Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

FlightSafety training concerns for Contract Pilots

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

ho1fo4

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Posts
11
Here is an interesting post on the NBAA web mail.




Dear Independent Contract Pilots (ICP):

I had the most shocking experience of my professional life last week as pertains to training.

For the past 10 years that I have been a dedicated, self employed contract pilot, FlightSafety has always been sympathetic to the contract pilot and their need to write the checks for their own training. All these years FSI has been gracious, polite, and has valued the IC community and their business. They have continuously provided anywhere from a 10% to 35% discount for the self employed ICP (depending on history and type of aircraft). One reason they do that is we can come to training on short notice to fill up classes which are short, unlike many, if not most, large flight departments that cannot schedule last minute events. FSI does, in fact, provide discounts to larger flight departments who train 8 slots or more, and they used to considered the goodwill with the IC community would accomplish the same. Not anymore.

Last week, while in Savannah, I was in talks with the "powers that be" and most of them agreed that the value of the ICP was high, and that, in fact, if taken all together, the IC community was a large flight department and spent a lot of training dollars at FSI. I was talking not just for myself, but for the largeness of the IC community, considering all aircraft.

That is until I met the brand new Savannah Training Center Manager (Dave Davenport). When he came into the meeting, he stood right there in front of me, with no polite or friendly preamble, and said the following: (this is almost verbatim)

"We have so much business right now, in fact we have more business than we can handle, that we don't need your business, don't want your business, and could do without the contract pilots all together."

He said this with a big smile on his face, almost mockingly, and his attitude seeped out of his very soul. The word "arrogance" could be used, though at the moment I had another word on my mind.

Needless to say, I was shocked and appalled at the treatment I received from this individual. After all, I am a "client," but he made me feel like a "turd." Apparently he places absolutely no value on the IC community, and has no intention of accommodating this segment of the industry. All discounts are gone, and he is not remotely interested in securing our business, no matter how many slots we may fill as a group, separately or together.

I left that meeting quite angry at the treatment I received, after all I am a client. Just by myself I spend $35,000 to $50,000 a year at the training center for my recurrent training, and of course many of my friends and colleagues do the same. I thought I had some "client value," but apparently not with this guy.

The Assistant Center Manager, Dick Grant, followed me out to the parking lot and apologized to me for Davenport's attitude, behavior, and message to the IC community, and he hopes to assist us communicating with corporate headquarters to try to regain FSI's dedication and commitment to the contract pilots. I'm still not sure if this attitude originates up in LGA FlightSafety Headquarters, or this Dave Davenport fellow is a loose cannon on his own, but I intend to find out. Both the Assistant Center Manager and Product Marketing Manager still place value on the IC community and want to help keep us as valuable clients. They know how much money we spend as a group, and they would very much like to keep our business, unlike Dave Davenport.

I left the meeting very angry, and as I left the building, Dick chased me out to the parking lot to calm me down somewhat, but I am inclined to never, ever again, set foot in a FlightSafety training center. We'll see how that goes, but I am really disappointed in the attitude these days. I would say the contract pilot business is about shot if this attitude continues.

A footnote here, CAE Simuflite is actively friendly towards contract pilots, and will give the very best price they can to those who are footing their own bill. I have had nothing but positive feedback and communications with CAE Simuflite, and think they may be the best advocate of the contract pilot. For my part, CAE Simuflite is going to be my new training partner. FlightSafety shot the hell out of my 10 years loyalty.

Unfortunately for me, CAE does not yet have a G550 simulator or training program in that aircraft. But I think I am having to shift my loyalties to CAE with this new shift in bad attitude at FlightSafety (or at least the Center Manager at my training location).

I have had communications with one of our own, R. G., and he has experienced the very same indifference and hostility towards the contract pilot community from FlightSafety. He has tried to organize the ICP and their training, but has run into the same block wall with FSI. They just don't like us anymore.

This bodes ill for the contract pilots, who must pay their own training to satisfy the operators' requirements.

This also bodes ill for the operators who need and use qualified and current contract pilots to augment their flight operations.

Anybody else seen this kind of attitude at other FSI Centers?
 
My experiences over the last few years at FSI have been marginal at best.

4 different centers and I have certainly noticed service declining (rapidly)...you can still get a great instructor here or there but they are fewer and far between.

but hey, I go where Im told....

I have heard many complaints..from single contract pilots up to 30+ pilot departments..
 
Last edited:
.

