ProFracPilot
What's it doing now?
- Joined
- May 1, 2003
- Posts
- 701
2600 NM is really pushing it, unless you have a good tailwind. I use .26 AOA for LRC. I've found that's the most effective speed to use, but that's not 450 kts., more like 410kts/.71 Mach give or take.
If you get into the CC Manual, you'll find that LRC is a moving Mach, starting out near M.80 and slowing as you get lighter. This is problematic when operating in non-radar (NAT-MNPS or CEPAC) as you are required to maintain a constant Mach in cruise. If you're transiting the U.S. in radar coverage, the .26 AOA for LRC can be a good reference - assuming it is calibrated properly . YMMV.
The (straight pipe - yeaahhh ) GII I flew for many years didn't like to do much less than M.74. I never could figure out why. If you tried to slow much more the Mach would quickly roll back below M.68. Hawaii off the west coast was iffy certain times of the year.
You can stay up high late and come downhill at 360+ KIAS. You can accommodate most any ATC speed request, including maintaining a fairly high speed until on short final (ala the 727). Unlike the -IV which will float, the -II (without winglets) is draggy so it will bleed speed quickly and predictably in the flare.
I sure miss that 'ol girl. A wonderful airplane to fly.