X-rated
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2005
- Posts
- 498
Great conversation, gents. Bombardier has a history of overstating performance estimates. Also, demand seems to be soft for the 5000 and 6000, in spite of the lower price, somewhat to my surprise. I agree with Gutshot in every respect. However, if I were an owner, I would go with the Global, but most owners prefer Gulfstreams and their brand loyalty is very strong. Again, to my surprise.
I'm not taking one side over the other. It just seems to me long term Gulfstream guys often like to slam the Global. I'm here to tell you that's not justified. I do agree Bombardier likes to overstate the Range. When I got typed in the Global, The XRS was supposed to fly 6150nm. The 6000, which is the same airplane except for the Avionics, has been revised down to 6000nm. The reality is probably closer to 5800 for an average crew. But, since we rarely stretch the range that tightly, I don't care that much. I love the quiet roomy cockpit and crazy short field performance.
The whole Large cabin market has slowed and resale values even for the G650 are dropping quickly. China is cracking down on graft and inappropriate use of funds which is slowing deliveries there. Russia has also slowed to to a crawl due to sanctions and the devastated economy. Oil rich nations are also feeling the pain due very low energy prices. So, it's not a great environment for Large Cabin Business Jets. From my non-scientific observation, Gulfstream dominates in the US, and Global seems to do significantly better overseas. I see a lot of Globals compared to Gulfstreams in Europe and the M.E. I'd guess that's why their business seems to be falling off faster right now. But, make no mistake, the entire large cabin environment is feeling the pressure.