Actually, you pinhead, I didn't. Leave it to tonyc to find a place to take potshots at avbug. Again.
I said nothing about a "stupid pilot." Those would be words you're attempting to put in my mouth. Again.
The original poster did state that he is a student, was uncertain of his actions, and he posted to ask a question. He made an error. Only a "stupid pilot" could miss the extreme irony in the examples given of a controller or briefer who is faced with an unanswerable question. The poster wondered why the briefer may have sounded short with the poster, to wit I posted a reply detailing by example the dillema faced by the briefer, and an explaination as to how to avoid that in the future.
The point of my post was very simple, though I'm really not surprised it was lost on you, Tonyc. The poster should be prepared with the basics to file that flight plan when he calls the briefer or a controller as the case may be, and he'll find that things go much more smoothly. Instead of him seeing the briefer as "some clown, who is taking his bout with PMS...completely packed with large brown rabbit pellets," he might be instead prepared and do away with the problems entirely.
Not, coincidentally, unlike what other posters here have said, as well.
Again, pretty much what I, and every other poster has already said.
Are you gettting the point with the repetative irony of the little roll the eyes sarcastic smiley face guy, the one you're so fond of using? Good.
I said nothing about a "stupid pilot." Those would be words you're attempting to put in my mouth. Again.
The original poster did state that he is a student, was uncertain of his actions, and he posted to ask a question. He made an error. Only a "stupid pilot" could miss the extreme irony in the examples given of a controller or briefer who is faced with an unanswerable question. The poster wondered why the briefer may have sounded short with the poster, to wit I posted a reply detailing by example the dillema faced by the briefer, and an explaination as to how to avoid that in the future.
The point of my post was very simple, though I'm really not surprised it was lost on you, Tonyc. The poster should be prepared with the basics to file that flight plan when he calls the briefer or a controller as the case may be, and he'll find that things go much more smoothly. Instead of him seeing the briefer as "some clown, who is taking his bout with PMS...completely packed with large brown rabbit pellets," he might be instead prepared and do away with the problems entirely.
Not, coincidentally, unlike what other posters here have said, as well.
The briefer apparently further confused the issue by suggesting that the difference between the type designators had something to do with avionics aboard.
Again, pretty much what I, and every other poster has already said.
Are you gettting the point with the repetative irony of the little roll the eyes sarcastic smiley face guy, the one you're so fond of using? Good.