At the risk of being told to go back to the kitchen

(I'm on my after clean-up break, Bogart--HA!) or being accused of not following the Rogers principal (personally, I think I do that more than most here) I wish to pose a question. Why are you implying (yes, the implication is there, even down to the trailed off sentence) that the pilots who choose to be proactive in solving the problems you mention are not professional, don't respect the company, and possibly the owners? What factual data do you have to base that accusation upon? I can't believe that other frac pilots are that different from NJ pilots. Not only are the two attitudes mutually exclusive --you can hold one without giving up the other--but the case can be made (based on experiences of NJ pilots) that union organizers bend over backwards to make sure they give the company no cause for complaint. "Hostages" can, and are, taken during negotiations and (presumably) organizing drives.
PRO-UNION PILOTS ARE PRO-ACTIVELY AND PROFESSIONALLY PURSUING IMPROVEMENT