Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Flightinfo air to air freq....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

LearLove

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Posts
4,451
anyone think we should have a flightinfo freq? then we could aruge among ourselves while at work. could be interesting. suggestions???
 
123.45 is designated for oceanic air-to-air operations. Use of this frequency for anything else is prohibited IAW FCC and international agreement.
 
That way I can hear Genreal Lee and the ASA pilots yell at one another, instead of jsut reading it and imagine.
 
LearLove said:
anyone think we should have a flightinfo freq? then we could aruge among ourselves while at work. could be interesting. suggestions???

Do you think anyone would be able to get a word in once the General got on freq?

We'd probably have to set up a dual frequency "tower/monitor" thing like they do on ILS/PRM approaches as a back up.
 
CaptSeth said:
123.45 is designated for oceanic air-to-air operations. Use of this frequency for anything else is prohibited IAW FCC and international agreement.


Would the use of 123.45 over say.... Green Bay or Hoboken have an adverse effect on the oceanic aircraft?
 
CaptSeth said:
123.45 is designated for oceanic air-to-air operations. Use of this frequency for anything else is prohibited IAW FCC and international agreement.

Damn you must be fun to fly with !
 
EMBskilzzzzz checking in 230 in my King Air C90 ! yeahhhhhhhhh smooth ride
 
90 percent of the people on this board that hurl insults at everyone else wouldnt have the balls to say it unless they hid behind a computer.

Not to mention say it to someones face.
 
chperplt said:
Would the use of 123.45 over say.... Green Bay or Hoboken have an adverse effect on the oceanic aircraft?

In fact, yes it can. I was recently chatting with another company plane on 123.45 at FL350 between CRG and SPA, and our conversation was joined by a few planes mid-pond asking us to please knock it off. Due to the kind of funky atmospheric bounces that happen on clear nights, they were hearing us clearly over 2000 miles away. This is not that uncommon..

..CT
 
123.45 is the offical alert area frequency for common traffic advisory west of KFLL. It has been designated by the FAA. Whether or not the FCC knows about is unknown. No one has ever said anything to any pilot talking there in the 4 years I have been flying in South Florida.
 
saabtrash said:
My God, I thought people would laugh at this idea...instead you are all talking about how cool it is.

Tools

Your just pissed that during your 8 leg days your Slabb never gets high enough to get any reception. Now get back to calling In-range prop boy...
 
Chicken Taco said:
In fact, yes it can. I was recently chatting with another company plane on 123.45 at FL350 between CRG and SPA, and our conversation was joined by a few planes mid-pond asking us to please knock it off. Due to the kind of funky atmospheric bounces that happen on clear nights, they were hearing us clearly over 2000 miles away. This is not that uncommon..

..CT

How do you know they were mid pond? There are off shore airways off of the entire east coast.
 
Chicken Taco said:
I was recently chatting with another company plane on 123.45 at FL350 between CRG and SPA, and our conversation was joined by a few planes mid-pond asking us to please knock it off.
You were probably joined with the airport janitor, who was out practicing touch and goes in a Tomahawk. It's not your fault that you didn't know any better.
 
Chicken Taco said:
In fact, yes it can. I was recently chatting with another company plane on 123.45 at FL350 between CRG and SPA, and our conversation was joined by a few planes mid-pond asking us to please knock it off. Due to the kind of funky atmospheric bounces that happen on clear nights, they were hearing us clearly over 2000 miles away. This is not that uncommon..

..CT

Those boys have nothing to complain about. 90% of the chatter on 123.45 is either people getting the answers to a quartely test or bashing JetBlue pilots. The latter is actually kind of funny to listen to.
 
CaptSeth said:
123.45 is designated for oceanic air-to-air operations. Use of this frequency for anything else is prohibited IAW FCC and international agreement.

Get a freaking life you goofball, it's a joke.
 
Chicken Taco said:
In fact, yes it can. I was recently chatting with another company plane on 123.45 at FL350 between CRG and SPA, and our conversation was joined by a few planes mid-pond asking us to please knock it off. Due to the kind of funky atmospheric bounces that happen on clear nights, they were hearing us clearly over 2000 miles away. This is not that uncommon..

..CT


Interesting......

If true, I don't see it as a big problem. As was said above, most of the chat over the pond is BS stuff to either keep you awake or bash someone else.
 
Actually 123.45 in the old days, was an unofficial air-air for years. Pilots used it around the world, for a myraid of things. Wasn't untill late 90's or so, that ICAO or whomever finally decided since it's used all the time anyways, to actually publish it. And now as some have posted, it's viewed as the for the sole use of those going across the pond. Oh well.....old things sometimes never die.
 
Popeye0537 said:
Your just pissed that during your 8 leg days your Slabb never gets high enough to get any reception. Now get back to calling In-range prop boy...

Oh my! Aren't we a stud!!!!!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom