pacific 77
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2007
- Posts
- 35
I have some questions about how to correctly list multiengine flight time on a resume and how multiengine time is viewed by employers.
According to Air Inc’s Airline Pilot Resume Kit, the following times should be listed separately on a resume: TT, PIC, Instructor pilot, SIC, Turbojet, Turboprop, ME, SE and Instrument (actual and simulated). The kit also states that multiengine and single engine should equal total time.
Logic dictates then that the ME and SE times to be shown, as logged in each class of aircraft, would also include any dual received in that class of aircraft. Ok that might seem pretty straightforward, but wait, before casting judgment here are my questions:
Are employers really interested in total multiengine time or are they more interested in multiengine PIC?
That is, when an air carrier lists one of its minimum requirements as being “100 – hours multi engine” do they mean multiengine PIC or total multiengine?
Is there any variation between air carriers in how they list the multi requirement?
I always thought that multiengine PIC and not just total multiengine was what really counted.
So then, given the Air Inc. logic that ME+SE=TT, should ME-PIC be listed separately from ME time on the resume?
The reason I’m asking all this is that I want to be sure about the details before applying anywhere, and also to keep the presentation of my resume as uncluttered, clear and straightforward as possible.
According to Air Inc’s Airline Pilot Resume Kit, the following times should be listed separately on a resume: TT, PIC, Instructor pilot, SIC, Turbojet, Turboprop, ME, SE and Instrument (actual and simulated). The kit also states that multiengine and single engine should equal total time.
Logic dictates then that the ME and SE times to be shown, as logged in each class of aircraft, would also include any dual received in that class of aircraft. Ok that might seem pretty straightforward, but wait, before casting judgment here are my questions:
Are employers really interested in total multiengine time or are they more interested in multiengine PIC?
That is, when an air carrier lists one of its minimum requirements as being “100 – hours multi engine” do they mean multiengine PIC or total multiengine?
Is there any variation between air carriers in how they list the multi requirement?
I always thought that multiengine PIC and not just total multiengine was what really counted.
So then, given the Air Inc. logic that ME+SE=TT, should ME-PIC be listed separately from ME time on the resume?
The reason I’m asking all this is that I want to be sure about the details before applying anywhere, and also to keep the presentation of my resume as uncluttered, clear and straightforward as possible.