ARRRRRGH!!!
Guys, forgive me, but I feel the need to open a can of "get a freak'n clue!!!" on this "SEAFEYE" person...
First of all my friend, I could tell you story after story of TSA abuse of aircrew members... And they DO scrutinize flight bags as well as shake down pilots. I once had a TSA genius tell me that my "D" cell flashlight (you know, the one dictated by the FARs) was a weapon, and could not be taken aboard the aircraft I was working. On another occasion, they told me the same thing. By the way, one of these occasions was at BOS, you know, where some of the 9/11 terrorists boarded... I had to get a supervisor to come over and talk to the screener to convince him that my flashlight was okay.
The point is, I don't think you're fully briefed on what you claim to know so much about. 9/11 had nothing to do with illegal weapons, burdoned screeners, or whatever the H-E double hockeystix you believe you know. Oh, and here is a little news flash for you... The only difference in today's level of security, and that of pre-9/11 is that today's screeners can now own a house while you and I pump up our inflatable mattress at our crashpad... Because of our current level orange, and the number of recent threats, I wont go into the glaring flaws that can be found at each and every station out there (and TSA knows what I'm talking about!).
One more thing, my oh so in the know friend... Not only has the point been made that none of the 9/11 clowns used a restricted item, your stats are pure nonsense... Your contention of only 33% of a screeners resources going to good use is frighteningly narrowminded. Regardless of passenger to nonpassenger ratio, anyone could tote contraband, and then hand the item off to a passenger on the sterile side of security. Besides, aren't you a 135 guy? Do you even interact with the 121 world?
Jason