Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ps- you vote for Romney and fail to elect Obama- that's a failure. Open your eyes.
I'd settle for consistent 7-8% annual return in a heartbeat. What do you realistically want it to be? Just curious. Sorry for the thread hijack.
The problem isn't that they were borrowing from their pension funds throughout the late 80's and 90's, the problem is that they were using the run-up in dot-com stocks and other over-inflated stocks to cash out huge payouts to senior management in the form of bonuses.
Then, when the market adjusted, as everyone knew it eventually would, there was a huge shortfall that couldn't be recouped because of the literally hundreds of millions of $$$ that had been sucked out of the pension funds.
This happened at many airlines, and what helped put the icing on the cake was 9/11, which allowed the airlines a real "out" financially to file bankruptcy, dump the pensions on the PBGC, and laugh all the way to the bank.
History... like Moulder said, "The truth is out there". Which reminds me, can anyone at Southwest shed a little light on your 401(k) funds? Ours suck, been stuck at 7-8% returns for a long while and was wondering how your funds are performing over the last couple years? Rumor has it you guys had one of the best fund managers in the biz working for you guys. Feel free to PM me if you don't want to thread hijack.
Back to the thread topic, oh yeah, American (management) sucks. From TWA to this... just not a good example of real leadership in the last 10 or so years there.![]()
If your mentor gets 4 more years, kiss economic growth in this country, and your airline, goodbye.Ps- you vote for Romney and fail to elect Obama- that's a failure. Open your eyes.
Sad thing is that this was against the law for a long time. In the 70s they passed a law requiring adequate funding of pension obligations AND that they couldn't touch this money for anything but to pay the employees' pension.The problem isn't that they were borrowing from their pension funds throughout the late 80's and 90's, the problem is that they were using the run-up in dot-com stocks and other over-inflated stocks to cash out huge payouts to senior management in the form of bonuses.
Sad thing is that this was against the law for a long time. In the 70s they passed a law requiring adequate funding of pension obligations AND that they couldn't touch this money for anything but to pay the employees' pension.
During the dot com run up these invested pensions funds skyrocketed. Corporations went begging (and bribing) to Congress to allow access to the pensions for the purpose of investing in their own company to create jobs. Great sound bite. Congress allowed access to the funds--without restriction. That's when we saw the average CEO salary climb to 400 times his average employee, up from 30 times average employee in the early 80s.
Since then, it's just been a money grab.