye-Poker
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2004
- Posts
- 1,005
I'm hoping for some input here. A friend recently interviewed with a couple of places on the mainland. During both interviews, he says that they asked, "you say you've got xxx hours of instrument time? In Hawaii? It's paradise out there....you don't fly IFR." That along with the "how much 'mainland' time do you have" question.
Maybe someone can explain what the possible difference could be between IFR in Hawaii and IFR in Texas. Who gives a **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED** how much time you've got on the mainland or in the islands, it's not a foreign country and the time shouldn't be quantified as "Hawaii Time".
Is there a bias against pilots trained in Hawaii with mainland carriers? I just don't get it. Maybe the (edited) that pushed that angle in the interview should go shoot an MKK VOR-A at night in the rain and circle to land on a 3500' runway. Then they can try to say that there's no IFR in Hawaii.
Maybe someone can explain what the possible difference could be between IFR in Hawaii and IFR in Texas. Who gives a **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED** how much time you've got on the mainland or in the islands, it's not a foreign country and the time shouldn't be quantified as "Hawaii Time".
Is there a bias against pilots trained in Hawaii with mainland carriers? I just don't get it. Maybe the (edited) that pushed that angle in the interview should go shoot an MKK VOR-A at night in the rain and circle to land on a 3500' runway. Then they can try to say that there's no IFR in Hawaii.
Last edited: