Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

George Bush Shootout - HAHAHAHA!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Ah come on that wouldnt be real..

1. his real name is dumbass
2. he'd really be **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED**ting in his pants
3. he's gotta make sure he kills off a couple of airlines just like his daddy did. (pan am and eastern)
4. he joined the air guard using his daddys help so that he wouldnt get drafted for vietnam... now hes started his own vietnam.
5. well, hes just a wuss... period.
 
4. he joined the air guard using his daddys help so that he wouldnt get drafted for vietnam... now hes started his own vietnam.

At least he served. Did you?

2. he'd really be **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED**ti

I think you are mixed up. It was Clinton (your hero) who "went" in his pants. And dodged the draft...road scholar my a$$.
And you'll probably vote for that phoney Kerry, who hung out with Hanoi Jane.
 
some people just cant disagree respectfully!

We all know the guard today is a different sort than 30 years ago. Im not saying the guard wasnt a contribution, but in those days it was an easily recognized way of avoiding the draft.

and if Kerry was in the war, I would think he would have more of a right to protest than any of us.

Have I served in the armed forces...no... but i did save 25 percent on my car insurance at geico!
 
Get-it-done W would be far more likely to engage in this fashion.

Can you imagine clinton picking up a gun to defend himself?

W is an athlete. Clinton is a paunchy pervert.

Gore would complain that the terrorists are using unapproved teachniques, thus putting him at a disadvantage.

John F'n Kerry would simply state "do you know who I am!!??"
 
embraerjetpilot said:
We all know the guard today is a different sort than 30 years ago. Im not saying the guard wasnt a contribution, but in those days it was an easily recognized way of avoiding the draft.

"You are correct, sir!" Even among the Texas ANG pilots at that time, they referred to their unit as "Air Canada."

embraerjetpilot said:
no... but i did save 25 percent on my car insurance at geico!

You crack me up, man! :D
 
100LL... Again! said:
Get-it-done W

Let's see now...we've spent a year deploying troops in Iraq, 600 courageous and brave Americans were killed, we're spending $87 billion (!) to reconstruct Iraq, and we're not one iota safer because there were no WMDs and no connection between Saddam and al Queda. Yup, he got-it-done. Now, what was it he did exactly?
 
norskman2 said:
Let's see now...we've spent a year deploying troops in Iraq, 600 courageous and brave Americans were killed, we're spending $87 billion (!) to reconstruct Iraq, and we're not one iota safer because there were no WMDs and no connection between Saddam and al Queda. Yup, he got-it-done. Now, what was it he did exactly?

Do you think the Allied forces were wrong in removing Adolf Hitler too? It took slightly more than a year (more like 8 years) to discover what that madman had done to his own people. Maybe we should have stayed out of that one too. After all, it was Japan not Germany who waged war on us. Perhaps economic sactions would have shown him the light. I'm sure Hitler would have come to his senses. RIIIIIIIIIIIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fact is, liberals like you want to eat your steak but then cry foul when you find out how the cow was killed.

You say we are not safer? Well Mr. Dean, I mean norskman2, how many terrorist attacks have there been on our soil since 9/11? Hell, even Libya dismantled their nuclear development program. You're not safer? Say that to a soldier who just got home who was over there trying to make mine and your world safer. After you pick up your teeth, you can tell him how Dubya screwed everything up, if you're still conscious.

Although I am very saddened by the loss of life in Iraq, most people do not know that roughly 4 times your quoted number of troops were killed in accidents stateside during the same time frame.

No WMD's? Not yet. How do you know they are not there? Do you know something that the rest of the world's intelligence community doesn't? If so, why are you writing on flightinfo.com and not telling our government?

After 9/11 Bush said that the U.S. was going to go after the terrorists as well as countries that harbor terrorists. Everyone was behind him after he said that. But when it came time to walk the walk, the hippie tree huggers came out of the woodwork.

Do us all a favor, just stick to your Michael Moore movies and your Barbra Streisand albums and let our Commander-In-Chief do his job.
 
kepjet said:
roughly 4 times your quoted number of troops were killed in accidents stateside during the same time frame.

Geez, 2400 men and women in uniform were killed in stateside accidents in the last two years? Missed that one. Where's OSHA?
 
Anyhoo...

While we're on the subject...

kepjet said:
Do you think the Allied forces were wrong in removing Adolf Hitler too? It took slightly more than a year (more like 8 years) to discover what that madman had done to his own people. Maybe we should have stayed out of that one too.

We wouldn't have waged war on Uncle Adolf just because of what he was doing to his own people. And please don't tell me went into Iraq to "liberate" them. If that were the case, we could have done it along time ago, like says 1991. We didn't know Adolf was such a schmutz to his own people anyways because Joe Kennedy was busy covering it up, but that's another story...talk about bad intel! Anyways we declared war because Der Furhrer represented a clear and credible threat to the U.S. And let's not forget...

kepjet said:
Maybe we should have stayed out of that one too. After all, it was Japan not Germany who waged war on us.

Wrong! Adolf declared war on us first immediately after the Japanese did. Not that it mattered, because we would have declared war on him anyways, but let's at least keep our history straight.

kepjet said:
Fact is, liberals like you want to eat your steak but then cry foul when you find out how the cow was killed.

MMMMMmmmm....steak!

kepjet said:
how many terrorist attacks have there been on our soil since 9/11?

Ain't been no earthquakes neither. Face it, any claims of connections between Saddam and al Queda were booooooo-gus then and bogus now.

kepjet said:
Hell, even Libya dismantled their nuclear development program.

I'll grant you that one. Good ol'Kdafhi is not dumb. That's one positive outcome.

kepjet said:
You're not safer? Say that to a soldier who just got home who was over there trying to make mine and your world safer. B]


The men and women of the armed forces have carried out their duties with distinction. But they don't make policy. T'ain't their fault for this mess. Hats off to them.

kepjet said:
After 9/11 Bush said that the U.S. was going to go after the terrorists as well as countries that harbor terrorists.

Precisely my point. I'm saying the time, resources, money and military power could have directed against alQueda and other terrorist organizations instead of wasting time on Saddam, who in the end turned out to be no imminent threat. Did GW and Co. act appropriately given the available intel? Maybe. Even Clinton was convinced Saddam had WMDs and so did most other countries' intel sources (Germany, France, Italy, Israel, etc.).

I'm no pacifist. I'm saying we went after the wrong target. The whole thing turned out to be a giant headfake. Did we make the correct decision at the time we decided to invade Iraq? At that time, maybe so. We'll see. But it's time to admit that in hindsight it was a mistake. Nothing wrong with that -- everyone makes mistakes, even the CIA and the Prez. But it's time to admit that if we knew then what we know now, we would have and should have acted differently. Yeah, I know, 20/20 hindisight and all that...

kepjet said:
Do us all a favor, just stick to your Michael Moore movies and your Barbra Streisand albums

Hey now! They is practically kin!
 
What the **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED** does this have to do with the humor found in this *game*? Grow the **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED** up.
 
WMD

If there are no WMD in iraq, then where did they go? Did sadam sell them on e-bay? In 1990/1 I remember SCUDs in Dahran.

If the U.N. didn't find them, then they cannot possibly exist!


As for iraq and al queda strings...
Try this: iraq is to al queda, what michael jackson is to boys.

They are in bed together!
 
Re: WMD

cornbread said:
If there are no WMD in iraq, then where did they go? Did sadam sell them on e-bay? In 1990/1 I remember SCUDs in Dahran.
The Scuds - missiles and launchers - were dismantled after Gulf War I. Of course, the Inspector Clouseau-like UN inspectors could never verify that every last missile was destroyed. However, the key is what David Kay said in his recent testimony: the evidence is that Iraq never restarted any of its WMD programs after Desert Storm. Ego-driven maniacal Saddam just wanted the West to think he did so that he could act like he was still a playah.
cornbread said:
: iraq is to al queda, what michael jackson is to boys.
More like what MJ is to normal people: completely incompatible.

Al Queda is driven by religious fervor. They viewed Saddam as a secular, corrupt infidel.

Here's what the Cato Institute (a CONSERVATIVE think tank, I might point out) had to say just before the festivities began last year:
"But the administration's strongest sound-bite on Iraq is also its weakest argument for war. The idea that Saddam Hussein would trust Al Qaeda enough to give Al Qaeda operatives chemical or biological weapons -- and trust them to keep quiet about it -- is simply not plausible. Bin Laden, who views the rigid Saudi theocracy as insufficiently Islamic, has long considered Saddam Hussein an infidel enemy. "

http://www.cato.org/dailys/03-05-03.html
 
So no link between Saddam and terrorism? I guess that's why Abu Nidal was living in Baghdad............

No, the statement was "no link between Saddam and Al Qaeda".

Abu Nidal was an old-style and basically retired Palestinian terrorist. He was an adherent of radical leftist political views (i.e. socialism, communism or some other sort of leftish, basically anti-religious fascism). That's why Saddam gave him shelter---they had similar political views. Abu Nidal represents old-fashioned 1960s/1970s state-sponsored terrorism, of the type the Bush Administration understands.

By comparison, Al Qaeda, as we all know, is highly religious and regarded Saddam, Abu Nidal, etc as borderline apostates---i.e. enemies to be hated only slightly less than the US.

So, to review, Abu Nidal was not connected with, and in fact can be regarded as an enemy of, Al Qaeda.

These distinctions are important, because we stand a much better chance of defeating the enemy if we understand it.

Al Qaeda is not tied to, and does not rely upon, any particular state. In fact, one thing about the new style terrorism (which the old-fashioned cold warriors in the Bush Administration still don't seem to understand) is that if anything, Al Qaeda hijacks states, rather than being supported by them. That's almost certainly what will happen now in Iraq if we leave.

One of the few good things about an Iraq controlled by Saddam is that he kept Al Qaeda out. One of the big screw ups of the Bush Administration is that they've let Iraq devolve into such chaos that Al Qaeda has now taken root there---Iraq is now a breeding ground for Islamist terror.
 
Ok guys just to number some of imporvement in homeland security he (Mr. Busch) never did...

1- Anywhere in the world but here only airline employees can have access to simulator training (now the question why somebody that is not even a pilot need to get simulator training?) for a good money anyone can here in US even after 9/11.

2- Why the TSA guys that never did that job before 9/11 don't get any specialized training in place like frankfurt that check people for more than 25 years and is considered so safe that any flight to israel that is not El-Al needs to stop there. (And avoid all that hassle that they cause and don't even know what they are looking for)

3-Why USA still the only country in the world where people can buy guns on Wallmart and think this is freedom. (no country in the world allows people have guns. just cops and military of course). Here any drunk person who think somebody talk to his girlfriend can go ahead and kill the guy with an Wallmart's gun.

4-And why the president invaded somebodie's country against all people who said they didn't have what he was suposedely looking for?

5-And you know more why Busch wants to inspect everybody about WMD but doesn't let anyone inspect here in US?

6- you probably to young and not aware of the US helping to put down the president of Venezuela just because he said he was not going to sell oil to US anymore unless get paid in euros, so busch decided to spend some extra money in trying to put him out. But this plan as several others from him ended in big money spent money that we taxpayers gonna pay one way or another and the worst is that in him doing so all the world thinks US are bad but who is really bad here is yours Mr. Busch who think people are from evil just because they have diferent religion.

BTW: somebody with this such name Busch could not be good of course, at least they always stuck on my throat.
 
Ligeirinho said:
Ok guys just to number some of imporvement in homeland security he (Mr. Busch) never did...

3-Why USA still the only country in the world where people can buy guns on Wallmart and think this is freedom. (no country in the world allows people have guns. just cops and military of course). Here any drunk person who think somebody talk to his girlfriend can go ahead and kill the guy with an Wallmart's gun.


Thank God for the right to bear arms. If it weren't, we'd probably live in a shi**y country like the one this guy comes from. You foreigners are a bunch of d-a-m-ned cowards when it comes to self-defense and I pray we never give up our right to protect ourselves from the thugs out there. It is also quite evident you have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about. You can't just stride into Wal-Mart and buy a gun.

Just ask yourself one question: A man stands in your bedroom doorway with a knife prepared to stab your wife...which would you chose to have in your possession, a phone or a handgun?

Moron...
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top