Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ExpressJet to Fly 22 airplanes for United Airlines

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Eagle757shark

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Posts
575
United deal to boost ExpressJet revenue by 10 pct-CEO

7:21pm EST
*Regional carriers' competition heating up
*Shares ended up 2 cents
By Deepa Seetharaman
NEW YORK, Dec 8 (Reuters) - The contract with UAL Corp's <UAUA.O> United Airlines could boost ExpressJet Holdings Inc's <XJT.N> revenue by 10 percent, the regional airline's outgoing CEO said on Tuesday.
Jim Ream, who is leaving ExpressJet at the end of this month, said the contract he signed will leave the company in a more competitive position.
"It gives us (ExpressJet) an opportunity to really diversify what we do for a living," he said in a telephone interview.
Last month, ExpressJet, once a subsidiary of Continental Airlines <CAL.N>, announced a deal with United to fly 22 planes under the United Express banner starting in May 2010.
Such contracts are the bread and butter for regional, or commuter, airlines and can offer between 5 percent and 12 percent operating margins.
Ream said on a run-rate basis, revenue could increase 10 percent due to the United contract.
"When all the aircraft are in place and flying, if you look at that point in time and if you look at where we were in the previous year, that would be a 10 percent increase," he said.
ExpressJet had revenue of $179.2 million in the third quarter ended Sept. 30.
Six other carriers were vying for the United contract, underscoring the growing competitiveness of the industry, he said.
"These agreements...are going to be few and far between and they're going to be very competitive in trying to win that business," Ream said.
He will be starting at AMR Corp's <AMR.N> American Airlines on Jan. 1 as head of global maintenance operations. ExpressJet has named one of its board members, T. Patrick Kelly as interim CEO.
ExpressJet was also dealt a blow when a flight it was operating for Continental sat on a tarmac loaded with passengers for seven hours in an airport in Rochester, Minn. on Aug. 8. The incident sparked the ire of U.S. transportation officials and passengers alike.
Last month, ExpressJet and Continental were fined $100,000 for the incident.
The announcement of the United deal also boosted ExpressJet's stock and prompted on analyst to upgrade its shares and project a profitable 2010.
Ream struck a more measured tone about the regional carrier's profit outlook, projecting a return to profit by mid-2010.
"Buried in that analysis is an assumption that the majors are flying back to the (prior) utilization levels," Ream said. "I'm going to wait to see how 2010 is going to be."
ExpressJet shares closed at $3.95 on the New York Stock Exchange during Tuesday trading. (Reporting by Deepa Seetharaman; editing by Leslie Gevirtz)
 
Wait....
All the GoJet and Skywest pilots said we were doing this for a loss....
 
Wait....
All the GoJet and Skywest pilots said we were doing this for a loss....
Not sure what your point is. Revenue has nothing to do with profit or loss. And the hopeful return to profit by your departing CEO is based on assumptions of higher utilization by the Majors
 
Last edited:
Wait....
All the GoJet and Skywest pilots said we were doing this for a loss....

It is interesting how many of those guys know so much about an unpublished deal between two companies they don't even work for! How about we all just do our best from A to B and then meet down at the hotel bar and shoot the sh!t and let the bean counters worry about the numbers. That sounds better than the constant free regional airline financial consultations that you guys like to put on here..........
 
Not sure what your point is. Revenue has nothing to do with profit or loss. And the hopeful return to profit by your departing CEO is based on assumptions of higher utilization by the Majors

I agree with that. 69 inactive airplanes equals to no revenue. 22 active airplanes equals to revenue.
 
thank you cybourg10!!!!
 
Skywest would have had to go out and acquire about 20 more 50 seat airplanes, I don't think that they were willing to do that. ExpressJet had the capacity available.
 
It is interesting how many of those guys know so much about an unpublished deal between two companies they don't even work for! How about we all just do our best from A to B and then meet down at the hotel bar and shoot the sh!t and let the bean counters worry about the numbers. That sounds better than the constant free regional airline financial consultations that you guys like to put on here..........


Cy-

Glad you wrote this! I have been thinking it for a long time now watching these boards.

It seems like when I started in this line of work, that pilots were ....well pilots, and we (pilots) generally let the managers worry and discuss the business side of the house. We were quite happy just being good aviators and doing our part of the equation but getting our passengers and cargo to our destination on time.

Not that there is anything wrong about being interested in these things, but it is something that at one point in time pilots just didn't get all worked up about.

Beers on me next time.... and we will do something really crazy while we drink them .... like talk about women and life.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top