See that's the attitude I talked about.
AA guy: "Freaking Eaglets always whipsawing against us........ Let's make them whipsaw another regional, then AMR won't notice us with our pay and pensions."
Sounds like a smart move buddy. Let us know how it works out.
I've heard a lot of whinging about this. What do you think the APA should do with it's leverage on the commuter exception? Remember you must consider:
1. AMR will have the final say on how it complies with the restriction . . . through either sale, shutdown, or in return for some other consideration to the APA. But they will, in the end, have to negotiate an agreement with the APA.
2. AE ALPA has several more years on it's contract giving it no leverage in the process. Any leverage would be bought at the APA's expense.
3. The APA will almost certainly not agree to take the hits in work rules and pay that AMR would demand to fold AE into AA. Plus the fight over seniority merger is something that APA members are very very tired of. In addition, AMR is likely to park a bunch of 50 seaters which could result in more furloughs while we already have 2000 APA members on furlough.
4. AE ALPA members almost certainly would not like the terms of a seniority integration that the APA would pose, even making the wild assumption that an agreement with AMR could be achieved. The disparity of compensation and workrules between AA and AE is too wide.
Unfortunately, the regional genie is out-of-the-bottle and I don't see any way of putting it back in, especially with other majors' weak scope restrictions. The best the APA can do is exercise it's leverage on the commuter clause provisions and get the best deal it can, whatever shape that comes it.
If you were the APA, what would YOU do, keeping in mind that the solution has to be generally supported by the membership??