So why not copy this topic to a sales veep at LGA?
Sounds like one individual's bias, maybe not the company. I've had generally good relations at FSI, but had a few clinkers too.
.
 
Having just recently gone from probably THE largest FSI customer to now a very small department (2 light jets) I can tell you that the service/attitude side of things has definately declined over the past few years. I guess I hadn't noticed it because the smallest department I had ever been with had 11 full-service pilots. FSI seems to be focusing on the "big fish" and sort of taking us "small fish" for granted. When I first started my new job the idea of going anywhere else but FSI was probably just idle talk at best, but I can honestly say we'll be taking our business to the competition for at least our next 2 training events to see how things go. I can't say that I have seen degradation in the overall quality of training, but I at least like to come & go under the idea that they care if I return. I'm confident that CAE Simuflite provides a quality product and I just can no longer justify the premium that FSI charges.

I can say with a reasonable degree of accuracy the difference in price that FSI will give to us and what the deals that they cut to the bigger departments for the same training. That said, us smaller operators are most definately the "high margin" clients and should be treated us such. (and yes, I understand the business logic for discounting larger clients and really don't have a problem with it)...

All that said, if I was treated in that manner I would be on the phone with somebody at the LGA Headquarters about it immediately and at least give them the opportunity to straighten it out. I sure would expect a HUGE discount on my next training event if I were you.. (that is if you could ever be talked in to returning)
 
Last edited:
G1159 Recurrent with GIII Differences:

Flight Safety 13,500.

Simuflite 9,800.

This is a no brainer for the Contract Pilot.

.02
 
I don't have anything negative to say about FS...my experiences have always been good. But it seems they are definitely a little biased towards their own sister company NutJets. Maybe Uncle Warren should pay closer attention to the attention both of these companies are creating here lately!
 
I don't like the fact that the G550/450 family is forced to go to FSI SAV. But I still harbor ill will toward FSI for the whole PFT for commuter thing back in the '80's.

Many of us are one pink slip away from being an independant contract pilot for varying lengths of time. We shouldn't turn our backs just because we don't currently write a check for training. Just think, if FSI makes it tough to be a current contract pilot, many departments will have to use FSI people to fill in and FSI will get a cut. Just a thought.TC
 
AA717driver said:
Just think, if FSI makes it tough to be a current contract pilot, many departments will have to use FSI people to fill in and FSI will get a cut. Just a thought.TC

And a VERY interesting one at that. I have often wondered how long it would be until FSI starts some sort of official side-line in to the contract pilot business.
 
AA717driver said:
I don't like the fact that the G550/450 family is forced to go to FSI SAV. But I still harbor ill will toward FSI for the whole PFT for commuter thing back in the '80's.

Many of us are one pink slip away from being an independant contract pilot for varying lengths of time. We shouldn't turn our backs just because we don't currently write a check for training. Just think, if FSI makes it tough to be a current contract pilot, many departments will have to use FSI people to fill in and FSI will get a cut. Just a thought.TC

h25b said:
And a VERY interesting one at that. I have often wondered how long it would be until FSI starts some sort of official side-line in to the contract pilot business.

I remember the FSI PFT thing and it always left a bad taste in my mouth. Of course they were willing to help secure you a loan with interest rates comparable to credit cards at the time (ie 18 % or so) so I guess I shouldn't be complaining. :rolleyes: I know some people who did it and advanced their careers far faster than I was able to but I'm still glad I took the other road.

I've used both FSI and SFI and had mostly good experiences with both. I chose to send our business (18 pilots worth) to SFI because we were able to cut a better deal without sacrificing quality. If it had been strictly about the dough we would have been training soley in-house or using PanAm (wasn't impressed with them at all). Also, it was much easier to make arrangements... you deal with the same people all the time, use the same airlines, hotels, rental cars, etc. FSI was still used as a backup but keeping them as a contract training partner was always more work than SFI.

To be honest, I've always wondered why FSI, SFI, etc. haven't made an effort to corner the contract pilot market. Seems like it would be an easy way to make some money while providing increased service to customers and continued real world experience to their instructors. I just always assumed that they were not staffed adequately to do something like that on more than an occasional basis. I'm sure there is more to it but I wouldn' be surprised to see it happen sometime... sooner than later.
 
AA717driver said:
I don't like the fact that the G550/450 family is forced to go to FSI SAV. But I still harbor ill will toward FSI for the whole PFT for commuter thing back in the '80's.

Many of us are one pink slip away from being an independant contract pilot for varying lengths of time. We shouldn't turn our backs just because we don't currently write a check for training. Just think, if FSI makes it tough to be a current contract pilot, many departments will have to use FSI people to fill in and FSI will get a cut. Just a thought.TC

Actually, FSI competes with the contract pilots by UNDERCUTTING their rates. I have used some FS instructors in the past, and they charged 0, nada, zip, etc. All I had to pay was their expenses. However, since most of them had problems when faced with the pace of daily operations I no longer use them. You just can't freeze the aircraft in position to talk about things.
 
CAE/GE/Simuflight has wised up the stunt that FSI and Gulfstream pulled with the G550. CAE out bid FSI TEB to have the exclusive contract for the 7x. They will be building a state of the art facility in NJ to go directly after the FSI TEB Falcon training. I ould also be willing to bet that they will be conducting marketing studies to determine what other types of aircraft they will be adding to their new 7x facility. I know many operators in the Northeast that would love to see a G4/G5/Global/604/ sim in NJ.

I know that in the past FSI has used thier size to leverage large corporate flight departments into signing excusive contracts. In the past I have delt with sales reps who would tell me, sure you can save X on your G4 training BUT that would mean an increase in your S76B training (FSI is the only game in town).

Currently their is no love lost between FSI and Bombardier (look at Global program), I would expect in the future that FSi has zero access to any new Bombardier/Lear flight test data. Especially if Simuflight is willing to pay for it.

For FSI to build a quality pool of instructors to use a contract pilots, they would actually have to pay descent wages, require pilots to have time in type, have a first class medical and be willing to insure their instructors in the event something happens to a clients aircraft. This would also require Warren to increase head count at their facilities along with providing their instructors a descent Q of L and a schedule.

As far as this post, I personaly feel that this attitude is just that of the FSI SAV mgr. Recently I had to go to the FSI TEB facility and inquire about having to pay for a F50EX initial out of pocket. They were more then gracious and willing to cut me a deal. I knew the price that one of their largest customers were paying for the training. Without mentioning this, they instantly offered me the same price once they found out that it would be coming out of my pocket. I have found the FSI facilities in Wilmington and TEB to be top knotch facilities and as long as they stay the way they are, I have no need to look other places.

I am just glad to see that finally their is some competition for our training dollars.
 
Last edited:
I've never had anything but positive experiences at CAE Simuflite, and I will never go anywhere else. They're cheaper, they're nicer, and they have a better cafeteria. :)
 
I've had good and bad experiences with both. The FSI sales rep in my area has certainly been willing to work with me on price, although he usually can't beat Simuflite.

The big problem with FSI is that each training center is it's own unique deal. Some are good, some are bad. All are different.
 
CapnVegetto said:
I've never had anything but positive experiences at CAE Simuflite, and I will never go anywhere else. They're cheaper, they're nicer, and they have a better cafeteria. :)

Just like the rest of us, you'll go wherever your employer negotiates the best deal.

:rolleyes: .
 
G4G5 said:
As far as this post, I personaly feel that this attitude is just that of the FSI SAV mgr. Recently I had to go to the FSI TEB facility and inquire about having to pay for a F50EX initial out of pocket. They were more then gracious and willing to cut me a deal. I knew the price that one of their largest customers were paying for the training. Without mentioning this, they instantly offered me the same price once they found out that it would be coming out of my pocket. I have found the FSI facilities in Wilmington and TEB to be top knotch facilities and as long as they stay the way they are, I have no need to look other places.
QUOTE]

I hope I'm misreading this statement and you didn't have to pay for your own training on the F50EX:confused:
 
QUOTE]

I hope I'm misreading this statement and you didn't have to pay for your own training on the F50EX:confused:[/QUOTE]

Not a PFT thing. Let it go, there are other reasons that some would "pay for there own training."
 
At the moment, I am my employer.

Gulfstream 200 said:
Just like the rest of us, you'll go wherever your employer negotiates the best deal.

:rolleyes: .
 
I called Flight Safety about some training and part of the recorded message while hoding was how Flight Safety instructors can do contract flying for you.
 
First, I always assumed they weren't actively promoting the use their instructors as ICP's because of liability. As mentioned earlier, you can't hit pause. Also, I heard sure some of their instructors are FS Academy interns and/or have no operational experience (just sim time).

Second, Rice, NICE PIC!! Can I get that in wallpaper size?
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top