Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

FAA withdraws flightcrew duty, rest NPRM

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
All the FAA really needs to do is create a "no fault crew fatigue" policy. If you are tired, call in and you would have no disciplinary action. I think any other kind of regulation on this issue is gonna be so subjective as to be completely useless. Everyone knows a 12 hour day with solid weather and 6 approaches is far more tiring than a 14 or even 16 hour day with clear blue skies.

-I can think of a couple of 12 hour days when I probably would have used such a policy.
 
All the FAA really needs to do is create a "no fault crew fatigue" policy. If you are tired, call in and you would have no disciplinary action. I think any other kind of regulation on this issue is gonna be so subjective as to be completely useless. Everyone knows a 12 hour day with solid weather and 6 approaches is far more tiring than a 14 or even 16 hour day with clear blue skies.

-I can think of a couple of 12 hour days when I probably would have used such a policy.

Yes, but why is it most of your captains call in for the same reason before each of your trips? There is a reason why you only fly with Reserve Captains---they have to fly with you.....Sounds like you aren't liked in cockpit, as well as on forums. Get back to the fry machine McFry!


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:
Careful what you wish for..............85 hrs of credit with 17+ days off a month will go the way Pan Am went.
"hey, kid.....gear up.......i remember the days of getting 4 or 5 days off in a row, but still getting almost 90 hours of credit......."

True, but we also demand pay improvements while in section 6, and tell alpa representation to go to h***when they tell us to concede....
 
Careful what you wish for..............85 hrs of credit with 17+ days off a month will go the way Pan Am went.
"hey, kid.....gear up.......i remember the days of getting 4 or 5 days off in a row, but still getting almost 90 hours of credit......."

I don't know why guys are hell bent on keeping flight hours and credit hours way up. IMO, a 75hr monthly average would be perfect with a an adjustment in pay rates to make up the difference. For me there is way too much on the line to be flying fatigued.
 
Yeah, to hell with safety. Let's fly 20 hours block per day so we can get an extra couple of days off. :rolleyes:

You are still a useless twunt, I see.
 
All the FAA really needs to do is create a "no fault crew fatigue" policy. If you are tired, call in and you would have no disciplinary action. I think any other kind of regulation on this issue is gonna be so subjective as to be completely useless. Everyone knows a 12 hour day with solid weather and 6 approaches is far more tiring than a 14 or even 16 hour day with clear blue skies.

-I can think of a couple of 12 hour days when I probably would have used such a policy.


Now that is brilliant and cuts to the heart of the matter. Everyone wants safety, and we also want to have some protection from being honest and prudent while achieving it. It'l never happen then. Too bad.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom