Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CKJET said:At 10,000 they were switching seats? Where can you get a copy of the CVR?
CA1900 said:Just unbelievable. They caused the crash. The plane warned them with the stick-shaker, and tried to force corrective action with the stick-pusher, which they overrode. This is Bombardier's error how? Are we going to have to electrify the control yoke to keep hands off of it during a stick-push?
skykid said:And who speaks for the pilots?
I agree that the lawyers don't care about anything but a percentage of the potential payout, but who speaks for the pilots? Nobody. If you believe everything you hear (even from the NTSB) you are a fool. Nobody speaks for the pilots.
ultrarunner said:1900, chill out. This is SOP in a wrongfull death lawsuit. Remember, this is a civil lawsuit. Which means it's all about the MONEY...
POWDERFINGER said:You spineless scumbags aren't worthy of touching a Piper Cub! So-called pilots pissing on the graves of the dead!
You dare to sit in judgement of dead pilots and their families, as though you represent the manufacturers. Why don't you donate your wages and life insurance to the manufacturer's legal defense fund. Then, when you die in a wreck, they can fend off lawsuits from your surviving family members.
POWDERFINGER said:You spineless scumbags aren't worthy of touching a Piper Cub! So-called pilots pissing on the graves of the dead!
You dare to sit in judgement of dead pilots and their families, as though you represent the manufacturers. Why don't you donate your wages and life insurance to the manufacturer's legal defense fund. Then, when you die in a wreck, they can fend off lawsuits from your surviving family members.
If you're a professional pilot you should be rooting against this family in the litigation process.
POWDERFINGER said:Rooting against this family does nothing at all to protect or enhance the profession. The best thing a professional pilot can do is just stay out of the process and let the litigants argue in court (or settle). Siding with the manufacturers or operators against the pilots is cannibalism, IMHO.
The manufacturer will never, ever, accept responsibility when it can be placed on the pilots. Why side with someone who would not hesitate to protect themselves at your expense??
There should be better screening and training, not ridiculing the dead after the fact. I agree that the crew handled the situation poorly, but no one has the right to say they would have done better had they been there instead. What's next? Do we fault the Columbia crew for getting out of bed on launch day? Let the litigants argue it out, and see what facts they can dig up...
BTW, the won't be any gain for pilots if the families lose.
but no one has the right to say they would have done better had they been there instead
CKJET said:... I can almost remember the Capt.s name ...
POWDERFINGER said:Rooting against this family does nothing at all to protect or enhance the profession. The best thing a professional pilot can do is just stay out of the process and let the litigants argue in court (or settle). Siding with the manufacturers or operators against the pilots is cannibalism, IMHO.
The manufacturer will never, ever, accept responsibility when it can be placed on the pilots. Why side with someone who would not hesitate to protect themselves at your expense??
There should be better screening and training, not ridiculing the dead after the fact. I agree that the crew handled the situation poorly, but no one has the right to say they would have done better had they been there instead. What's next? Do we fault the Columbia crew for getting out of bed on launch day? Let the litigants argue it out, and see what facts they can dig up...
BTW, the won't be any gain for pilots if the families lose.
You're bringing the Columbia crew in to this discussion ??? YGTBSM !!!
POWDERFINGER said:It's open season...
Actually, I don't have time for more of this crap. We'll have to agree to disagree. Maybe I'll find out who is representing the families and send them a few greenbacks to help push the process along. It's more effective than trying to change opinions of incorrigible people.
FL420 said:Three things strike me about this accident:
1. These two were too immature to be flying a swept wing jet at high altitude.
2. These two were too inexperienced to be flying a swept wing jet at high altitude.
3. These two were too poorly trained to be flying a swept wing jet at high altitude.
I think this situation is all too common at regional airlines and even though I fly on them when I have to and I certainly appreciate the ride when jumpseating, I am never comfortable until the door is opened at the gate.
Chuck Yogourt said:The F.O. said somthing like, "Ah dude, we're gonna hit a house". Fine professionals these two were.