Amish RakeFight
Registered Loser
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2005
- Posts
- 8,006
A lot of the political driven reporting centers on how Conner was "warned" of possible sabotage. It's pandering to a constituency that desperately wants the sabotage story to be true. Here's a report that has some more details that make a lot more sense to those of us who actually fly and understand how airplanes work (or don't work for that matter).
http://adventurebooks.newsvine.com/...by-weather-or-engine-failure-not-a-conspiracy
Thanks for the link, although it gives very little in the way of actual details. The article says nothing in terms of the technical aspects as to what transpired. That was a very layman article with no real information. There's absolutely nothing to gleen from it from a pilots perspective as you state. It's far from comprehensive or acceptable in terms of cause.
Perhaps this was a politically motivated rumor. It seems you don't have much information yourself either as to the particulars. You mentioned fuel exhaustion but the article states something along the lines of icing on the wings or intake icing.
Why do you mention fuel as the cause. Whats your source. Was it already determined that his tanks were empty? The article seems to indicate intake or structural ice. But seems to just throw out possibilities to dismiss "conspiracy theories" without addressing something more tangible. Has a preliminary NTSB report been released?
I'm quite curious as to the particular circumstances surrounding his crash and why they felt it was sabotaged. I thought perhaps someone was local to this accident who had more intimate details as to the how and why the plane crashed.